In What Ways Did The Arthurian Legend Differ From Known Facts?
In which fundamental ways did the Arthurian legend differ from known facts?
The place occupied by the King Arthur story seems to be midway between myth and reality. While early indications of his legend dating back to the sixth century, which correspond to the so-called Dark Ages of Britain, it has suffered such infinite variation to date that is virtually impossible to disentangle reality from fantasy.
The myth is situated in the 6th century, in Sub-Roman Britain, when the romans left the territory and the Saxons invade Great Britain. There is no historical data to contrast whether King Arthur existed or not, but the legend says he existed in the advanced Middle Ages but that is impossible because if he did existed it would have to have been a lot earlier. It was the authors of the medieval age, minstrels and troubadours that founded the myth attractive and transferred it to their time.
Due to the decline that England suffered following the abandonment of Roman Empire and the entry of the Saxon orders, any historical data that allows us to think that King Arthur existed disappeared, but what happens is that the authors of the Middle Age idealized the character. …show more content…
This figure of King Arthur could be of a king or a brilliant strategist trained in Rome and hired by the British kings to defend themselves against the invasion of the Saxons. This figure of king Arthur unified the British. This union ensures that there was peace in Britain; this peace was very close to convert for the first time Great Britain in a nation. With the disappearance of this "Arthur ", disappears the union and enter again into the black
The place occupied by the King Arthur story seems to be midway between myth and reality. While early indications of his legend dating back to the sixth century, which correspond to the so-called Dark Ages of Britain, it has suffered such infinite variation to date that is virtually impossible to disentangle reality from fantasy.
The myth is situated in the 6th century, in Sub-Roman Britain, when the romans left the territory and the Saxons invade Great Britain. There is no historical data to contrast whether King Arthur existed or not, but the legend says he existed in the advanced Middle Ages but that is impossible because if he did existed it would have to have been a lot earlier. It was the authors of the medieval age, minstrels and troubadours that founded the myth attractive and transferred it to their time.
Due to the decline that England suffered following the abandonment of Roman Empire and the entry of the Saxon orders, any historical data that allows us to think that King Arthur existed disappeared, but what happens is that the authors of the Middle Age idealized the character. …show more content…
This figure of King Arthur could be of a king or a brilliant strategist trained in Rome and hired by the British kings to defend themselves against the invasion of the Saxons. This figure of king Arthur unified the British. This union ensures that there was peace in Britain; this peace was very close to convert for the first time Great Britain in a nation. With the disappearance of this "Arthur ", disappears the union and enter again into the black