Preview

Indian Hegemonic Designs

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4183 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Indian Hegemonic Designs
INDIAN HEGEMONIC DESIGNS AND THE FUTURE OF KASHMIR

Introduction

1. India’s hegemonic designs have always generated intense academic, intellectual, and strategic interest and controversy. Historically, Indian expansionist psyche can be traced back to the concept of ‘Vishal Bharat’ or Greater India. Since its independence, Indian leaders have exhibited a distinct role consciousness - a deep seated desire to play a central role in the region and in due course assume the status of global power. Of late, the rapid build-up of Indian military muscle along with its ambitious nuclear and missile pursuits is also being viewed as a vindication of the role and status consciousness of India.

2. Most political scientists agree that Indian hegemonic attitudes have left indelible impression on her foreign and security policies. Is India, the land known for Gandhian non-violence and Hinduististic passivity and renunciation, really a hegemonic state? Is Kashmir linked to, or indispensable for realizing Indian hegemonic designs? A hegemonic state would not like to see a piece of land, howsoever disputed this may be, go out of its fold. This makes the search for a solution of the Kashmir issue that much more difficult. Is there, then, a solution of the Kashmir problem that would satisfy India, Pakistan, and the Kashmiri people, and not become a victim of the Indian hegemonic ambitions? I would hypothise that despite heavy odds there is a way out of this grueling impasse.

Aim

3. To explore the basis and manifestations of Indian hegemonic designs, their implications for Pakistan, future of Kashmir issue in this grand design of regional hegemony and proffering recommendations for the resolution of issue.

INDIAN HEGEMONIC DESIGNS

Historical Perspective

4. Hinduism preaches a life of passivity; Gandhi ostensibly stood for non-violence. The image of Hindus in general is that of a peace-loving and non-violent people. This has been disputed by scholars like Nirad C.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Andrew J Potter looks at the emerging relationship between the newly independent Republic of Indian and superpower that was the United States during the Cold War era in his book, Comrades at Arms: The United States and India, 1947-1964. It is, however, the angle from which he decides to look at this relationship that is most interesting. Rotter decides to look at this budding complicated relationship from a culture angle as, in his own words, “Like the rest of us, policymakers and diplomats do not shed their values, biases, and assumptions at their office doors. They are creatures of culture, and their attitudes cannot help but shape the policy they make.”…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hindus believe in living righteously and virtuously. Similarly, Christians believe that a person should treat everyone with kindness, even when others are being evil towards them. The Bible advises Christians should forgive endlessly. Also, “He recommended that we respond to violence with nonviolence. ““But I tell you who hear me: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, and pray for those who…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many think every problem can be resolved peacefully. Hindus especially think that every problem can be resolved peacefully because in Hinduism they believe in Ahisma. Ahisma is the respect for all living things and avoidance of violence towards others. Their belief in Ahisma makes them regard violence and war as a last option. Problems cannot be solved through war; war brings destruction which cannot be compensated for many years. No one likes to be always in danger of dying. No one wants to put the life of one’s children into danger. War should always be avoided unless it becomes inevitable. An example of a pious Hindu who strongly believed in Ahisma was Gandhi. Many agree with Gandhi because of the many things Gandhi accomplished through peaceful means such as, changing the way many South Africans saw Indians. This was a huge achievement because at the time racism was open and very commonly used. Gandhi never rioted, he only campaigned. In 1919 Gandhi became the “leader in the newly- formed Indian National Congress party”. Gandhi advocated passive resistance to British rules and submission to their aggression. He did not fight with the South Africans but did make it really clear that “he would go to jail or even die before obeying an anti-Asian law”, he also said that he was prepared to die but not kill. Some Indians argued at the time that it made them look weak but Gandhi said that by not fighting back they had the moral high ground. One of his famous quotes is: “an eye for an eye makes everyone blind” which implies that counter violence does not make it right.…

    • 956 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gandhi Philosophy

    • 3071 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Gandhi saw violence pejoratively and also identified two formsof violence; Passive and Physical, as we saw earlier. The practice of passive violence is a daily affair, consciously and unconsciously. It is again the fuel that ignites the fire of physical violence. Gandhi understands violence from its Sanskrit root, “himsa”, meaning injury. In the midst of hyper violence, Gandhi teaches that the one who possess nonviolence is blessed. Blessed is the man who can perceive the law of ahimsa (nonviolence) in the midst of the raging fire of himsa all around him. We bow in reverence to such a man by his example. The more adverse the circumstances around him, the intenser grows his longing for deliverance from the bondage of flesh which is a vehicle of himsa…3Gandhi objects to violence because it perpetuates hatred. When it appears to do ‘good’, the good is only temporary and cannot do any good in the long run. A true nonviolence activist accepts violence on himself without inflicting it on another. This is heroism, and will be…

    • 3071 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand a case of India and Pakistan, the two major countries in South Asia. They are still in a situation of cold war, where Kashmir is the bone of contention to achieving and marinating peaceful relations. Apparently it seems to be a far for religious success but the hidden reality is something different.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pardesi, Manjeet Singh. Deducing India 's grand strategy of regional hegemony from historical and conceptual perspectives (Singapore: NTU Press, 2005)…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Arguably the most important countries to consider when developing a comprehensive perspective on American foreign policy are newly industrialized countries (NICs). The United States deals much more with countries that have recently become industrialized due to their status as a rising economic power and, in turn, this aspect makes them prime candidates to analyze American foreign policy from their perspective. India, being the NIC with the highest real GDP growth rate of any current NIC, garners much attention from the United States and is the subject of several foreign policy changes that the US makes. This is precisely why I chose to use The Times of India as my scholarly source to research for this paper. India has much to tell us about the nature of American foreign policy with regards to the economic and political partnerships that the US and India enter…

    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The term nation has been envisioned variously by primordialists and modernists and is enmeshed in bewildering contradictions. In this paper it has been used to mean “ . . . not so much a cultural artifact . . . but a web of material relations and practices, which rests on classes, caste structures, gendered systems of production and reproduction, armies, laws, territories and yes, signifying practices as well.” (Ahmad 2007:40) The establishment of India as a nation-state upon Indian sub-continent not only conferred the people living within its political boundary a new overarching national identity of being ‘Indians’ above other ‘fuzzy’ identities based on caste, class, community but also brought in its wake the catastrophe of Partition that made the exclusionist and territorial aspects of nation-state quite evident. Sudipta Kaviraj in “The Imaginary Institution of India” explicates the idea of territorial demarcation of boundaries of the modern- nation state, as an imperative condition for enumerating its subjects in the process of nation formation for the purpose of administration and control. He also purports the…

    • 3422 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The report points out that in a situation where the world is no longer bifurcated…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gandhi 's non-violent individual can be described using the two concepts that are most important in his philosophy: ahimsa and satyagraha. Ahimsa, of course is the principle of non-violence. Mahatma Ghandi believes that the love of God or the Supreme Being must necessarily manifest in all of our actions. This means that we should practice non-violence. In Ghandi 's spiritual point of view, we have struggles that we need to fight internally. These are desires, fear, worry, and anxieties. But these fights should only occur inside; we should never involve ourselves with other beings.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Look East Policy

    • 3368 Words
    • 14 Pages

    “India’s Look East Policy is not merely an external economic policy, it is also a strategic shift in India’s vision of the world and India’s place in the evolving global economy. Most of all it is about reaching out to our civilisational neighbours in South East Asia and East Asia”-- Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh…

    • 3368 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    subversive pragmatic vision is increasingly challenging some of the key foundations of India’s traditional nationalist and left-of-center foreign policy, diluting the consensus that shaped the policy, and raising new possibilities especially for India’s relations with the United States and global nuclear arms control. This debate between two centrist foreign policy perspectives is not yet settled. The two are described here as ‘‘traditional nationalist’’ and ‘‘pragmatist,’’ with the former representing the established and dominant perspective, and the latter as the emerging challenger.1 Actual Indian policy mostly splits the difference, mouthing traditional nationalist (hereafter referred to as simply nationalist) slogans while following pragmatist prescriptions. One major result has been the widening of political space for closer relations with the United States, even without a stable consensus. These taxonomies are ideal types: it is very unlikely that those characterized as either nationalist or pragmatist would agree with or accept every tenet of these categories. The categorizations are designed to provide an outline of the competing lines of argumentation about Indian foreign policy, rather than identify nationalists or pragmatists per se. It also is important to note that it is difficult right now in India to associate these perspectives with particular political parties, think tanks, or ministries. Thus, these perspectives are individualistic and do not correspond to particular organizations. They do, however, represent the views of important public intellectuals, policy analysts, academics, journalists, diplomats, and government officials.…

    • 7865 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    jammu and kashmir issue

    • 1978 Words
    • 6 Pages

    BBA LLB UPES 2ND YEAR “Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding”.…

    • 1978 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    India Foreign Policy

    • 1923 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Every sovereign country has its foreign policy. India too has one. Foreign policy refers to the sum total of principles, interests and objectives which a country promotes while interacting with other countries. Even though there are certain basic features of a foreign policy it is not a fixed concept. The thrust of foreign policy keeps on changing according to changing international conditions. India’s foreign policy is shaped by several factors including its history, culture, geography and economy. Our Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, gave a definite shape to the country’s foreign policy. The Republic of India is the second most populous country and the world’s most-populous democracy and has one of the fastest economic growth rates in the world. With the world’s tenth largest military expenditures and eleventh largest economy by nominal rates or fourth largest by purchasing power parity, India is considered to be a regional power and a potential global power. It is India’s growing international influence that increasingly gives it a more prominent voice in global affairs. India has historically played a prominent role in several international organizations. It has a long history of collaboration with several countries and is considered a leader of the developing world. India was one of the founding members of several international organizations, most notably the United Nations, the Non-Aligned Movement, the Asian Development Bank and the G20…

    • 1923 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    East Pakistan

    • 3663 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Pakistan had a unique geographical feature. It consisted of two distinct blocks of territory. East Pakistan was not only separated geographically from West Pakistan by one thousand miles, but the departing land was India - a hostile neighbour, who from the day one did not recognise Pakistan’s existence. Hindu leaders gave statements at the time of Pakistan’s creation that it was a temporary division and very soon Pakistan will come into Indian fold again. For them, to execute their nefarious designs, keeping both sides divided and hostile, was the cornerstone of their hostile policy. Jinnah smelled the conspiracy even in 1940s and he had demanded ‘a corridor across India to connect the separated limbs of the new state’. But Mountbatten did not agree.…

    • 3663 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays