“All war is a symptom of man’s failure as a thinking animal.” (Steinbeck)
On March 20th, 2003 I took this picture as my convoy crossed the breach into Iraq. We were the first Marines to lead the march up to Baghdad. I returned with a heavy conscience and apprehension for our future causing me to bury most feelings involving this subject. But current events in our country’s global affairs have given me the courage to revisit my past experiences and explore the foundations within ourselves that advocate violence and war. This is not for justification of my actions but an effort to resolve the enduring question; has war always been inevitable within the human race? Did it transcended from a biological imprint within our psyche or is it a condition devised by our temperament which can be undone?
Some people believe in a deep-root theory, that this predisposition to violence is a component of evolution. E. O. Wilson is considered the “father of Sociobiology” and is a respected scientist in his field. In his article “Is War Inevitable”, he mentions an old parable. A scorpion wants to ride on the back of a frog across a stream. The frog hesitates at first but then realizes that if the scorpion stings him while they’re in the water they will both perish. So the frog agrees and halfway across the water the scorpion stings him. As they both drown the frog asks why he did that. The scorpion replied “because it’s in my nature.” Further in this article Wilson argues that war is “human’s hereditary curse”, and explains that, with the necessity of survival, our prehistoric ancestors have handed down over generations the “engrained” social behavior of competition and contention towards each other. These instincts, he says, started as small tribes of homo-sapiens fought over territories of land during the hunting and gathering era. Food was scarce so territorial conflict was an imminent product of this situation. Even with the development of agricultural techniques in Neolithic times (when humanity acquired more than enough food) our warring nature persisted. We multiplied more rapidly and food once again became a “limiting factor”. And so, he argues, this need for survivability and the enduring acquisition of resources has become forever intertwined into our natural behavior. Many argue against this theory and believe that fighting is a fabrication of our own design, not a biological modification of genes.
At the opposing end of this spectrum is a scientific journalist named John Horgan. Although he expresses his admiration and respect for Wilson in his article “No, War is Not Inevitable”, he argues that there are flaws in the deep-root theory. He explains that the first solid evidence of recorded violence was found in the Nile Valley dating not millions of years ago, but only 13,000 years. This grave was reported to contain combat weapons (not hunting tools) and with this Horgan tries to debunk Wilson’s theory by explaining that war was not manifested in human nature but was rather a “cultural innovation.” He says that further evidence supporting this was shown in observations of chimpanzees (our closest relatives) who share an estimated 98% of DNA with humans. His article states that the first reported chimpanzee raid on neighboring troops (after a decade of observation) was in 1974. Horgan says researchers also stated that from 1975 and 2004 only one chimp died every seven years by this manner. In Horgan’s article he mentions Richard Wrangham, leading chimpanzee researcher at Harvard University and deep-root theory supporter, who admits that these “alliance” killings were very rare. These observations in the wild seem to conclude that animals avoid actions of territorial disputes at all costs, even when resources are at stake. This might conclude that humans, on the other hand, are the only animals that rationalize the justifications of war even when resources are abundant. But are both these angles of approach shaded by a more imperative and imminent concern; the elimination of conflict altogether?
One other perspective invites the possibility of erasing the inevitability of war with conditions of problem solving. Jacque Fresco, a philosopher of science and a futurist, believes that whether it is genes or our own creation, the time has come for a drastic change in our thought process. He says in a video interview that “war is the most inappropriate way to solve differences and…we have to educate people so that they think differently than they do today.” His vision of the future is based on the idea of providing soldiers with an education involving social curriculum and problem solving for the purpose of uniting nations in an effort to restore our “damaged environment”. This thought process stems from a type of bottle-neck theory, viewed by many to be the only logical angle on the inevitability of war; either war goes or we do. This position is indifferent to the causes of violence towards one another, and proclaims that solutions are imperative to the survivability of our species.
My past experience with conflict combined with recent research has led me to believe in a culmination of perspectives. I think animals have always been naturally endowed with a premonition towards violence, and under rare inescapable circumstances, these actions are sometimes a necessity for survivability. But I also believe our ignorance has manipulated this primitive behavior to encourage and create technological advances our reasoning has not yet caught up with. In the wake of our current global concerns we desperately need to redesign our thought process and no longer fear the caliber of a bullet, but the caliber within ourselves to change.
-------------------------------------------------
"The release of atomic energy has not created a new problem. It has merely made more urgent the necessity of solving an existing one" (Einstein)
Wilson, Edward. “Is War Inevitable.” Discover Magazine. Kalmbach Publishing Co. 12 June 2012. Web. 27 Sept 2012.
Horgan, John. “No, War Is Not Inevitable.” Discover Magazine. Kalmbach Publishing Co. 12 June 2012. Web. 27 Sept 2012.
Fresco, Jacque. “Jacque Fresco – War.” 27 October 2009. Online video clip. YouTube. Accessed 28 Sept 2012. < http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXbN1w2cbjM>
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Barbara Ehrenreich, an essayist and investigative journalist, wrote “The Roots of War” in hopes of showing the act of war as a kind of living parasite on human societies. Through several modes of development and logical and emotional appeals, Ehrenreich states her main claim while forming an effective and persuasive essay by using credible resources to support her claims.…
- 522 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
What justifies war? Who justifies it? Why as human beings do we feel the need to fight, harm, and kill others to achieve certain goals? These questions have been pertinent to our society since the beginning of time and continue to challenge us to better understand the human psyche, and code of ethics that give Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Coast Guardsmen, and Marines credence to kill in the name of the United States of America. These ethics of war lay the foundation for that code of understanding and righteousness for when it is justifiable to pull the trigger and take the life of another, or commit an act of war.…
- 1946 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In today’s society war and peace is put on display for the mass public to be seen more than ever. War is glorified through movies, videos games, comic books and many more. Horrific images of war were first seen in the Civil War in North America of a “Dead Confederate Solider with Gun” this photograph no longer “romanticized” war but bought the reality of war through a black and white photograph. The video game “Call of Duty” is another display of war, it…
- 858 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“It seemed clear that wars were not made by generations and their stupidities, but that wars were made instead by something ignorant in the human heart” (Chapter 13, 201)…
- 449 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
war destroys more than just the physical level; the decline of morality has taken place…
- 1521 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
7. Encourages that all of man should be taken to the past and be reminded about the wars in their past and what a mess they made so more precautions can be taken against them and there terrible outcomes.…
- 255 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Violence has a long standing history in society. Violence is ingrained in human nature in many ways. An understanding of violence now plays a key role in many of our social interactions. Some people have even evolved to be more aggressive because as as a society we reward aggression.…
- 753 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the 5th century, the philosopher Plato insightfully noted, ‘Only the dead have seen the end of war,” with history showing this to be true. People have continued to engage in all manner of conflicts, be they petty arguments or large-scale confrontations from which valuable lessons have been learnt about human nature and the present. History has revealed the flaws and primitive nature of people irrespective of the mistaken belief that progress has led to civilisation and order. Past conflicts teach that individuals, communities and even nations do not learn from past mistakes but continue to repeat them and that despite eventually being resolved, the effects have the ability to linger and haunt subsequent generations. History also teaches that conflict invariably occurs when people or nations act for self-interest and personal gain, or and when uncompromising authorities exploit their absolute power over citizens to ensure their authority remains unquestioned. Also by understanding the causes of past conflicts, individuals may reflect on their own behaviours and hopefully prevent them from occurring in the present, or if they do, provide a guide as to how to best minimise the damage they cause by knowing how to resolve them quickly and equitably before they spread beyond the main combatants which they invariably do.…
- 1203 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
War has become a game for the United States, an addicting one. Many years ago, war was always seen as a last tragic sult, but when forwarding in time, this is no…
- 415 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In Warfare: An Invention- Not a Biological Necessity, Margaret Mead states that war is a creation of man, not a necessity we need in order to thrive. She begins by stating that those who believe war is a biological necessity see men as aggressive by nature. This natural aggression leads men to need an outlet for their frustration which, in this case, is war. She proceeds to suggest that war is a creation of society. The origins of war, such as the struggle for land and natural resources, are not man’s nature, they are the nature of the society and history. Lastly, Mead points out that war is inevitable until we change our social system and our desire for power and possessions. If this change of system is successful, “warfare would disappear,…
- 1109 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In this paper, I will attempt to argue Michael Walzer’s reasoning that war is not inevitable, and show that freedom of choice does not exists for the parties involved. I will present an argument for the inevitability of war after outlining Walzer’s objections to the realist’s point of view on the morality of war.…
- 960 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
While some scholars see warfare as an inescapable and integral aspect of human nature, others argue that it is only inevitable under certain socio-cultural or ecological circumstances. Some scholars argue that the practice of war is not linked to any single type of political organization or society. Rather, as discussed by John Keegan in his History of Warfare, war is a universal phenomenon whose form and scope is defined by the society that wages it. Another argument suggests that since there are human societies in which warfare does not exist, humans may not be naturally disposed for warfare, which emerges under particular circumstances.…
- 884 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
As far as we know, war has always been part of human history. War occurred from time to time, in one form or another, even throughout our prehistory. What is war? Sociologically speaking, war is “organized, armed conflict among the peoples of various societies” (Macionis). Differed from gusty conflicts, war is well-planned and well-prepared, referring to the extension of a serious of disputes, if not one. From Sunzi’s The Art of War to Bernard Brodie’s The Absolute Weapon, human’s efforts on the war strategy study never waned. War is also characterized by means of arms. Ever since war’s advent, technology has become its counterpart, pushing each other to the very verge of human annihilation. But most importantly, war is a social construction, which happens among various societies holding different cultural traits, such as languages, norms, values, and beliefs (or specifically, religions).…
- 2935 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
I think war is unacceptable for a number of different reasons. My first reason is the amount of civilians killed, such as when the two nuclear bombs were dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima in world war 2 and killed 350,000 innocent lives.…
- 342 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Devastating acts such as the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon have left many concerned about the possibility of future incidents in the United States and their potential impact. These attacks have raised uncertainty about what might happen next. Terrorism may involve devastating acts using weapons of mass destruction ranging from chemical agents, biological hazards, a radiological or nuclear device, and other explosives. The primary objective of a terrorist is to create widespread fear. Nevertheless, there are things you can do to prepare for the unexpected and reduce the stress that you may feel now and later, should another emergency arise.…
- 590 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays