Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Influential Leaders: Julius Caesar Vs. Mahatma Gandhi

Good Essays
663 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Influential Leaders: Julius Caesar Vs. Mahatma Gandhi
Influential Leaders: Julius Caesar vs. Mahatma Gandhi Julius Caesar and Mahatma Gandhi were both leaders from different countries and time periods. Based on the play, "Julius Caesar" by William Shakespeare, and the movie, "Mahatma Gandhi" directed by Richard Attenborough it is apparent that these two men were in some way very several similar and in other ways very different characteristics. Both were prominent people and lived lives of great importance and leadership. They both died in similar ways as well. But during their lives each man worked for completely different purposes.

Julius Caesar and Mahatma Gandhi were both very influential people during their lives. Caesar was one of the top three men who had power in Rome. Many people respected and trusted Caesar as a leader. Caesar was even offered the crown many times but he refused it. Gandhi's influence extended beyond the borders of India and reached out to the whole world. Gandhi's philosophies inspired millions of people. Both men's lives have ended in similar ways; they were assassinated. Julius Caesar was lured to the Roman Senate and murdered by several conspirators including his good friend Brutus. Gandhi was murdered by a Hindu fanatic who disagreed with his tolerance of Muslims. Caesar and Gandhi were both very courageous men. They stuck their necks out when they knew there were dangers out there. And the fact that they both were murdered shows how real those dangers actually were.

Even though both Caesar and Gandhi were influential leaders, they each had very different views, ideas, and ways of going about doing things. Caesar was an important figure in his society and even had his own army to back him up. Caesar's solutions to problems were solved by fighting, such as the time he fought Pompey and became victorious. Gandhi was different. He had no official political title, he did not command any army, and he did not amass any great wealth. Gandhi's philosophy of non-violence incorporated civil resistance. He believed that non-violent civil resistance, not war, was the way to handle things. He also felt the only solution to hatred, ignorance and fear was love, truth and forgiveness. Caesar's and Gandhi's beliefs were quite different. Both men were assassinated in the middle of their lives, but for very different reasons. Caesar was killed because he was too powerful, and Gandhi was killed because he was too good. Caesar was too powerful because he was a very ambitious man who was power mad. He even set himself up as dictator for life. Caesar wanted the power for himself, while Gandhi wanted the power for the people. Caesar was constantly living in fear of his life. He was superstitious and seemed on edge in several instances. Gandhi was thrown in jail and beaten numerous times and yet stayed persistent and determined despite all the unfair treatment he had suffered. Gandhi believed in Civil Rights and Democracy, which was the complete opposite of what Caesar wanted. Caesar always thought of himself as perfect and decisive. He loved to be in control and have all the power to himself. He enjoyed feeling higher and better than everyone else. He proved this by ignoring the warnings of the Soothsayer before arriving at the Senate. Gandhi was never an arrogant man as Caesar was. He always thought of himself as an equal, no better that anyone else. He dedicated his whole life to helping others. Gandhi exhibited his leadership by wearing homespun cloth that provided employment for poor people and revived the village economy. Gandhi was a very honorable man.

Julius Caesar and Mahatma Gandhi were both very influential and important leaders. They both worked hard at the goals they hoped to achieve. Caesar and Gandhi shared a few character traits but also possessing several different traits, viewpoints, and ideas. Both men made impacts on history during their lifetimes and will be remembered for years to come as brave leaders who risked their lives to achieve their goals.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Both Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln were very influential people of their time. They were both in power of a nation. To this day each man is still considered a respected leader by people around the world.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar and JFK are similar in many ways. Julius Caesar was a Noble Military Leader of Rome, and John F. Kennedy was the 35TH President of The United States. Both Were Looked Up to and both, The People were very affected By both Assassinations.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gandhi and Robespierre definitely handled things in different ways. For example if someone disagreed with Gandhi’s beliefs he would talk to them and explain his reasoning on his actions. While on the other hand if a citizen would dissagree with Maximilien Robespierre they would be executed, beaten, or tortured. In addition Gandhi was offered power multiple times and he ended up giving…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The times Malcolm and Gandhi lived in where during civil revolutions and huge movements in the country's life. They were in different countries but it was all the same. Inspirational men and were really good at bringing a large groups of their people together.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Gandhi had a more peaceful and nonviolent way of defying the government and trying to equalize all the social classes,…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln are two men who made history through their leadership expeditions. When comparing the two one thing that comes to mind is their assassination. Besides their similarity between the two assassinations, there are some differences. However, the major similarity between the two is the that they were both murdered. In fact, they were both carried out by people who disagreed with their power and authority as well as how they used it.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar was one of the most influential leaders in Ancient Rome. H expanded Rome widely winning many battles in Gaul and even north of that. He was a favorite of all Roman citizens and was praised throughout his lifetime. Although Caesar was popular among the people he had many flaws. Caesar was always power hungry attempting to one day become the most powerful man in all of Rome. After a successful victory of the 8-year war in Gaul, Caesar was ready to return to Rome with motivation to be Dictator for life. When he crossed the Rubicon River with his army he declared war with the Roman Republic. The Romans were led by Caesar's old partner Pompey the Great, the most successful General in all of Rome and also Dictator. The 4-year war ended with yet another victory under Caesar's belt and the…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gandhi was the leader of the Indian Independence movement in British ruled India. He resisted the government by using non-violent disobedience. You must keep in mind that the system that he lived in(British ruled India) was very organized and it was very hard to resist the governments laws. He used one of the most effective methods of gathering the people and controlling them to his will. For example when the people made revolts against the British government Gandhi would starve himself to get them to listen because the people really cared about him. This method can only work if the people really care about you. At 5:17 PM on 30 January 1948 Gandhi was assassinated by Nathuram Godse in the garden of the Birla house. In 1930 Mahatma Gandhi challenged the British government by ignoring the salt tax with a 400 km Salt…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Impact

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this essay I’m going to share with you some important facts about Gaius Julius Caesar and his impact on the Republic of Rome. How he contributed to the wellbeing of his people and country before and while he was dictator. Also the impacts he made with the help of his son after he was assassinated.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Influence

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Most people know Gaius Julius Caesar as a powerful and famous Roman general and statesman. Caesar was born in Suburbia, Rome the year of 100BC, and later murdered in 44BC. Growing up Julius had a well-rounded family. His father governed the region of Asia, and his mother was the noble birth. Caesar's private tutor taught him how to read and write by the age of six. When Caesar was just seventeen, he married Cornelia, who was the daughter of an influential politician in Rome. Then as he grew up, he fought in wars and became involved in Roman politics. Caesar is influenced and introduced to the Roman world at a very young age. Although some people view Julius Caesar as a villain, many considered him to be a hero in the Roman world.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln are undeniable two of the greatest men in history. When comparing the two, there are not a lot of things they have in common. However, there are some main things that they did have in common. Both of them were powerful leaders, they both lost parents at a young age, they were in the military and they both were assassinated.…

    • 741 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi Imperialism

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gandhi was a an example of a socialist in which added on to his status of a world leader. One of the main contributions he made socially were the making of non violence organizations. Non-violence was expressed deeply and was the priority in putting his cause forward(Appadorai). His movements were focused on the principles of satyagraha. Satyagraha is an important part of many of his protests but there is more two it than that. Gandhi followed the views of coming together to meet a consensus. He believed that in sitting down, without the use of violence, they will be able to agree on something that will satisfy the wants of both parties(Gandhi). Mahatma Gandhi was prosperous in his movements to gain his countries freedom. You can say this considering the fact that he got India's Independence. After many struggles India had finally gained the rights they deserved. This important day in history was August 15, 1947. Gandhi impacted and influenced people and the world in the present as much as he did in the years after…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Suggested Grade Levels: 2-4 Suggested Curriculum Areas: Social Studies and Language Arts Goals: To study M.L.K. and Mahatma Gandhi’s use of nonviolent protest. Objectives: Students will read about the life of Martin Luther King Jr. Students will view a slide show about the life of Mahatma Gandhi. Students will compare and contrast the lives of M.L.K. and Gandhi using a Venn diagram. Background information for teachers on Mahatma Gandhi: Please check out the Center for South Asia’s website http://www.wisc.edu/southasiaoutreach/lessons/figures/figures.htm…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The lives of Julius Caesar and President Abraham Lincoln. Have many unique difference and similarities. The similarities between Julius Caesar and President Abraham Lincoln are compared by their life history. The individuals were once leaders in the past. Now people look up to them as hero’s in today’s society. The two men shared a hugh amount of power in their countries. Julius Caesar and President Abraham Lincoln were both murdered.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There exist societal paths which differ based on time and place. These paths may have similar topography and may frequently converge, but each creates a separate journey. The belief in passive resistance is defined through the life choices of two great emancipators: Martin Luther King and Mahatma Gandhi. Passive resistance is a means of bringing about the end to legally executed injustice, specifically through peaceful resistance. Scholars have noted connections between the nonviolent movement of Martin Luther King and the philosophies of Gandhi. The two are closely related and share common and obvious themes. While King and Gandhi concur on the courage nonviolence requires, the deplorable nature of cowardly behavior and the necessity of nonviolence as retaliation to oppressors, their beliefs are also defined by quite distinct divergences. They are giant figures in 20th century history; their views on the speed of change and the degree of suffering which is necessary during revolutions and movements are relatively different. These disparities and similarities form elements of their philosophies and the rather successful outcomes to King and Gandhi’s life purposes.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays