Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Ice Calorimeter

Good Essays
1653 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ice Calorimeter
Abstract:
This report is a description of an experimental determination of the enthalpy of reaction of sulfuric acid in a reaction with magnesium to produce magnesium sulfate. Through the use of an ice calorimeter, the rxn H° D for this reaction is determined to be 1 360kJ mol − − × .
Introduction:
This report details an experiment in thermochemistry. Included are the methods, results, and interpretation of results of an experimental determination of an enthalpy of reaction. The reaction being studied is between sulfuric acid, and magnesium metal.
( ) ( H2SO4 aq +Mg s)®H2 ( g )+MgSO4 (s)
This reaction is run as an isothermal reaction, where the enthalpy change is measured by the change in volume of melting ice. Published values for the density of water, and ice, as well as the heat of fusion of water will be used to determine the amount of heat energy that is released by the reaction. The relationship between the changing volume of the calorimeter, and the amount of ice that is melted by the reaction can be expressed mathematically by the following expression. uantity of ice melted uantity of ice melted olume before rxn olume after rxn ensity of ice ensity of water
Q Q
V V
D D
− = −
In order to account for the natural melting of ice at room temperature, the data will be plotted on a coordinate system. A leastsquares linear regression will then be used to identify the equations of two lines, one representing the rate of ice melting prior to the addition of the sulfuric acid, and one representing the rate of ice melting after the reaction has reached completion. These equations will enable the determination of the volume change due to the heat produced by the reaction by use of basic analytic geometry.
Experimental:
Methods
An ice calorimeter is used to determine the change in volume of the water and ice. This consists of a beaker with a modified stopper. The stopper has holes in which a test tube, a graduated pipette stem, and a fill tube with petcock are firmly seated. The beaker is packed full of ice and water, the stopper is securely installed, and the entire assembly is packed in a bucket of ice. At this time 5 mL of chilled 1.00 M sulfuric acid is measured using a 5.00 mL pipet, and placed into the test tube installed in the calorimeter lid. Once theses preparations have been made, the
3
assembly is observed for a couple of minutes to ensure there are no apparent leaks. Once satisfied that the assembly is water tight, the stopwatch is started, and the initial pipet reading is recorded. Throughout the run, the pipet reading is recorded every 30 seconds. The volume is observed for 3 minutes to establish the normal melting rate of the ice. At this time, 0.209 g Mg(s) is added to the calorimeter in the form of solid ribbon cut into very small pieces. The reaction is allowed to run to completion while recording the pipet reading every 30 seconds. Once the change in volume over several consecutive time intervals is changing at the same rate as during the initial 3 minutes of monitoring, the reaction is assumed to be complete.
Data
Table 1. Change in calorimeter volume over time time(s) pipette reading(mL)
0 0.750
30 0.735
60 0.730
90 0.715
120 0.710
150 0.700
180 0.690
210 0.685
240 0.675
270 0.670
300 0.615
330 0.525
360 0.450
390 0.385
420 0.325
450 0.270
480 0.230
510 0.185
540 0.150
570 0.125
600 0.100
630 0.080
660 0.060
690 0.045
720 0.035
750 0.020
780 0.010
810 0.000
4
Figure 1. change in calorimeter volume over time
0.000
0.100
0.200
0.300
0.400
0.500
0.600
0.700
0.800
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 time (s) pipet reading (mL)
Figure 2. Projection of normal volume change y = -0.0003x + 0.7463
R2 = 0.9901 y = -0.0004x + 0.3095
R2 = 0.9944
-0.100
0.000
0.100
0.200
0.300
0.400
0.500
0.600
0.700
0.800
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 time(s) pipet reading(mL)
Results:
The heat of the reaction in the test tube caused some of the ice in the calorimeter to melt. This resulted in a decrease in the total volume of ice and water. The change in volume is shown in the figure 1, plotted against the elapsed time at each reading.
The data points occurring before the magnesium strips were added to the acid, as well as the last 5 points, which represent the normal rate of ice melting after completion of the reaction, are evaluated using a least-squares linear regression. This yields the equations of two lines. The slopes of these lines represent the rate of ice melting before and after the reaction, as shown in figure 2.
5
These equations are now evaluated at the approximate midpoint of the reaction. For these calculations, time=500 seconds will be used. The volume change will be the difference in y between the two equations.
( )
( )
( )
1
1
.0003 500 .7463 .5963
Where 500
.0004 500 .3095 .1095 br ar y mL s s mL x s y mL s s mL


 = − × + =
= 
= − × + = 
Now subtract to find the change in volume caused by the reaction. .5963 .1095 .487 br ar y − y = mL − mL = mL
Now, the quantity of ice that was melted can be determined using the formula given in the introduction. The values for the densities of ice and water will be required for this calculation. These were found in the
CRC Handbook1, and are as follows:
( ) 1
2 H O l @0 C=.99987g mL− × 
( ) 1
2 H O s @0 C=.917g ml − × 
Now these values will be applied to the equation. uantity of ice melted uantity of ice melted olume before rxn olume after rxn ensity of ice ensity of water
Q Q
V V
D D
− = −
1 1 .487
.917 .99987
Q Q mL g mL g mL − −
= −
× ×
1 1 1
.99987 .917 .08287
.91688079 .91688079 .91688079
Q Q Q g mL g mL g mL − − −
= − =
× × ×
( ) 1 .487mL .91688079g mL .08287Q − × =
.4465209447
5.39
.08287
g
Q = = g
Now, the heat of fusion of water will be used to determine the amount of heat that is released by the reaction.
2
79.72
H O = fusion cal H g D
Now convert to Joules per gram.
6
79.72 cal 4.184
1
J g cal
× 1
2 333.5 of H O fusion J g H − = × = D
This reaction transferred heat to the surroundings. This makes the reaction exothermic, so the enthalpy change will have a negative sign.
5.39 g 333.5
1
J g −
× = −1.80×103 J
Now the chemical equation is presented for the reaction of sulfuric acid and magnesium to produce magnesium sulfate. This will be the first step to calculating rxn DH for this reaction.
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 4 2 4 H SO aq +Mg s ®H g +MgSO s
The equation is balanced with all coefficients equal to 1, therefore,
1 mol of reactant will produce 1 mol of product. The molar mass of magnesium is now used to determine the amount of Mg available for the reaction. 1 .209
Mg=24.31g mol g mmass − ×  1
1 24.31 mol g
× 3 8.60 10 mol − = ×
Now, the volume and molarity of sulfuric acid is used to determine the amount available for the reaction.
1mol
L
1L
×
1000 mL
5mL
× 3 5.00 10
1
mol − = ×
It is now apparent that magnesium is in excess, and there are
3 5.00 10 mol − × of the limiting reactant. Due to the 1 to 1 ratio of reactant to product, there should also be 3 5.00 10 mol − × product. This quantity will enable us to establish rxn DH for the reaction.
3 1.80 10 rxn J
H
− ×
D = 
3
1 1
1 5.00 10 1000 kJ mol J −
× ×
×
1 360kJ J − = − ×
Discussion:
Recall that the purpose of this experiment was to attempt to measure the reaction enthalpy of a given reaction. In this case, by measuring the amount of heat absorbed by the ice in the chamber, we can determine the amount of heat that was released in the reaction. By measuring precisely, we can measure the heat given off by a small amount of reactants, and use that information to determine the heat of the reaction in the standard units. The results of this experiment determined the rxn DH of the reaction of magnesium and sulfuric acid to form magnesium sulfate and hydrogen gas to be 1 360kJ mol − − × .
7
Published data could also be used to determine the heat of this reaction. In this case, though, this data will be used to check the accuracy of experimental results. This is simply done by using the published values2 for the DHF of sulfuric acid and magnesium sulfate to determine the standard heat of reaction. Remember that water and hydrogen gas are in their standard states and have F DH values of 0.
( )
( )
( )
2 4
2
tan
H SO 814
MgSO 1278.2
1278.2 814 464.2 f f rxn f f
H products H reac ts H
H kJ mol H kJ mol kJ mol D − D = D
D = −
D = −
− − − = −
   


Here we can see that by using published values for the standard heats of formation of the compounds used in the experiment, we can calculate the standard state heat of reaction for this reaction. Compared with these values, the results of this experiment deviate from the calculated book values by 22.45%.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    6.03 Calorimetry Lab

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Approximately 40 mL of the ionized water was added to the 100 mL beaker, then in a 10-mL graduated cylinder, 5-mL of HCl was measured then added to the 100-mL beaker of water. The 100 mL beaker was then placed on the assembled ring stand.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Clean, rinse, and fill a buret with NaOH solution just as you did in last week's experiment. Record the molarity of the NaOH and the initial NaOH volume reading from the buret (+0.02 mL).…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    6.03 Calorimetry Lab

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this lab, we dissolved a calcium-enriched tablet and participate the calcium ion as calcium carbonate. Our purpose is to determine the masses of calcium carbonate and calcium ion, to determine the mass percent of calcium ion in the tablet and to compare the masses and the percent with the listed tablet ingredients. This time we used a 150mL beaker, analytical balance, forceps, a 50mL graduated cylinder, a glass rod, beaker tongs, a hot plate, two 16 x 125-mm test tubes, centrifuge, a medicine dropper, a filter paper, a filter funnel, a 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask, a watch glass, a drying oven, a spatula and a red litmus paper. The chemicals we need were 20mL of 2.0M HCl, a calcium-enriched tablet and 25mL of 1.0M Na2CO3 solution.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    6.03 Calorimetry Lab

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Figure 1: Titration curve of 0.160 grams of an unknown diprotic acid that was dissociated in distilled water. Shown is the pH versus the volume in milliliters of 0.1 M NaOH, a strong base, added to the solution. The initial pH reading of the solution was a pH of 2.60. Although the pH of the ½ equivalence point was unknown, it could be estimated by halving the volume of NaOH used at the first equivalence point. At the first equivalence point, 13.63 milliliters of NaOH had been added to the unknown acid solution.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    We can assume that the specific heat capacity of water is 4.18 J / (g × °C) and the density of water is 1.00 g/mL.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    6.03 Calorimetry Lab

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Class average for a 80 and 120 drop count was recorded to be 0.041+/- 0.005 mL/drop. If a graduated cylinder is not available there is another way of adding more of the solution. The disposable pipet can transfer 0.5mL of the solution to the chemical reaction. When comparing a 10mL graduated cylinder, a 100mL beaker, and a 50mL graduated cylinder, the most precision peace of glass wear would be the 10 mL graduated cylinder with the true volume of water (calculated), class average, and uncertainties being 9.7896 +/- 0.05mL. The 50mL graduated cylinder comes in second place with a true volume of water(calculated), class average, and uncertainties being 50.0001 +/- 0.22mL. The third peace of glassware coming in as the least accurate would be the 100 mL beaker with a true volume of water(calculated), class average, and uncertainties being 59.9999 +/- 0.82mL.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    6.03 Calorimetry Lab

    • 5075 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Your teacher will demonstrate for the class the reaction of metallic copper with concentrated nitric acid, HNO3. This must be done in the fume hood. (Caution: Avoid breathing poisonous gases. Avoid contact of skin with nitric acid. It burns skin and clothing.) One student will be asked to feel the side of the demonstration beaker and report to the group. The products formed are copper(II) nitrate solution, Cu(NO3)2(aq), and nitrogen dioxide gas, NO2(g).…

    • 5075 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Start off by weighing two paracetamol tablets using some accurate scales. Record the mass down (1.15g). This had to be as accurate and precise as we could get it so we had the correct weight to start the experiment. Without this then the results we found at the end would not be accurate. A problem that could be faced with this is that the scales may not have been fully set to zero. Also it takes time for it to fully reach its weight on the reading so you may move them too quick before the right weight has been set.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    6.03 Calorimetry Lab

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Add 50 milliliters of the solution you want to test to the beaker and record its mass. The mass of the solution is equal to the total mass minus the mass of the beaker.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    6.03 Calorimetry Lab

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the first process of the lab, you measure the mass of water transferred from a buret to a beaker, to determine the experimental mass of the water, and the volume of the water collected. We measured the temperature of the water so we could calculate the density of the water, which enabled us to calculate the actual volume of water, by using the density and the measured volume of water. To determine the percent error, we had to subtract the actual volume of water by the experimental volume of water transferred from the buret to the beaker, and then divided it by the actual volume and multiplied it by 100. In the second process, you perform the same steps you did for the buret, but instead, you use a 5.00mL or 10.00mL pipet. You repeated each…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    6.03 Calorimetry

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1.) m = mass of water = density x volume = 1 x 26 = 26 grams…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chem notes

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    C2H5OH (l) + 3O2 (g)  2CO2 (g) + H2O H = -1.37 x 103 kJ…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Antifreeze Lab

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    *Check the test tube every few seconds until frozen. Record temperature. Repeat with both antifreeze solutions…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    3.03 Calorimetry Lab

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the wonders of this planet is water. Water makes up 65% of humans, and 70% of the Earth. It is also common knowledge that humans cannot survive three days without it. Water is essential. If almost three-fourths of Earth is made up of water, why are there still so many people in the world suffering from a lack of it?…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Honey bees

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tf = 57.95 oC, Hfus = 74.047 kJ mol-1, and M = 270.5 g mol-1. ΔTf = Kf m…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics