Preview

Indian Removal Act Dbq

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
792 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Indian Removal Act Dbq
• The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830
• The Indian Removal Act authorized the president to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders
• The Indian lands, located in parts of Georgia, Alabama, North Carolina, Florida and Tennessee, was valuable, and it grew to be more coveted as white settlers flooded the region.
• The Indian Removal Act opened up the lands to white settlement still held by Indians
• The five major tribes who were affected were the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole. They are known as the “Civilized Tribes”.
• One method was to adopt Anglo-American practices such as large-scale farming, Western education, and slave-holding. They adopted this policy of assimilation in an attempt to coexist with settlers and ward off hostility.
• This only made whites jealous and resentful.
• The law required the government to negotiate removal treaties fairly, voluntarily and peacefully: It did not permit the president or anyone else to coerce Native nations into giving up their land.
• The government sometimes violated both treaties and Supreme Court rulings to facilitate the spread of European Americans westward across the continent.
…show more content…
• The federal government promised that their new land would remain unmolested forever, but as the line of white settlement pushed westward, “Indian country” shrank and shrank. In 1907, Oklahoma became a state and Indian Territory was gone for good.

1. The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28: 1830
2. The five major tribes who were affected were the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole. They are known as the “Civilized Tribes”.
3. The law required the government to negotiate removal treaties fairly, voluntarily and peacefully: It did not permit the president or anyone else to coerce Native nations into giving up their land.
4. The government sometimes violated both treaties and Supreme Court rulings to facilitate the spread of European Americans westward across the continent.
5. In 1836, the federal government drove the Creeks from their land for the last time: 3,500 of the 15,000 Creeks who set out for Oklahoma did not survive the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    First, Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act. According to a page about Andrew Jackson Administration in the Zinn Education Project Cherokee/Seminole Removal Role Play,the Indian Removal Act was a law passed by Jackson forcing Natives to leave their land and move to Oklahoma. The purpose of this law was to get farmers more…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Jackson was out of office when the Indian Removal act was actually carried out, he had set its path into motion, and shares just as much credit for the act if not more than his presidential and ideological successor, Martin Van Buren. As Jackson saw it, the tribes were not part of the union, but sovereign nations, so why should they have any sort of protection from the federal government? The is the notable minority as stated earlier. Their land, unfortunately according to Jackson, belonged in and to the states they resided in. Jackson was also a strong supporter of…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Indian Removal Act authorized the president to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. The Trail of…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1838 and 1839 Andrew Jackson from Tennessee was forceful on Indian Removal, and from 1814 to 1824 jackson was instrumental in negotiating nine out of 11 treaties, which had devastated the southern tribes of their eastern lands in the west. So the Cherokee indians were tired of it so they went to the supreme court. The n in 1830 Jackson pushed a whole new piece of legislation called the “Indian Removal Act”. Jackson’s attitude towards the Native Americans came off as rude because he did not like the Indians and he wanted them gone.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Age of Jackson Dbq

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, dictating that all Indians living in the Deep South had to move to Eastern Oklahoma, because the Indians had something everyone else wanted, land. Jackson says in his First Inaugural Address,“It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy, and to give that humane and considerate attention to their rights and their wants which is consistent with the habits of our Government and the feelings of our people.” Jackson is saying that It will be his genuine and continuous desire towards the Indian tribes, and we want to give them a fair and open policy, and give humane and kind attention to their rights and their wants which is the same with the habits of our government and the feelings of our people. He wants to give the Indian tribes a good policy. Later on, he removes the Indian tribes from their homes in the Deep South and makes them march on the trail of tears, where they relocate to Eastern Oklahoma.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson treat Indians as suject of the United States, and he promoted the Indian Removal Acts because he believed removal could save the Indians from extinction instead of assimilation. Then, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 was passed, appropriating $500,000 to relocate eastern tribes west of the Mississippi which was a ethnic expulsion. Public were disagreed with this explusion, even…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Indian Removal Act took place in 1830, it promised to protect and forever guarantee the Indians lands in the West. The act involved the compromise between Jackson and the Native tribes west of the Mississippi river to be relocated so that he could take over their homelands. Now that the tribes were out of the way there was more land to settle on. Many of the Native Americans suffered from diseases and even starvation on their ways to their other destinations. The five major tribes affected were the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole. These were called The Civilized Tribes that moved into a more modern westernized culture. The Trail of Tears is a name given to the forced relocation and movement of Native American nations from southeastern parts of the United States following the Indian Removal Act of 1830. Now that the Indians were out of the way Jackson had planned to expand the United States and let it continue to grow. The growth of the country had then begun.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Choctaw Indians

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1830, the United States Government passed the Indian removal Act. This act called for Eastern Indians to be moved West to make room for white settlers. The Government then forced the Choctaw to sign the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cherokee Indians once settled in the Great Lake region of the United States. The Indians migrated south to the region which is now Georgia. Once settled in the south, the Cherokee tribe prospered. The tribe constructed a written language, built cities which included a capital city, and developed a constitution among the Cherokee people. When the White settlers began settling in the Cherokee lands, they showed much discrimination against the tribes. The settlers believed the Indians did not belong and they had the right to take over their lands. The tribe reached out to the government for assistance, but received no sympathy. The cry for help turned into a treaty to make the Indians move from their already settled homelands to areas west of the Mississippi River (Hicks, 2011).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The removal of American Indian tribes from lands east of the Mississippi River to what is now the state of Oklahoma is one of the tragic episodes in American history. Early treaties signed by American agents and representatives of Indian tribes guaranteed peace and the integrity of Indian territories, primarily to assure that the lucrative fur trade would continue without interruption. American settlers' hunger for Indian land, however, led to violent conflict in many cases, and succeeding treaties generally compelled tribes to cede large areas to the United States government.…

    • 4491 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Trail of Tears

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout Jackson's two terms as President, Jackson used his power unjustly. As a man from the Frontier State of Tennessee and a leader in the Indian wars, Jackson loathed the Native Americans. Keeping with consistency, Jackson found a way to use his power incorrectly to eliminate the Native Americans. In May 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed into law the Indian Removal Act. This act required all tribes east of the Mississippi River to leave their lands and travel to reservations in the Oklahoma Territory on the Great Plains. This was done because of the pressure of white settlers who wanted to take over the lands on which the Indians had lived. The white settlers were already emigrating to the Union, or America. The East Coast was burdened with new settlers and becoming vastly populated. President Andrew Jackson and the government had to find a way to move people to the West to make room. In 1830, a new state law said that the Cherokees would be under the jurisdiction of state rather than federal law. This meant that the Indians now had little, if any, protection against the white settlers that desired their land. However, when the Cherokees brought their case to the Supreme Court, they were told that they could not sue on the basis that they were not a foreign nation. In 1832, though, on appeal, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokees were a "domestic dependent nation," and therefore, eligible to receive federal protection against the state. However, Jackson essentially overruled the decision. By this, Jackson implied that he had more power than anyone…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One can argue that the taking of the land that by natural right belonged to these Indian tribes was unjust, and that the Jackson policy was against the Supreme Court rule, but like previously mentioned before, certain measures had to be taken in order for the United States to keep going onward and forward on its quest to becoming a great nation. Jackson, and many…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The central issue regarding the Indian Removal Act is land and how to make everyone who occupied that land or wanted to occupy that land happy. My opinion on this matter is that Jackson issued the Indian Removal Act so white settlers could have more land, and President Jackson could move the Indians farther west. The problem with this proposal is he did not follow the rules of the act. All the Indian tribes were supposed to be moved voluntarily by the signing of treaties, but in fact they were not. This resulted in one-fourth of Cherokee Indians dying because they had to pick up and move 800 miles west. There were lives lost from suffering from cold, hunger, and diseases such as pneumonia, tuberculosis, smallpox, and cholera. Today, we recognize this forced move as the Trail of Tears.…

    • 393 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When the Indians were being removed from their territory, they were lead out at gunpoint by our military. It’s immoral because there were 17,000 Indians and 4,000 died due to dehydration, starvation, and disease. The Cherokee had rights given to them. “They were granted their separate existence, as a political community, undisturbed possession and full enjoyment of their lands, within certain boundaries, which are duly defined and fully described and the protection of the United States against all in interference with, or encroachments upon, their rights, by any people, State, or nation,” argues a Maine Senator. The Indian Removal Act disregards every set of promises we have given to them.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The U.S got the Louisiana Territory in 1803. Then during his presidency, Andrew Jackson got Congress to pass the Indian Removal Act. This act stated that all Indians that wished to follow their own tradition must move to the Indian Territory where they would have more than 70,000 square miles of free land. When this act was passed, all Indians but the Cherokee signed the Treaty of Echota agreeing to move. Jackson thought it was necessary to take action against them to enforce the law. But the question is was the U.S justified in passing the Indian Removal Act forcing all Indians to move. I say no, the U.S was not justified in passing the act. The Indians have had a right to this land way before we did.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays