Preview

How Successful Was Wolsey's Foreign Policy 1515-29?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
635 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Successful Was Wolsey's Foreign Policy 1515-29?
How successful was Wolsey’s foreign policy 1515-29?
On one hand Thomas Wolsey’s foreign policy from 1515-29 was successful because he managed to get most of Europe to agree on perpetual peace which had previously been very difficult. This was what Wolsey’s Foreign policy was all about; acting as a mediator between other countries and gaining respect and prestige so this was a great success. In 1518 Wolsey hosted a great conference in London which representatives of the majority of European powers, including Spain and the Holy Roman Emperor, attended and agreed to peace in Europe. Furthermore with the signing of the Treaty by the Pope London became the centre of Christian Europe and meant Wolsey gained support from the Pope, resulting in future ambitions to become Pope, although these did not materialise.
Wolsey’s foreign policy during this period was also successful because he managed to adapt to the changing situation in Europe thus keeping England in a position of relative strength. For example after Charles V’s victory over Francis I at Pavia in 1525 Charles V turned down Henry 8th’s idea to split France between them. Instead of doing nothing Wolsey formed an alliance with France in August 1525 therefore changing sides and this led to the League of Cognac in May 1526 where there was a diplomatic revolution against Charles V from England, France, the Pope, Venice, Milan and Florence. This proves not only that Wolsey wanted to maintain peace in Europe and keep the balance of power but also that he was able to gain support from European powers and increase England’s standing in Europe.
However Wolsey’s foreign policy was not successful in this period because England was often humiliated by other powers and shown to be a minor player in Europe. A strong example of this was in 1516 when Charles V replaced Ferdinand of Spain and proceeded to make peace with France at Noyon. Wolsey’s attempt to set up a league against France had failed and also meant that England was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, President Woodrow Wilson tried his best to stay neutral in the European conflicts. However, he was not able to do this because of the attacks on many American crafts which lead to the death of many citizens. Woodrow tried to take a peaceful approach to the war by making many attempts to come to an agreement with Germany. Germany refused and their relations deteriorated. This lead to U.S. involvement in World War I. Wilson justified his actions by saying that he was making the world safe for democracy. In the end the war caused a lot of bloodshed, and most impacting a lot of social, political, and economic…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source 4, an extract from Scarisbrick ‘Henry VIII,’ gives the impression that Henry gave all power to Wolsey, whilst he “hunted and jousted.” Cavendish then states how the king had “surrendered the cares of the state into the Cardinal’s hands.” This gives the impression that Wolsey had the powers of the king and was in charge of running the country efficiently. This is supported by source 6, where Henry asks Wolsey to watch some of the key nobility as well as “any others of whom you are superior.” This is clearly Henry giving Wolsey freedom to act as he wishes, thus suggesting power being given to Wolsey. Additional evidence of Wolsey’s power, especially over the nobility, can be seen in his work in the Star Chamber where he often imprisoned nobles. In one instance, Wolsey ordered Sir Paulet Angus [named needs to be verified] to follow him for five years in return for the humiliation suffered by Wolsey earlier on in his career. This presents the Cardinal as a powerful figure i8n the government, who could act freely from the king.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many successes of their (Henry and Wolsey’s) foreign policy. Wolsey was a successful peace broker, and the treaty of London in 1518 was a great example of him ability. This treaty in 1518 was an agreement of peace which seemed to put England in to the centre of diplomatic affairs in Europe (which was what Henry wanted). The treaty bound France, Spain, the Papacy, HRE and England against the Turkish. At the time it seemed like a great success as it seemed to signify the end of fear of England being isolated in Europe, however in the long term it failed despite the short term success.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Henry didn’t always get his way. Early on in his reign he made an agreement with Maximilian of Burgundy to aid him in his campaign against the French and the Flemish so long as…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The English Foreign Policy from 1515 to 1528 can often be described as incoherent; this is because the aims of foreign policy from 1515 to 1529 kept altering due to the change in balance of power in Europe. This meant that for England to keep acting as the centre for European affair the foreign policy would have to keep changing. A result of this was that the foreign policy seemed ineffective due to lack of structure, the high costs, and few territorial acquisitions was the traditional opinion on the foreign policy that it was a failure. However with all of these mentioned factors the foreign policy could also have been seen as very effective. This was due to its ability to adapt to situations that arose in the period 1515 to 1529. If you break down this time period into smaller sections you can look at them individually and see where the foreign policy was effective on a smaller scale. When looking at this way it is easier to get a bigger picture as to how effective the foreign policy actually was.…

    • 3141 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kings and Queens Paper

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1516, Charles V became king of Spain and its colonies in the Americas. Charles V was not always called Charles V when he first was king of Spain he was known as Charles I. he changed his name after his other grandfather died and he became the heir to the sprawling Hapsburg Empire which included the Holy Roman Empire and the Netherlands. Therefore, after all was said and done Charles V had control of almost all of South America, Spain, Germany, and the Netherlands one of the biggest empires ever! Because Charles had a huge empire, he was involved in constant warfare. He fought to suppress Protestantism in the Germanic states, but after years of fighting, he was forced to allow German princes to choose their own religion. Charles also faced the Muslim Ottoman Empire, which caused major defeats for Spain. Charles V gave up his titles and retired on 1556. He split up his lands between two of his brothers.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Firstly I believe that Henry VIII's foreign policy was an overall failure, for various reasons. Henry VIII's foreign policy was to be drastically different to that of his predecessor and father, Henry VII. Where Henry VII's foreign policy was very reserved and almost non existent due to the need to rebuild the stability of his own country and his complete lack of resources and money at the time, Henry VIII's was completely the opposite. As Henry was born into wealth and security he didn't quite have the same morals as his father, and wanted to be the heroic, chivalrous night like Edward V. He wanted England to regain glory, power and status in Europe and with his aggressive foreign policy he was completely and utterly prepared to go to war for this, and that's what he did. However Henry VIII was not powerful enough to go it alone and he needed to pick and ally. He joined with the Holy League, which consisted of Spain, the Holy Roman Empire and the Pope and in June 1512 invaded a France. This seemed like a great idea with Henry now being allied against his enemy France with power like Spain, however this first attempt turned about to be a disaster. Ferdinand of Spain manipulated him and used his his attack on Northern France as a distraction so they could attack Navarre. Henry's men were left dejected, diseased and mutinous forcing retreat. So, due to Henry VIII's naivety his foreign policy is so far unsuccessful. Nevertheless, Henry was mostly unperturbed and determined and invaded Northern France again in June…

    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Source C’s disagreement with the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-30 is also backed up with source A as source A says “Although there were some obvious large scale failures, especially between 1515-25 and 1529” source A also is partly talking about the failure of the amicable grant which resulted in England being sidelined from European affairs.…

    • 768 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Wolsey was Henry VIII chief minister from his rise to power in 1514 after working himself up until his eventual fall from the king’s favour in 1529. During the time period where Wolsey contained his power he made many changes to England’s domestic policies. For this reason I do not accept the view of source V that Wolsey’s domestic policies were completely disappointing.…

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Apush Chapter 5 Outline

    • 6317 Words
    • 26 Pages

    a. King George’s war failed to establish either England or France as the dominate power…

    • 6317 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Austria-Hungary Imperialism

    • 4593 Words
    • 19 Pages

    - He wanted to be the pilot of European affairs, as a strong force of…

    • 4593 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    extremely weak one with Henry VI who seemed to show a clear lack of interest in ruling the country, and…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry the VIII wanted to end his marriage to Catherine of Aragon in 1527 with using an annulment, this was then Wolsey’s job to provide what the king wanted. Due to Wolsey’s constant victories, he was able to sustain power for 15 years, outlasting the King‘s other advisers. Yet his fall was swift and dramatic, which came after his failure of obtaining Henry’s divorce from Catherine of Aragon. In regards to this, it seems clear that this is the reason why Wolsey fell from power, yet there are possible contributing factors that must take into consideration. For instance Wolsey’s failure sometimes was out of his control as Queen Catherine was Charles V’s aunt so he would never accept the annulment in fear of hear being humiliated. Charles also had captured Pope Clement this meant that all decisions would have been controlled and manipulated to Charles’ will, delaying the annulment even more. Another failure that was out of Wolsey’s control was the role of factions within the court, Anne Boleyn and her family…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How important was his opposition at court in causing Wolsey’s fall from power in 1529? (24 marks)…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This rebirth came after being embarrassed and humiliated by his marriages to Cleves and Howard. It is also important to recognise as Richardson does, that the reason the peace after 1545 is so uneasy is because of Henry’s achievements in war. No longer was there a balance in honour, therefore Francis was stuck in a peace he wanted to resolve - hence the continued sour relations that weren’t seen after the Field of the Cloth of Gold, which was otherwise similar in circumstances. The reason Henry VIII acted in such a reserved, and what has been interpreted as fearful way in 1539, was because of extent of the threat - the potential for a Catholic Crusade from a Habsburg-Valois alliance had a significant potential, in the wake of the Papal Bull of Excommunication against Henry VIII. Had the Treaty of Toledo been followed through it would have presented an existential crisis to the throne. However other explanations for his alliance seeking have been uncovered by McEntegart. He argues that, whilst security still remained a top priority, the king also had theological reasons for discussing with the Schmalkaldic League, exemplified by his considerations, at least on aspects of the Augsburg confession, in order to assist in creating uniformity in the Church. Furthermore he reveals the great plays of Cromwell’s faction in this period against the conservatives in order to further his heretical cause. This in turn led to Henry more closely seeking relations with the Schmalkalden as well as withdrawing from mainstream European politics. Security was secondary to honour, partially due to honour producing a security in its own right, at least in the eyes of Henry, but crucially due to the great focus that was still placed on the role of a chivalric and Godly…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays