Individual Interaction Analysis

Only available on StudyMode
  • Download(s) : 21
  • Published : February 10, 2013
Open Document
Text Preview
Individual Interaction Analysis 2 Our original group name was PAYBBB. PAYBBB’s was a combination of each members last name Bria Priddy, Campbell Anderson, Brittany Younts, Sharoyal Brown, Quamir Brown, and Sarika Bour. However, after all of the trials and tribulations we experienced through our first project, which was the Band Analysis we decided to reassess the situation and also the name of our group. The Band we chose for our Band Analysis was N.W.A. (N**** Wit Attitude). We felt that we came together as not only a small group, but also a family. The group as a whole decided it was time for change; we then changed our name from PAYBBB to N.W.A. (Niners Wit Attitude). Every member played a crucial role in our group’s successfulness whether serving as the Initiator all the way to the Opinion Seeker. Campbell’s roles included the Dominator, Standard Setter, Opinion Giver, and Joker. Sharoyal’s roles included Recognition Seeker, Aggressor, Opinion Giver, and Dominator. Sarika served as the Encourager, Contributor, Opinion Seeker, and Group Observer. Bria’s roles included the Initiator, Information Seeker, Information Giver, and Special-Interest Speaker. Brittany’s roles included the Group Observer, Follower, Help Seeker, and Information Seeker. I served as the Contributor, Information Seeker, Opinion Giver, and Compromiser. A few general tasks our group has accomplished include the recording of our music video for our Band Interaction Analysis, the product skit, and the creation of our “Shuttle Tracker 49thousand”. Our group selected the Symbolic Convergence Theory, because this theory was the most prominent in our opinion during my small group experience. The Symbolic Convergence Theory states; “communication shape a group’s identity and culture, which in turn influence other dynamics such as norms, roles, and decision making. Over time groups develop collective consciousness with shared emotions, motives, and meanings” (Beebe, 2012). A few major features I chose include; shared fantasies, emotions, motives, and meanings. Our theory is not necessarily better than any other theory, but more original than other theories. The Symbolic Convergence theory played right into the Individual Interaction Analysis 3 dynamics of our group, because most of the time we spent in meetings we discussed things we would accomplish and how we would accomplish them. That type of creative thinking allowed us to grow as a group and began to gain a sense of cohesiveness. However, prior to coming together our groups failed to compromise, instead we bickered over egotistic issues. We soon realized we suffered from ego-conflict which states; conflict that occurs when individuals become defensive because they feel they are being attacked. After our meeting to discuss issues we needed to work on as a group we realized that was a significant portion of conflict that served as a barrier to our group’s potential success. When our group initially formed we symbolically converged into two smaller groups within our small group, which lead to a lack of communication. The major features of this theory include norms, roles, leadership, goals, cohesiveness, and decision making. “Niners Wit Attitude” lacked a clear set of norms which is “the standard that determines appropriate and inappropriate behavior” (Beebe, 2012). One division of our small group felt that it was mandatory to show up to meetings approximately five minutes early, while the other division felt it was just fine to show up five minutes late. Another norm that seemed to be misinterpreted was turning the portion of the project that was assigned on the day that was established instead of when it was convenient. At the end of each meeting members...
tracking img