Preview

How Was Napoleon Able To Win So Many Battles In The Napoleonic Wars?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1034 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Was Napoleon Able To Win So Many Battles In The Napoleonic Wars?
How was Napoleon Bonaparte able to win so many battles in the Napoleonic wars?

Napoleon Bonaparte was able to win many battles in the Napoleonic wars because of his army size and the superior tactic and strategy he used. Those were the main reasons for many of napoleon’s military victory against the other European countries. France was also the biggest country with the biggest population through out Europe making it easer to mobilize an army. Napoleon graduated form Ecole Militaire with the rank of second lieutenant in artillery. He was sent south a few years later where he had to put down a group of rabbles, he did it by destroying the British naval fleet in the battle of of Toulon 1744, this was Napoleon first major victory and was the
…show more content…
strategy of indirect was Napoleon favorite offensive strategy and he would often use it to over overwhelm the enemy’s forces, they were use to win battles in Ulm in 1805, Jena in 1806, and Friedland in 1807. Napoleon strategy of the center position was used to hold his army in place while reinforcements arrive or to defend a city or position from a larger army, this were use with success in his campaign against Austria 1809 and in Belgium 1815. Napoleon strategy of indirect out flanks the enemies forces at a faster and more efficient rate compared to other flanking strategy as his army would position it self right behind the enemy before moving in from the fount and the rear over overwhelm the enemies force. The Strategy of the central position was napoleon favorite defending strategy often use to hold his ground and splitting the enemy’s forces in to two groups before attacking one of them. those two Strategy that Napoleon used proved to be very effective when they were timed right usually winning battles that his army was out numbered in. Napoleon was also aggressive in the battle field often using aggressive and fast maneuvers on the battle field, trying his best to out flank his enemies morale. This was an effective tactic especially if there was a need to win a fast and decisive victory this tactic was used in the of Battle …show more content…
They are also able to live of the land which meant they were able to hunt for their own food instead of waiting for supplies, this would prove to be useful tactic used by the French army. The army men were hardly hungry and often able to march at a faster time, as they did not need to wait for supply before their next march. An example of the Napoleon’s grand army fast marching speed, would be in the battle of Battle of Austerlitz 1805. Napoleon right flank had to march 112KM in less then 48 hours and was able out flank the enemies’ armies splitting them apart and attacking them one by one, that was the winning strategic move commanded by Napoleon and his generals which led to his victory against the Russian’s and the Austrian’s armies. Napoleon also had the support of the Prussian and Austrian army in 1812, with the combined strength of 680,000 (wikipedia)men they were able to out number the Russian main army. Battle of Smolensk and Battle of Borodino in 1812 are examples of napoleon’s victories by out numbering his enemies. Napoleon also grouped his armies in to crops, crops were independent military group containing cavalry, artillery and infantry, and capable of defending against a superior force until reinforcements arrived. It was proven to be an effective strategy and was often used to divide and conquer cities and countries to stop the enemies reinforcement

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte was the first emperor of France from 1804 to 1814. He is famous for his efforts to form a connected Europe that France would lead. His career as a military and political leader led to many big accomplishments, but unfortunately he became too greedy over time leading to his exile.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eulogy of Napoleon

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Napoleon was the most detail oriented and dominant person I knew. Due to these traits he became a phenomenally successful leader. Napoleon was also very charismatic. He always had a special charm, which resulted in him climbing the “military ladder” so quickly, so to speak. He was also a very manipulative person, but not in the horrendous way. He was able to use his persuasive abilities to gain trust and support of the citizens of France and the military. Out of all the positive traits that made Napoleon successful, I truly believe that it was his overall intelligence that provided him such great accomplishments. He always loved to read, especially through his teen years, which led him to create a love of attaining knowledge.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon first built his empire by gaining fame and recognition through military achievements in the French army. He then rose to political power through a coup d’état when he overthrew the Directory and took the title of first consul after a plebiscite was held. Later, in 1804, Napoleon crowned himself emperor of France. He built his empire in Europe by using money from the sale of the Louisiana Purchase to fund his government. He then continued to gain victories in battles against Britain, Russia, Austria, and Sweden, giving him dominance over Europe. The only major battle he lost was the Battle of Trafalgar.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jomini when describing the principles of war he makes the argument that “To throw by strategic movement the mass of an army, successively, upon the decisive point of a theater of war…” (Jomini, pg70). Clausewitz makes it clear that war is serious and therefore a country cannot limit their war effort saying, “He who uses his forces ruthlessly, shrinking from no amount of bloodshed must gain an advantage if his adversary does not do the same,” (Clausewitz pg 265). Both of these men learned many of ideas of military success came from the Napoleonic wars. The French under Napoleon’s regime shows the way in which a population that practices total war principles, an army in mass and ruthless no prisoners policy, would be able to defeat any army that does not also practice this same mentality. Napoleon incorporated both the ideas of strategic movement with those of principles of ruthless military campaign.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon's once unequaled army was now diminishing. After defeats in Spain and misfortune in Russia, countries began to realize that Napoleon's "invincible" reputation was tainted. For the first time people saw that this "unstoppable" general could, in fact, be stopped. Momentum and hope were gained by all of Napoleon's enemies. In 1813, Napoleon was in his German campaign. However, because of the Peninsular war, he was unable to send troops causing them to be 200,000 troops short. This created even more casualties and death for Napoleon, as he could just stand and watch his empire fall. Even more enemies were gathering against Napoleon, sensing his newfound weakness. Austria, Britain, Russia, Prussia and Sweden all joined forces to fight against Napoleon. Napoleon's forces were now by far outnumbered by this new alliance and he was barely holding on. Eventually, the allies would attack Paris and take the city. When Napoleon returned and heard of the defeat he knew it was the end. Finally realizing that his unstoppable armies had been stopped for good he abdicated on April 11th, 1814. The Peninsular War has helped diminish Napoleon's armies and expose his weaknesses. His enemies had finally caught on and in the end it was the great Napoleon who finally gave…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Flyer project

    • 322 Words
    • 1 Page

    Napoleon brought positve vibes and effects, when he and his gunners had welcomed thousands of royalists with a cannonade. Therefore, that sent the attackers in panic and confusion. He then became "Hero of The Hour." He was then hailed throughout the city of Paris as a savior of the French Republic. 1796 Napoleon led a French army against forces such as Austria, and the kingdom of Sardinia. Young Napoleon won remarkable sets of victories, but that of course wasn't going to last for long, when his army was pinned down in Egypt, and the British defeated his forces. However, Napoleon kept stories about his wars that had been out of newspapers and he remained a hero of France.…

    • 322 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another major factor as to why the French force was successful during this time period was the quality of its soldiers, most important trait being the high moral and belief in the idea of both the French Republic and Napoleon. The command, control and organization of the army was a vital asset into explaining its’ success during this time. Societal factors are also apparent when evaluating the reasons for success of Napoleon’s force during these wars. Adoption of conscription and the development of the doctrine of total war would mean that war involved the entire of a nation’s society. The most important factor however would be the individual leadership qualities of Napoleon himself, being able to use the other factors together in order to obtain the victories during the first five coalition wars. Nevertheless French success can also be credited to the failure of the coalition powers in the majority of these factors and the lack their lack of military…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout time, the history of Napoleon is retold over and over again. His conquests of Europe are legendary. He is considered one of the greatest military leaders, his victories are widely known, yet people seem to forget his losses. Napoleon had many domestic and diplomatic/military achievements, some were great and others were his worst blunders.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were several major success that led to Napoleon rising to power. His first big promotion came in 1793 when he took land back from the British. This was just the beginning of his military success. After this, he stopped the supporters of the king from rising, and was appointed commander of the Army of the Interior. When the war with Italy began Napoleon quickly swept through and conquered territory for France. After this he moved on to conquer lower Egypt. He helped build hospitals for the poor and reorganized the system for collecting taxes.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He wants to keep their spirits up in hard times and let them know they aren’t just away from their family and friends for nothing. They are there for a bigger purpose. “He sought to inspire his troops by appealing to their honor, their vanity, and their love of France” (117). Bonaparte used propaganda by mixing it into his warfare style. “By rapid marches, Napoleon would concentrate a superior force against a segment of the enemy’s strung-out forces”…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    France was also in a state where they desperately needed a system of order, they are in a midst of a revolution with no one taking charge. It makes sense that Napoleon, a man who seizes power, takes control of the revolution. Napoleon also had a reputation of being an excellent military chief, which lead to an even greater acceptance to him in France. In 1802, he declared himself the consul for life, and 2 years after that, he held enough power to become the emperor of the French. The French longed for change because the American Revolution had inspired them, and there was a large gap between the rich and the poor.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They both were what shaped their ages with their power. Napoleon created a massive more mobile army than anyone else had in that time. In that time France had went through more revolutionary turmoil than anyone else. Which made the government corrupt and unorganized.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Purchase

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Napoleon wanted to consolidate his resources so that he could focus on conquering England. Believing he lacked the troops and materials to wage an effective war, the French general wished…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louisiana Purchase

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    was that France was running very low on money and Napoleon knew that this piece of…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Napoleon Bonaparte did great things such as; granted constitutions, introduced law codes, abolished feudalism, made an efficient government, made education a top priority, started a new banking system, revolutionized the art of war and rebuilt France he was a horrible leader. Napoleon was a horrible leader because he had a bad ego and executed many people just because they disapproved of his leadership skills. He was exceedingly egocentric by crowning himself king, forsaking his army when they were losing battles, and appointing high positions to his relatives. Napoleon was an idiot for appointing his son the King of Rome when he wasn’t even a year…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays