Preview

Ideal Ruler In Shakespeare's Henry V

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
489 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ideal Ruler In Shakespeare's Henry V
Henry V, the story of an idolised king in England who had defeated most odds was written by the legendary poet and playwright, William Shakespeare. Shakespeare had previously written about Henry V, yet had based it on his reckless and careless youth. In this play however, he portrays the growth of Henry to become the ideal ruler for England; viewing it by speaking of Henry’s plan to invade and rule France. This essay will further discuss Henry’s character in act 1.

Henry V is found to be compared to his old self in Act 1, “the courses of his youth promised it not.” This example was said by a Canterbury, a bishop, who admits his concern for England during Henry’s youth. He, as many others, believed that Henry’s wild acts had convinced them that he would not be a suitable king, viewing Henry as an immature figure, with no ruling technique whatsoever. He however, was proved wrong as Henry’s previous years had been considered to be a valuable lesson to him; “He comes o’er with our wilder days. Not measuring what use we made of them.” Henry sees his past as treasured mistakes, those that helped him see life as an
…show more content…
“Hear him but reason in divinity… you would desire the king were made a prelate.” This example portrays Henry’s knowledge in religion, having to be desired to be seen as a bishop by many people due to the use of his words. His clear speech is further observed as he speaks of Dauphin, “Tell the pleasant prince this mock of his hath turned his balls into gun-stones.” His tone had surprisingly been calm for a person who had just been insulted in front of his people, somehow inciting a rather powerful and scary figure. He sends a threatening message to Dauphin, his use of words had been creative as he changed a matter of humour to a menacing attitude. It is clear that his talent with language is an extraordinary quality that he possess, which happens to be a suitable characteristic for a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Henry VIII was ultimately unsuccessful in his aims from 1509-1514. He had three mains aims during this time and these were to secure the dynasty that Henry VII had created, assert his authority over his new kingdom and Foreign Policy, which Henry was planning to completely change. Various factors and traits contributed to this lack of success, which will be explored in this essay.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The successes of Henry VIII can be seen in his ability to keep and gain power and the force of his military efforts.To determine if Henry’s rule was a success, we must define what success means in the context of a ruler. This argument identifies the goals set forth by Henry, and his ability to achieve these goals. It’s also worthwhile to note the state and legacy that his rule left upon England. The reasons we can call Henry VIII’s reign a success will be laid out in his personal, political, religious and military accomplishments while on the throne. Henry’s reign can be defined by his ability to indulge in his desires. Whether that was to take and hold power, spend money on luxuries and war, or to consume more food in his later years. He had a number of personal desires beyond living a life of luxury, namely to have an male heir to the throne. Despite troubling history of marriage, he was successful in not only producing one heir, but three: Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I.Henry was successful in using fear to make those seeking to undermine think…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout the history of time, there have been many leaders of the world’s different civilizations. While each leader may have possessed different qualities: some strong, others weak; some righteous, others corrupt…each rule played an important part in shaping the culture of that civilization. Though not every civilization was governed by a leader that had a worldly impact, the rule of England under King Henry VIII, was one of great historical importance. Unlike many leaders of his time, Henry’s legacy was not forged under the motivation of power and greed, but by love and his desire to have a male heir. Henry VIII became the King of England in 1509 after the death of his father Henry VII. Like most kings Henry desired to have a male heir,…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare’s “Richard III” exists as a providential narrative in support of the Tudor Myth; that it was only through the divinely sanctioned rule of Henry VII that brought about peace after an era of turmoil under the reign of Richard III. As such, Shakespeare’s pro-Tudor bias highlights the politically and morally absolutist agenda of his time.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The power of the Nobility was the most important cause of unrest in the period of 1450 to 1470. ‘How far…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VIII pt. 2

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thomas Wolsey was Henry's most important minister early in his reign. Wolsey became Archbishop of York in late 1514, was created a cardinal of the Catholic Church the following November, and became Lord Chancellor of the realm in December 1515. Wolsey achieved singular stature in these offices. Since Henry was not so interested in administration as his minister, Wolsey took over many of the duties of kingship, overseeing England's finances and diplomatic relations with other European powers. Henry became extremely dependent on Wolsey, whose zeal and ability as an administrator made him indespensable. Among Henry's contemporaries on the European continent, many considered Wolsey to be the true ruler of England, since it was to him that foreign officials were often directed to address concerns meant for the English king.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Henry VII is known for his wise and sensible decisions while in power. Polydore Vergill, a historian, claimed that in government he was ‘shrewd and prudent’ and he was thorough during his ‘wise deliberation’. All of these admirable characteristics are ones that are needed for a leader in order for them to maintain a stable country. This is supported by the speech made at Henry’s funeral in 1509, made by John Fisher. Fisher claims that Henry VII’s ‘political wisdom in governance was singular’. Henry is also documented to have been very kind natured, mentioned repeatedly in both sources 1 and 2. ‘He was gracious and kind and was as attentive to his visitors… his hospitality was splendidly generous.’ This statement is evidence of how Henry treated his citizens and his fairness as a leader. John Fisher also described him as ‘goodly and amiable’. Another trait of Henry VII’s that is mentioned in these sourced are his intelligence. ‘His mind was brave and absolute’ and ‘his speech gracious in diverse languages’ prove henry’s intellectuality, which strengthen his ability to lead and be a good king. Vergil, the writer of Source 2, wrote his statement in during Elizabeth I’s reign. As Elizabeth was Henry VII’s granddaughter, this source could be interpreted as biased as he may have been trying to appease his queen- as offending her may have resulted in serious consequences. However contrary to this, the purpose of source 2 was to inform people of British history, meaning Vergill would…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dreamsong 29 Analysis

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “There sat down, once, a thing on Henry’s heart só heavy, if he had a hundred years & more… Henry could not make good”.…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This rebirth came after being embarrassed and humiliated by his marriages to Cleves and Howard. It is also important to recognise as Richardson does, that the reason the peace after 1545 is so uneasy is because of Henry’s achievements in war. No longer was there a balance in honour, therefore Francis was stuck in a peace he wanted to resolve - hence the continued sour relations that weren’t seen after the Field of the Cloth of Gold, which was otherwise similar in circumstances. The reason Henry VIII acted in such a reserved, and what has been interpreted as fearful way in 1539, was because of extent of the threat - the potential for a Catholic Crusade from a Habsburg-Valois alliance had a significant potential, in the wake of the Papal Bull of Excommunication against Henry VIII. Had the Treaty of Toledo been followed through it would have presented an existential crisis to the throne. However other explanations for his alliance seeking have been uncovered by McEntegart. He argues that, whilst security still remained a top priority, the king also had theological reasons for discussing with the Schmalkaldic League, exemplified by his considerations, at least on aspects of the Augsburg confession, in order to assist in creating uniformity in the Church. Furthermore he reveals the great plays of Cromwell’s faction in this period against the conservatives in order to further his heretical cause. This in turn led to Henry more closely seeking relations with the Schmalkalden as well as withdrawing from mainstream European politics. Security was secondary to honour, partially due to honour producing a security in its own right, at least in the eyes of Henry, but crucially due to the great focus that was still placed on the role of a chivalric and Godly…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nutt1

    • 1342 Words
    • 4 Pages

    "Henry V." Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Michelle Lee. Vol. 107. Detroit: Gale, 2007. Literature Resource Center. Web. 9 Feb. 2015…

    • 1342 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interestingly, Henry's combination of concrete and figurative language to describe different social situations creates an atmosphere of polarity. While a repetition of rhetorical questions exemplifies the king's frustration with sleep, King Henry's use of literary techniques portrays an elevated status, and his mutating tone displays a gradual rise in anger.…

    • 672 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry V Ethical Analysis

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It has never been agreed upon that life is an absolute right, but only that death is the absolute outcome. Philosophers call it a prima facie right, this right gets forfeited in actions such as aggravated murder, abortion, physician-assisted suicide, and other heinous crimes. However, the great western powers are on sure footing when it comes to this type of permitted murder, but a just war doesn’t make a total war acceptable. Williams Shakespeare’s play Henry V is loosely based upon England’s own ethical dilemmas in the early 1400’s. This is especially true when conflicting governments go into a war just because one side believes themselves to be in a just war the other may not.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The king Henry speaks a great majority in this play since he is aware of the power of his charisma and efficiency in which he transmits his messages. When a messenger delivers a box of tennis balls to Henry as an insulting reminder of his immature and irresponsible youth, Henry responds with a intimidating message. This is the moment when Henry officially…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Renaissance Dbq

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Amongst Henry's several undesirable traits, he allows himself to be partial by people who have ulterior motives. The most significant illustration of this is when the archbishops convinced Henry to take over France so it would allow them to be able to save resources for the Church. Henry doesn't accept responsibility for his actions, he places the blame on others. For example, before Henry begins to take over a French village, he instructs the governor to surrender or risk having English troops terrorize civilians. This way, if the governor declines, it would be the governor's fault for the atrocities that would occur. Henry has manipulated his troops to go along with these criminal acts using his most powerful tool - language. He tells the soldiers that what they're doing is noble, and that they should be proud; however, they're attacking another country in order to conquer it. Michel Foucault, in his article, Subject and Power, notes the reason for Henry’s irresponsibility’s when it comes to his position in power. He notes that it is no different than parents over children, psychiatry over the mentally ill, of medicine over the population (Foucault 781). These things need to exist because of the constructs of society. Moreover, Foucault notes that “this form of power applies itself to immediate everyday life which categorizes the individual, marks by his own individuality, attaches him to his own identity, imposes a…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cardinal Wolsey's Speech

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the speech from William Shakespeare’s Henry VIII Cardinal Wolsey has just lost his position as Advisor to the King. Wolsey’s reaction is a soliloquy filled with hate and bitterness where he conveys his complex emotions by using metaphors, the third person, diction, and tone.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays