Preview

How To Evaluate Milgram's Experiment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
483 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How To Evaluate Milgram's Experiment
In 1963, Stanley Milgram from Yale University conducted an experiment focusing about obedience to authority figure verse personal conscience. However, in this research the volunteering subjects thinks it is based on the study of learning and memory. This experiment involves three people, the experimenter, naïve subject, and the victim; the ending result was unpredictable. The experiment had total of forty participant who are men between age twenty to fifty with different backgrounds and occupations. The procedure was to have a person (the subject) to manage electric shock to a victim, however, the victim is associated with the experimenter (Milgram 1963). In this experiment there is a teacher and a learner, to decide who receive which position of the study they will draw out a slip from a hat. Both slip will say ‘teacher’ on it, when being announced the associated victim would claim to be the learner. The teacher will ask questions …show more content…
Before this experiment, fourteen Yale Senior predicted that out of 100 people, only 3 will complete the study (Milgram 1963). The ending result astonished Milgram because he thought that the subjects would stop obeying after their personal conscience articulate. Since people learn from a young age what is right or wrong. This clarified that even though the participant didn’t want to continue shocking the learner but proceed because they obeyed the experimenter’s request. In conclusion, this studies shows that people are more likely to be obedience to higher authority than listening to their personal conscience. Half the subject wanted to stop the experiment but continued on their own free well because they feel like they owe something to the experimenter or think they have to complete this study. Nevertheless, more research will clarify why people are submissive than making decision based on their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Stanley Milgram’s “The Perils of Obedience,” Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that would involve an experimenter, a teacher, and a learner to determine how far obedience would play a role on willing participants. The purpose of Milgram’s experiment is to see how far a willing participant would go based on orders to continue knowing that the orders would result in another person’s pain. The experiment was set up so that two willing participants went into the experiment understanding that they were taking part in a memory and learning exercise. One of the two willing participants played the role as the…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Replicating Milgram (The Open University, 2014), Milgram explains how he set up his obedience experiment. His aim was to get a volunteer, a ‘teacher’ to inflict increasing amounts of pain, through electric shocks, to another volunteer a ‘learner’ and to see when the ‘teacher’ would turn to the researcher, the ‘authority figure’ and ask to stop. Unknown to ‘the teacher’, the ‘learner’ and the ‘authority figure’ were aware of the real purpose of the experiment; the ‘teacher’ was told it was to study the effect of punishment on learning, and genuinely thought that they were inflicting pain on the ‘learner’ sat in another room. It was this deception and the emotional stress it generated to the ‘teacher’ that prompted the ethical issues debate…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every human has a unique and complex thought processing system in which it is nearly impossible to determine how each person will react in a given situation. At an early age, people are taught to be obedient and oftentimes are forced to make a decision between being obedient or following their own morals. Usually, obedience wins because of the emphasis society has placed on it. Most of human’s actions are a result of a previous action in which they felt necessary to do. Both authors, Stanley Milgram of “The Perils of Obedience” and Ian Parker of “Obedience” agree that, humans, as a whole, will not respond the same in every similar situation because their actions are usually a result of obedience or of their current situation, rather than their personality.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stanley Milgram’s experiment was conducted to justify the acts of Nazi killings during the World War II. Milgram’s general findings after the experiments: Ordinary people are likely to follow orders given by an authority figures even to the extent of hurting or killing other people. He claims that people can act inhumanely with limited feelings and compassion under blind obedience to authority. On his experiment, most of the participants continued to inflict the punishment all the way to the highest level when assured that they are not held responsible. Some participants went on and follow the commanded actions even if they seemed in conflict and against their conscience.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past century, the field of Psychology has prospered, giving way to a more in depth knowledge and understanding of people’s social interactions with one another and what drives those connections. 20th century psychologist, Stanley Milgram, executed a series of Obedience to Authority test on random participants. As seen in the YouTube videos online and in class, Milgram’s study found that over 65% of the participants carried out the experiment, despite potentially hurting someone, due to the authority figure urging them to continue.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obedience and Authority Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram wrote an article, "The Perils of Obedience," which documented his unique experiment about obedience and authority. The purpose was to observe to what extent an ordinary citizen would compromise his or her conscience when ordered to inflict increasing pain to another human. The experiment consisted of three people: a teacher and learner chosen at random, and a scientist. Once all three were acquainted, the scientist explained that the goal of the experiment was to research the effects of discipline. Thereafter, the learner was strapped to a chair with an electrode attached to their wrist.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1963, Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted a series of social psychology experiments to study the conditions under which the people are obedient to authorities and personal conscience. The purpose of his experiment was to determine whether or not people were particularly obedient to the higher authority who instructed them to perform various acts even if they violate their own morals and ethics. It was one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology as it has inspired other researchers to explore what makes people question authority and more importantly, what leads them to follow orders. There were several replications of his experiment and the results were identical to those reported by Milgram about how…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This experiment speaks to the 'nature of responsibility' and to see if the subject will stop the experiment…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An advertisement was placed in a newspaper to ask for volunteers, which inspired 296 people to respond to the advertisement. However, Milgram was aiming for a larger sample size, therefore invitation letters were posted out to several thousand people, with approximately 12 % of return rate. Participants ranged between 20 and 50 years old from varying occupations. Misleading the participants, Milgram told them that the aim of the study is to determine ‘the effect of punishment on learning’ (Milgram, 1974). However the true purpose of the study was to identify how far would participants go to comply with the authority (the experimenter) before disobeying the authority…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prior to the experiments, Milgram sought predictions about the outcome from psychiatrists, college sophomores, middle-class adults, graduate students and faculty in behavioral sciences. All thought the teachers would refuse to obey the experimenter. The majority of the teachers would show concern once the learners began showing signs of discomfort. However, 60 percent of them followed the orders until the end, administering shocks to the learner up to 450 volts. (para. 27) The findings were dismissed as having no relevance to “ordinary” people considering the subjects used were students of Yale. Colleagues of Milgram claimed that these students were highly aggressive and competitive when provoked. (para. 27)…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Respondents were being informed that the experiment would analyze how being punished could have an effect on learning aptitude. Three individuals would be involved in the experiment, one person who would be the “experimenter”, one person who would be the “teacher” and one person who would be the “learner.” The experimenter was in charge of the entire experiment, giving orders to the teacher when they were hesitant to perform their duties, and would continuously remind the teacher that they must continue the trial, even when they began to feel uncomfortable with their part in the experiment. The role of experimenter would be filled by someone who was completely aware of the experiment, and would try their best to keep the experiment going for as long as they could. The teacher was meant to listen and obey the rules of the experimenter and deliver unpleasant stimuli to the learner when ordered to by the experimenter. The learner was supposed to memorize word pairings and then answer questions about these word pairings to the best of…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yale University psychologist, Stanley Milgram, conducted an experiment in 1961 focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. He examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II Nuremberg War Criminal trials. Their defense often was based on "obedience" - that they were just following orders from their superiors. Milgram's experiment, which he told his participants was about learning, was to have participants (teacher) question another participant (learner), and when the learner got a question wrong the teacher would shock the learner. For every question wrong, the teacher would increase the amount of volts used in the shock. Of course the experiment was actually about obedience, the learner was an experimenter, and the shock was faked (McLeod). Milgram's was one of the first psychology experiments to use…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram Experiment

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stanely Milgram created an experiment involving Yale students to injure a third party using electric shocks and studied how many students would follow orders and go along with the experiment. The experiment consisted of two people, a leaner and a teacher. The teacher would be placed at a table containing many different buttons and switches that were labeled from slight shock to severe shock. Then the learner, who was an actor, was strapped down to prevent excessive movement. He is instructed that he will be asked questions and if he was to answer wrong he will receive an electric shock that would eventually increase in intensity.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram’s experiment was created to show how well people react when obeying the orders of authority. The subjects who ask the questions were the teachers, and the test subjects who had to answer were the learners. If the learner answers the question incorrectly, the teacher will punish them by giving them a shock that was harmful, but not life-threatening. During the experiment, the intensity of the shock increased, which made the learner yell and scream…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When obeying authority one can often loose thought of morals and beliefs. In the experiments the men obey the authority figure by doing cruel things they would not usually do. These experiments turn mentally stable men into a person willing to inflict harsh punishments on innocent people while following orders. Night by Elie Wiesel, The Milgram Shock Experiment, and the stanford prison experiment shows how obedience to an authority can cause people to stray from their conscience.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays