Preview

Human influence on species evolution

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
438 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Human influence on species evolution
Human influence on species evolution

Greed is a capital sin, but many businessmen do not care about that in order to raise their profit. Thus people who earn money by hunting animals always aim at the biggest and most superb ones. By looking at the nature, one can recognize that the predators usually take either the very young or the weak animals. First it sounds like an insignificant difference, but the effect of it is disastrous. Nearly every creature adapts to changing circumstances and so do the hunted animals. Once it was an advantage for them to be big and strong to fight their enemies, but since humans hunt exact this kind of animals it became an enormous problem for them. This is why the nature started an evolutionary change in order to prevent the animals. The result is that many animals are now able to reproduce much earlier and that the total size of them declined significantly.

Of course, these are very bad facts, but there is a ray of hope. Researchers found, that all these effects will revert to the past if people would not hunt the biggest and healthiest animals anymore. Unfortunately, it takes about twelve generations to return normal in size and reproduce behavior. By taking the life expectancy of some animals into account, it means that for some species the recovery time might be more than 50 years.

It is sad that humans pose a threat to Earth’s flora and fauna. We have got only one planet and we have to share it with every creature. Of course, a lot of people earn money by using animals in several ways and thus we all have many benefits. Nevertheless, we have to find a middle course between using Earth’s flora and fauna and generation of turnover. If we do not counteract this trend, in the long run all the wonderful animals will disappear and we would even have much bigger problems. A life without animals is for humans virtually impossible or at least a tremendous change for our consumption in several ways. So we see, that if we

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Think for a minute that the wolf population doubled in size. Looking at graphs, we see that with the current population of wolves in Yellowstone, we have seen that the population of Elk have a decrease of more than 50%. If the wolf population were to double, I can only infer…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Food Web Case Study

    • 1008 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Because these animals have mates to take care of, children to feed, and the need to protect what is theirs comes a whole new definition of the word competition. Many competitors within the food chain can at times be after the same…

    • 1008 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Three effects of over hunting wolves are the following. Elk populations grew because the predatory pressure was taken off of them. Also because the elk did not have any pressure on they began not to move around slot leading to weaker willow stands. Finally, because of this overpopulation, populations of birds have been decreasing because of these overpopulations birds do not have shelter or food.…

    • 68 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    There was a time when man killed animals for food, clothing and shelter. Now people kill animals for trophies and to stroke their egos for bragging rights. “Every year, tens of thousands of wild animals, representing hundreds of different species, are killed by American trophy hunters in foreign countries” (“Trophy Hunting”). “The heads, hides, tusks, and other body parts of most of these animals are legally imported to the United States by the hunters” (“Trophy Hunting”). “Many animals imported as trophies are members of species protected under the Endangered Species Act, such as leopards and African elephants” (“Trophy Hunting”). These facts provide evidence that…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Canned Hunts

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. habitat destruction and fragmentation: when we build houses, roads or freeways, we break up their natural roaming areas. Then, it's harder for them to find mates and reproduce = death. Also, they get killed trying to cross roads by fast moving cars = death. Further, when the habitats are smaller, there's a smaller gene pool. You get inbreeding, which leads to poorer genes and higher susceptibility to diseases and environmental changes. One example of this is the cheetah: they're virtually identical…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Also they had hunted so much of these animals that there was no more to be hunted. around this time period the weather on the earth started to become warmer and the glaciers melted as well as the levels of the seas started rising.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is explained well in the ‘Benefits of Hunting Deer’ section on ehow.com. If you think about it, if the deer population increases, then the predators that prey on deer will thrive due to good food supply. Even more accidents happen to things that prey on deer! It might not be as much, but it is still an unneeded thing. Also, increasing any animal’s population will cause it to spread out to different areas for habitat. One of these places may be a city where people are everywhere. Needless to say there are very stupid people in this world and they will do stupid things to animals. Any animal is not afraid to defend itself and you would be surprised at their strength. People could get very hurt being so up close and personal to animals. Therefore, decreasing deer population also decreases predator count; decreasing accidents, money lost, etc.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humans are making the lives of animals harder and easier. Our expansion can interfere with species native to an area, forcing that species to to die out, leave, or change. Overhunting can hit a species hard because it gives little time to react. Although some can. For example, some elephants, valued for their ivory tusks, have started to produce offspring without tusks. These as a result are ignored by hunters. Overfishing is a big problem, as fisherman do not simply want a certain part of the fish. The biodiversity in freshwater habitats has declined by fifty percent in the last thirty…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many majestic animals have been the targets for poachers, and poachers, being the dumb people they are, don’t know the difference between animals they can and can’t hunt, and end up making them extinct! Hunting is interfering with nature, and at this rate, we will continue to make many species extinct! Some may see hunting as a way of removing overpopulated animals, but there are none of those right now! Hunting not only hurts animals, but it will end up hurting ourselves as well!…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When humans first crossed the Beringia land bridge, they were in a place full of animals that have never experienced humans before. Megafaunals are mainly very large and slow moving animals which made it very easy for humans to hunt them. Due to the fact that they were so easy to hunt, humans were able to hunt them with minimal effort. Because they were being hunted so often, they were unable to reproduce quick enough in order to build their species and keep up with the humans. “This abundance of food stimulated human population growth, which hastened the megafauna extinctions. That hunting was a key factor in causing the extinctions is suggested by finds of kill sites where huge heaps of bones have been discovered at the base of cliffs, over which stampeded herds seem to have been driven“(Whyte,1)”. The humans took full advantage of the new found food source. They used their hunting skills to actually herd animals to their death to maximize their food supply. With a growing human population, there was more of a demand for food. The megafaunals were there in abundance for the humans to hunt. Humans had a hand in the megafaunal extinction because “The argument is simply that prehistoric human hunting dramatically modified animal communities, and had humans not colonized the planet, most of the species that suffered extinction during the Pleistocene and Holocene would still exist today”(Surovell,2). Therefore, megafaunals dwindled down over the years until they eventually went…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Variation Within Population; differences in size, shape, physiology and reproductive abilities. Evolution requires variation within the population.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Overpopulation

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wild animal overpopulation can have some devastating effects on human life. Too much wildlife can hurt economy, make people sick, cause human injury or even death, and ruin vegetation. Hunting has been a way of life since the beginning of time. Native Americans have hunted to feed their tribes and rituals of children to become men. Dinosaurs used to hunt in order to survive. As for other animals, hunting is their way of life. It was a major part of ancient life and practices are still being used today. To hunt is a very important tool for survival and to maintain control of wild animal overpopulation. If there was ever an outbreak of wild animals like deer and boars would destroy everything in their path.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Endangered Species Act

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages

    citizen that saving Earth's endangered species from extinction should be a national concern. Thanks to the press, over the years, a lot of people seem to have gained a general ethical and scientific understanding of the value of biological diversity. This biological diversity, or biodiversity, is a concept that emphasizes the fragile nature of the genetic and social interrelationships of the many varieties of plant and animal life that can be found in any given ecosystem (DiSilvestro, 1993). If one species vanishes, the entire ecosystem may be affected by the loss, in a possibly devastating chain reaction that current science does not presently have the ability to fully predict the outcome…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The common reason for why there are so many poachers hunting rare animals is that high class society will often pay ridiculous amounts of money for the delicacy or luxury that the animal offers.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wildlife Animals

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If you were of the opinion that cultivated plants and domesticated animals is what wildlife consists of, you are mistaken. Wildlife, in fact, comprises of the innumerous varieties of wild plants, animals, fungi and microorganisms that exist on our planet earth, rather than just cultivated plants and domesticated animals. Knowingly or unknowingly, we largely depend on this wildlife for every elementary requirement in our life. The food we eat, the clothes we wear, the medicines we consume, a variety of building materials used for construction, numerous chemicals used for manufacturing our necessities, all are extracted from the wildlife existing around us. A study by the American Association for the Advancement of Science indicates that as many as 40,000 species of plants, animals, fungi and microscopic animals benefit us in some way or the other. To know the various benefits that this wildlife provides us, read on further.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays