Resolved: Private sector investment in human space exploration is preferable to public sector investment. "That's one small step for man; one giant leap for mankind". –Neil Armstrong Giant leaps for mankind will not be possible in this economy. Public sector investments are preferable in the human space exploration branch. To clarify the resolution I offer the following definitions: -Human Space Exploration: the investigation of physical conditions in space and on stars, planets, and other celestial bodies through the use of artificial satellites satellite, artificial, object constructed by humans -Preferable: more desirable or worthy than another; preferred -Public Sector Investment: the part of an economy that consists of state-owned institutions, including nationalized industries and services provided by local authorities -Private Sector Investment: the part of a country's economy that consists of privately owned enterprises First, there is a widespread agreement among the public and private sector investments that NASA does not have the resources to do all of the things it has been asked to do. Truth be told, there is not much confidence among these sectors that the political process within Washington will give NASA what it needs to succeed. The government does not have enough money to consistently fund the space exploration in public sector due to the budget deficit the United States is currently facing. In private sector investments, the money would be coming in consistently. The time for businesses to take over is now. According to space policy consultant Jim Muncy, the $500 million Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program, a private sector investment, represents a breakthrough in NASA, towards space operation. It offers the private sector a chance to do what only Russia does now: resupply the International Space Station. By resupplying the International Space Station, the human...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document