The Definition of Human and Cloning
Human: a living person that possesses character and individuality(a questionable definition in the presence of cloning).The unresting attention on biology and genetics has finally contribute to the development of human cloning, an addition to scientific achievements yet an unforgettable scar in life. Through constant research and experimentation on countless animals, the present generation of scientists can now use artificial methods to create a duplicate of natural life. Why? Regardless of producing an identical, an exact copy of another living human being for unreasonable excuses like organ transplants, the process of human cloning conflicts with religious beliefs, brings harm to the clone, and questions human identity. Human life is a delicate balance and cloning goes against the society that is reliant on personal beliefs and collides with the moral ethics within humanity.
Religious viewpoints resembles a person’s beliefs and morals. Regardless of how well-developed or how popular human cloning will become, it stands against the beliefs of religious followers. According to a Christian viewpoint, “Genesis 1:26-27 asserts that man is created in God’s image and likeness and is unique among all creations.” Based on Muslim ethics, “Islam’s holy book, the Koran, states that the creation of human beings results from the joining of the reproductive seeds of a husband and wife. Reproductive cloning, which bypasses this union, is therefore considered unnatural and in opposition to Islam.” In the Hindu world, “All cloning research violates a fundamental principle of Hinduism: doing no harm to other creatures. Animal cloning experiments, during which a large percentage of the clones die prematurely or have serious birth defects, obviously violate this principle.” Christian, Muslim, and Hindu arguments on human cloning demonstrates global opposition. The world cannot operate human cloning when religious believers scattered around...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document