Preview

How Far Did Curkannon Made A Colossal Failure

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1183 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Far Did Curkannon Made A Colossal Failure
How far would you agree with the view that Curzon made a ‘colossal failure’ of his job as Viceroy.

It was Curzon’s life ambition to become Viceroy of India, therefore he worked extensively as a young man to ensure that he was prepared for the job should the situation arise that he was given the job of Viceroy. As a boy he studied at Eton and Oxford which would show not only that he gained the level of education expected of someone that would later become Viceroy but also that he represented the traditional view of India being ‘the jewel in the British Empires crown.’ Source D shows that even among the likes of children that studied at Eton and Oxford he was considered to be very arrogant. As a young man Curzon travelled extensively in the
…show more content…
For these reasons Curzon put forward the idea the Bengal should be divided into two sections of east and west. Curzon faced strong opposition from his advisors both in Britain and India but he chose to ignore all of them and go ahead with his plan. Hindus were strongly against the partition because they would lose control in the eastern part of Bengal, but Muslims were pleased that they would gain some power. The divide resulted in civil unrest ranging from peaceful protests to riots and the murder of British officials. There was a boycott of British goods and thousands signed a petition, which demanded that the two sections of Bengal be reunited. Curzon ignored all of these indicators which should have told him that he had made the wrong decision which led to further confrontation between the British and Indians. Source H highlights the view of the Indian citizens and how it was not in the best interest of the Indian nation to have a part of the country to be divided. The source also explains that Curzon’s actions ‘Illustrated the worst features of the present system of bureaucratic rule.’ Curzon’s ignorance and blatant rejection of his advisors and the Indian citizens view. He did not see the opinions the Indian people; his aim was to make India more efficient in an administrative sense, and for that to happen he sacrificed the views of the people that lived in the country he was meant to be preserving and improving. Which meant he was adversely affecting the opinion that people in India had for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Imagine living in India when the British took full control, and then being forced to change your day to day life. The british had an economic interest in India which started during the 1600’s. During the Industrial Revolution, India was considered a prized possession by the British because they supplied raw materials to the factories for production. Eventually, the British took full control of India, and made some major changes that significantly impacted India. Although the British had a negative economic impact on India, they had a positive impact on both the political and social aspects of India. The British were able to set a foundation for India, and create a justice system while containing violence, even though they had to take away some Indian rights to do so.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Therefore Britain did not care about Indians and their well-being, and instead only cared for their own profit and gain. In addition, Britain was able to control the Indian economy due to mercantilism. Mercantilism is the establishment of foreign trading monopolies. This can be seen in India where the British took raw materials from India, produced them in their own industries in Britain, and sold the finished products back to India (Textbook, pg. 358). Britain was able to control the economy because the imported goods were much cheaper than the ones made in local Indian industries.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One view presented by the sources is that Indians did not like the British rule. The theme of hostility is presented in Source 11, where Gandhi writes in 1920 that the British are “evilly manned”, using strong words such as “dishonest” and “unscrupulous”, suggesting strong feelings of hostility towards British rule, as Gandhi feels as though the British are almost cheating the Indian people “with no regard to the wishes of the Indian people”, meaning the British are doing what they want without consulting the people they are ruling over. This source shows that the hostility felt by Indians was in fact widespread because it is written by Gandhi, a man who represented and was supported by a variety of people from all classes. This theme of hostility towards British is corroborated in Source 10 where the British are described as “irresponsible” and, like in Source 11, the Indians feel their “rights of human beings are being denied”, showing that the Indians again felt that the British were doing as they pleased without Indian voices being heard. However, as the source is written by Motilal Nehru, leader of the INC, it is difficult to say from this source that hostility was in fact widespread – Nehru only represents the INC which has the high caste community as a significant majority, and as it is written in 1919, we cannot be sure if the hostility was long-lasting as it is the same year as the massacre itself.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British imperialism had a negative impact on the politics of India because the justice system was biased toward Indians and that the government had more white…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fact that Charles had made it very difficult for any advice which went against his own view…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With many politicians believing the British were civilising the peoples of periphery, the British probably believed the peoples of the American colonies needed to be taught to respect the metropole, which believed it had a parent role. In contrast, in the Indian case acts of resistance had yield some success. It could, however, be argued that the war a make factor in this success. As Fieldhouse points out: Stafford Cripps promised India dominion status ‘to rally Indian opinion in the crisis caused by Japan’s entry into the war’ (Secondary Source 19.2, 2015, p.10). As well as the civil disobedience, which was part of the ‘Quit India’ campaign, the British were also concerned about the Japanese-back ‘Indian National Army’ who had have some military success. In this context, then, the British high likely perceived those whom taken in the civil disobedience as moderates. As Indian support was needed to fight Japan, the British probably felt placating moderates was a small price to pay considering the circumstances. Therefore, the circumstances of war played in a major factor in Indian progress towards…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people believe that in the 1940’s most of India’s problems involving independence was to do with divisions within India rather than British imperialism. In this essay I will be looking at both points of view and finally giving my opinion. I will be using three sources also to help me show both sides of the story. I will also be using my further knowledge to add a wider range of knowledge.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The outrageous division of Bengal by Viceroy Lord Curzon was incited such anti-British sentiment. The All-India Muslim League was formed as an advocate of the Muslim minority, and the political landscape of South Asia was forever changed, with Muslims and Hindus mixed up and pitted against each other. They sought, then, to be divided into more than one nation from the colony of India. The population resettlement question following the new independence of India became a huge dispute that cost thousands of lives and remains not totally solved. The colony ultimately became India and Pakistan, but there are still disputes over certain regions and small territories, some based on the population of each community and some of the traditional leadership.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    ‘A failure of Charles II’s opponents rather than his own actions defeated the Exclusion movement’. How far do you accept this judgement of the years 1678-85?…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The effect of people around King Charles, was not positive. He was not surrounded with intelligent commanders as the Parliament. Instead King Charles suffered from having some dimwitted generals, like Lord Byron and Prince Rupert…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The British rule was clearly not accepted in India because of the noticeable divide in India. Source 1 is a letter from Queen Victoria complaining about the viceroy and questions whether he is a successful viceroy. The viceroy, Curzon, never showed any interest in India but he still decides to be the viceroy of India. The source says that he ‘tramples’ on the Indian people. India wouldn’t be happy about the fact that he is English but he is also a very poor viceroy. This shows that he has no support of the Indian people which he desperately needs for him to be successful. Source 1 is also written by the Queen which shows that Curzon obviously isn’t doing a good job as viceroy if the Queen is getting involved. It was also a private letter so the source is likely going to be a strong and valuable source because at the time it wasn’t published. Source 2 is a letter to a Kesari newspaper talking about India’s freedom. In terms of power, India had no freedom under the British rule. India was dominated by Britain and didn’t have any influence in India. The source has evidence that India believed that their ‘condition wouldn’t be any better by the exchange of the British rule’. Separatism is very much alive in India and there is a lack of trust between the two nations. Just like in source 3,…

    • 809 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, Charles I’s personal life choices made his reign go down from the very beginning! In the same year in which he became the monarch, he married Henrietta Maria of France, a Catholic princess. Of course, the Parliament was all against his marriage, as England was a Protestant country and marrying a Catholic princess would increase the chances of a religion change. In addition to this, Parliament distrusted the Duke (Charles’ main advisor), Buckingham. A popular rhyme in source 1, page 42 shows how much the people of England hated Buckingham: ‘…Who rules the King? The Duke. Who rules the Duke? The Devil’. To be described as ‘The Devil’ by the public must have meant that he had a really bad influence on Charles and England. What was bad about Charles’ choice of advisors was that he picked his friends to help him rule the country, meaning that they all earned titles and riches, instead of choosing experienced leaders who would have helped to make his reign successful.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His successor, Charles the first, did much worse. He had many conflict with the parliament. Notable when he…

    • 733 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles made and The troubles he caused. In Power, I will discuss how Charles and…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    lord curzon fact file

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After the 1895 General Election, the Conservative Party regained power and Curzon was rewarded with the post of undersecretary for foreign affairs. Three years later the Marquis of Salisbury granted him the title, Baron Curzon of Kedleston, and appointed him Viceroy of India. Curzon introduced a series of reforms that upset his civil servants. He also clashed with Lord Kitchener, who became commander-in-chief of the Indian Army, in 1902. Arthur Balfour, the new leader of the Conservative Party, began to have doubts about Curzon and in 1905 he was forced out of office.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays