Preview

How Great Really Was Alexander The Grea

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
618 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Great Really Was Alexander The Grea
The question is, how great was Alexander the great? If I were asked that question I’d say that Alexander was pretty great. Take the spread of cultural diffusion, if it weren’t for Greece’s culture of plays and acting there wouldn’t be any type of movies, shows, and plays. Don’t forget about Alexander’s great inspirational leadership, inspired many people to continue his legacy years later after his death. Finally, Alexander was a great military leader. He did all things possible in order to build a strong army, determined to do absolutely everything possible to conquer his empire.
First off lets take a look at Alexander’s empire. Alexander managed to obtain land like never before. He also won most of the battles all throughout his empire, which can be seen on document a. He managed to cover thousands of miles across the country, never giving up and always doing his best in order to succeed. Taking a bit of Greece’s culture and spreading it place to place as he traveled through the country. As you can see on Alexander’s empire, he managed to own a small piece of land for every country he managed to cover. He never lost a battle, although times of hardship came. Managing many people and soldiers in order to go on and fight each battle.
Secondly, Alexander was a very smart man when it came to tactics. Doing whatever it took to continue his journey he never failed. One very curious and clever tactic was thought of by Alexander himself was the night he pitched camp on the bank of Hydaspes. That night, Alexander realized that he couldn’t cross at the point where Porus was encamped according to document b. Alexander decided to move his troops in all different directions so that Porus would keep puzzled. At night, Alexander would take most of his cavalry to various points among riverbanks where he created a clamour, raised the war cry and produced all sorts of sounds. This led the elephants towards the shooting. His tactic went on for quite a while until finally Porus no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great’s ability to maintain effective organizational systems and structure and seamlessly communicate and execute strategies were the catalysts of his defeat of Darius’ larger army (Nassar, n.d.). To begin with, Alexander rigorously trained and prepared his troops to fight prior to an actual battle, which enabled him to maintain a small, agile, highly disciplined, and efficient army (History.com, 2009). Furthermore, Alexander’s appointment of commanders to each unit enhanced real time communication and facilitated coordinated disbanding of phalanxes to allow Darius’ cavalry units to pass through the phalanx, where they were attacked by Alexander’s infantry units (Wasson, 2014). Therefore, attacking Darius’s left flank, in conjunction…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    All throughout school teachers have taught students that Alexander The Great was indeed great but, is this really true? He did conquer much land and spread greek culture throughout Europe but not many people know what he did to his men in order to do this. One way that he torched his men to get what he wants is in Document D when the man went through all that work to get him his hat back after it falling into the water than killed him. He did this because in order to get the hat back without getting wet he would have to place it on his head. Since he placed in on his head he had to get it cut off because it says “he should not allow the head that had worn the royal head band to be safe” (Document D). He did this to show the rest of his men…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander was great because he conquered a country in the years 333BC, 332BC, 331BC, 331BC, 330BC, 327BC, 324BC and 323BC. This demonstrates that he was great because he used tactics that would defeat enemies. An example of a tactic he used is phalanx. Phalanx means “a body of Macedonian infantry drawn up in close order with shields touching and long spears overlapping”. This was good because he could easily besiege cities which helped him take over the Mediterranean. My own research shows that Alexander the Great took power over the countries Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Palestine, Egypt, northern Afghanistan and Iraq. This shows how Alexander the Great was so prodigious.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great. The ruler of Greece from 356-323 B.C.E. He walked right into military and political aspects. Alexander was an awesome young man and wanted the world to know that he would become just as great of a ruler as his father. It was a must that once he gained the power that all should know he was competent in his work. Alexander will forever be recognized for being a dynamic ruler to the people of Greece. For that alone he leaves behind a legacy that will never fade from history.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander was a great leader even though some people commonly think that he was a sword wielding tyrant. Alexander was a great leader because he respected the beliefs of other people, had a great respect for knowledge, and he was a superior strategist in battle. He was so great that he was almost able to conquer the whole known world.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With all these reasons how could one not consider Alexander to be great? If he is not to be considered great despite all of his achievements then no one that has ever walked on this planet should ever receive the status of great because no leader can keep a balance of being merciful, tolerant, tactical and wise like the Macedonian king, Alexander the Great,…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 15 years of fighting, Alexander the Great never lost a battle. Although he did some evil things because his personality and arrogance got the best of him, he made some good decisions for the sake of his empire. Alexander the Great was truly a great leader. He ruled his empire under some pretty good tactics and a great government. So, was he truly a great ruler?…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great was, in many ways, an amazing ruler. He was not afraid to take a chance on someone or something that everyone else had given up on, and he was prepared to risk his safety to help his men. Alexander also proved to his men that he was strong and that he was prepared to die for his cause.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page

    Many people think that Alexander the Great was truly great because of all his accomplishments, but not all of the things he did were great. He did lots of cruel things to people and animals just because he wanted to gain more power. Alexander has killed approximately 100,000 people only in four major battles (Alexander’s Legacy Doc E). Alexander was a prince who was born in macedonia of 356 BC. Alexander was very arrogant. He was taught by a philosopher Aristotle. He taught him subjects like, politics, sports, and warfare. Philip, Alexander’s father built the macedonian army into a deadly fighting machine, this sparked alexander’s interest and was eager to to lead the army. And Alexander got his chance to lead at the age of 20, because Philip…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Well, our opinion is that Alexander the Great is great. He was attacked by the Persian and he successfully defeated them. Alexander moved south along the eastern Mediterranean. Many cities surrender the Alexander the Great. Some of the men that was in the other armies that they were in, transferred to Alexander’s army. In 332 B.C.E Alexander entered the world of egypt, a country that had experienced on and off periods of Persian rule for two centuries. With Mediterranean and Egypt secured, the Persians were deprived of naval bases and Alexander was free to move inland to conquer the eastern half of the Persian Empire. Alexander had sources of 1 million troops to take over states and cities. Darius III on the other hand brought soldiers all over and even beyond his empire. Persian was on a rampage and Alexander continued to battle against them until they…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great like most heroes in history have traits that makes it possible for him to be able to do great things. Alexander of Macedonia was a 20 year old leader who got his empire from passed down from family, Macedonia and city-states in Greece. Alexander decided to attempt to conquer the entire Persian Empire, from Egypt to India, In this process he did things historians question made him great or not. Alexander the Great was great because of his intelligence, empathy for others and leadership.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In conclusion, Alexander deserves the title of “The Great”. He deserves it because of his education, military accomplishments, and his courage. He was tutored by one of the most influential philosophers, Aristotle. He created the largest empire at the time and was generous with his spoils. Alexander was courageous in battle, and fought alongside his men. Yes, he did have some faults, but the positives outweigh the negatives. Alexander does deserve his title, and to say that he does not is unfair to him and what…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great is recognized as one of the greatest commanders that world has ever seen, if not the greatest. Alexander first led troops as a mere teenager and became king afterwards due to the assassination of his father. He decided to expand the Greek Empire, which his dad, King Philip, started but couldn't finish. At just the age of twenty years old, he set…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian empire at its peak has long been seen as one of the largest wholes during the classical era, and few have rivaled its size. The land that Alexander the Great was able to conquer, however, was one of the few that served as an appropriate challenge. Around the time of 338 B.C.E through 323 B.C.E., Alexander's collected mass was a whole. Of a Greek origin, Alexander was taught by Aristotle, the great philosopher, and it can be inferred that he used the strategic methods learned, among other things, to assist him during his expansion. It was short lived, however, when he died of an unknown cause at an early age of thirty-three. Even though his empire crumbled, his legacy lived on. Multiple cities, strongly influenced by Alexander, erected,…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Alexander the Great, or Alexander III of Macedon, was the son Phillip II, the king of Macedon, who lived in 323-356 B.C., and succeeded the throne and army after the assassination of his father. Alexander was best known for his creation of the Macedonian empire, and for his tactics on expansion, and his campaign that lasted 10 years. He is contributed with leading his armies in the infamous Phalanx formation, and for the creation of the Delian league. Although his is an iconic figure in Greek history, the question remains, should Alexander be considered great? Was he really great? Maybe not, but Alexander did possess some qualities that were indeed great.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays