Preview

Important Aspects of Early Modern English Society

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
433 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Important Aspects of Early Modern English Society
Early modern England is a lot different to New Zealand in the early twenty first century. Almost every aspect of early modern English society contrasts greatly with New Zealand today. Three aspects where this contrast is especially pronounced are in the society was structured, the political make up of the country and the economy.
Society in Early Modern England was rigidly structured in a hierarchical system, in which God was at the top, and peasants and vagrants occupied the bottom slot. Society was also split in to two classes, those who governed, and those who were governed over. The governing class was made up of the nobility and the gentry. They controlled two thirds of England's land, but made up only five percent of the population. The other ninety five percent were the governed class. They included wealthy merchants lawyers and non-titled lawyers, although they were by far the minority. The majority were tenant farmers, landless labourers, paupers and vagrants. The structure was not completely set. You could move up in society, by a good marriage or getting land. You could also move down. Early Modern England was also a patriarchal society, in which women, of any class, were seen to be inferior to men.
Early Modern England was a monarchy. The monarch was advised mostly by his/her privy councillors, a group of advisers she/he elected themselves. The monarch also ruled with the aide of Parliament, who they called and dismissed themselves. Parliament gave the King or Queen advice, which they did not have to take. The Monarch and the Parliament made the Acts of Parliament, which were the laws. The monarch did not have complete rule over parliament; there were several things they could not do without parliaments approval, such as implement taxes. The political system was not reliant on democracy, rather patronage. Patronage is what we would today look at as bribery, but was then what kept the political system flowing. Patronage was given in return

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mr Griffen Murphy

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Societies view on women and their place during Victorian Britain was that of a second class citizen. The view of the time was that women were to marry and to look after their husbands interests. “Women in the Victorian society had one main role in life, which was to marry and take part in their husbands’ interests and business,” (Felicia Appell, Victorian Ideals: The Influence of Society’s Ideals on Victorian Relationships) the idea that a women’s role is that of to serve her husband is a sexist view and does not allow for women to have much control over their own lives. Typically, women were also not allowed to be educated or gain knowledge outside of the home because it was a man’s world. Instead of proper education women before marriage would learn housewife skills such as weaving, cooking, washing, and cleaning. A woman was educated in these areas as it was seen that the home was the right place for her and not to concern herself with other matters. “Her place was in the home, on a veritable pedestal if one could be afforded, and emphatically not in the world of affairs” (Richard D. Altick). One of the popular ideas of…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    In the beginning of this time period, there was an unmarried woman on the throne in England; she was Queen Elizabeth. Descended from royalty, this was the first time England had ever had a woman rule her people. Yet even with this remarkable step for women, the roles of women in society were still very much limited. Elizabethan England had very clear-cut expectations of men and women; men were expected to support the household, and women were expected to take care of domestic chores. Across the Atlantic Ocean, the colonies in North America were very much the same.…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    C. 653 Celtic church begins to spread Christianity among people living in the Severn Valley…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Us History Dbq

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Colonial American society was becoming less equal in the sense that the only real participants were a handful of rich aristocrats. And although being the smaller percentage of the population, they still ran the governments. The difference in the social ladder was divided between the Aristocratic and rich, and the slaves, servants, and Indians. The higher class was determined to create a large division between the two…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Upper class men held the power in many governments, including England’s, while women were considered to be of a much lower social standing.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social classes in the Elizabethan era were quite different than those we have today. These days we have a few generic classes that everyone gets grouped into. Back then, there were many diverse classes that you were basically born into. During this period, the main classes that people were separated into were The Monarch, Nobility, Gentry, Merchant, Yeomanry, and Laborers.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elizabethan Government

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Elizabethan government has its similarities and differences with the US government now. First, the courts of the Elizabethan era are very different from the US branches today. Secondly, crime and punishment was not as enforced in the Elizabethan era as it is today in the US. Third, the branches of the US government contradict the ideas of the Elizabethan monarchy.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Morality In The 1600s

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The world is full of activities, some of which leave a lot to wonder whether individuals value the concept of morality. Morality refers to the ability to do that, which is perceived right and universally acceptable. Morality plays a critical role in a person’s decision-making process. In Mark Twain’s story, “The Mysterious Stranger”, morality remains a common theme emphasized among the characters and forms much of the conversation in the story. The book gives a clear picture of the moral standards during the 1600s in Austria seen through the narration. In a way, the world has different, people falling in diverse groups. Much of what happens in the world draws down to personal moral standards that compel ethical behavior. The book talks about issues surrounding individuals and the factors that influence their moral standards.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the High Middle Ages of Europe, a particular argument over the appointment of churchmen turned into a general struggle for leadership in Christian society. During this time, Henry IV was emperor of Germany and Gregory VII was the Pope. The controversy between these men brought about many issues. In 1706, these issues are brought up in a long letter written by Henry IV. He addresses this letter to the Pope (Noble 250).…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though some people are on the bottom class and think they are left out they are still a part of a class which mean they do belong somewhere. For all of the groups men had more power and did more important jobs as women took care of the family and did household work. The North Americans had their social rankings dependent on gender and age. The West Africans had their social classes based on their family structure. They also believed that the older you are the more power you had. The Europeans based their social class on Monarchs and nobles held most of the wealth and power at the top of the hierarchy. At the bottom labored the peasants, who constituted the majority of the people. The nobility offered their peasants land and protection. In return, the peasants supplied the nobles with livestock or crops—and sometimes with military service. Within the social structure, few individuals moved beyond the position into which they were born. Most of the social classes are based on the family…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wealth in the eighteenth century was unevenly distributed between the classes. The public sphere was not as “public” as the name suggests, for the lower class and women were excluded. The government holding most the wealth and power over the land would impose harsh taxes that kept the rich wealthy and the poor in the lower class. “It is impossible to say what place the two privileged orders ought to occupy in the social order: this is the equivalent of asking what place one wishes to assign to a malignant tumor that torments and undermines the strength of the body of a sick person” (Sieyes.) One could label the lower class as “the sick” due to the constant stream of vile virus they were fed in the form of taxes, inequality, and negligence. The lower class peasants made up the majority of the population while the middle and upper class was made up of literate people that had access to an education and knowledge. The lower class had a disadvantage which was that the majority did not know how to read or write. Peasants were seen as the herd and got…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Manorialism gave the society a stable social order where each person knew their place in society. People believed that society functioned smoothly when individuals accepted their status and performed their proper roles.2 As a result, a person 's rights, duties, and relationship to the law depended on his or her ranking in the social order. This can be proven by the clergy of the time, "God himself has willed that among men, some must be lords and some serfs, in such a fashion that the lords venerate and love God, and that the serfs love and venerate their lord following the word of the Apostle; serfs obey your temporal lords with fear and trembling; lords treat your serfs according to justice and equity."2…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    colonies take root

    • 4027 Words
    • 17 Pages

    -Like most of Europe in the age of exploration, England was a monarchy. However, in England, the power of the king or queen was limited by law and by a lawmaking body called Parliament.…

    • 4027 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nobles had power and had great lives, but only 3% of England were nobles. Even though most of the population was poor, the lower classes in England were often uneducated. Life for the lower class was mainly working very hard to earn a moderate living.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Europe, most of the area used one main social structure. This is represented in my first pyramid. As you can see the kings are the most powerful, next come the nobles, then the knights, and finally the peasants. The box that has the word “church” in it to the side means that they had as much power as the kings and nobles. This society was based on the feudal system. It was mainly constructed for one reason, which was security. It was possible for everyone to move higher up the ranks of the pyramid. This is what most people aspired to do. England had a different social structure than this. It was made up of nobility at the top, next came the knights, then the largest class of population, the villanis, and finally the lowest class, the bordars. The two social structures were alike because they both had to do with the process of giving and keeping pieces of land to workers. The nobility played a big role in both social structures too. In the late middle ages, they wanted to centralize power so they expanded royal domain, set up systems of royal justice, organized government bureaucracies, built standing armies, and developed tax systems. This was very beneficial to Europe. These particular systems were probably in place because they were simple and easy to follow. In my opinion, I think that these social structures did work for Europe and England. I don’t think it could have been changed any better because it was already very organized and clear. Without these social structures, medieval Europe would not have been the same.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics