Preview

How Do Globalization Have Encouraged Humans To Disregard The Moral Rights Of Animals

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
911 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Do Globalization Have Encouraged Humans To Disregard The Moral Rights Of Animals
My Thesis Statement: This essay argues that humans have used globalization as a tool to reach their ends and in the process animals are a very easier means at their disposal to realise their ends, thus leaving animals bereft of all their life rights and entitlements.
How globalization have encouraged humans to disregard the moral rights of animals?
Animals are used in food as much as they are used in sports in the Middle East, in that when camels are used for racing using robot jockeys who whips camels to win. Qatar has seen a lot of camel racing, which they believe as their tradition, where the best camels who can run faster are fed well to bring money to their owners. Poor camels are not encouraged for sports but are converted to food as
…show more content…
Biodiversity includes multiple flora fauna and animal species. Increasing pollution due to activities encouraged by globalization are severely affecting many species, even those which are on the verge of extinction. Globalization activities are polluting and degrading the quality of air, soil, and water that are inherently essential for the survival of many species in diverse biosphere of earth. The effects are clear when Ehrenfeld quotes “Occasionally, pressures of globalisation can be shown to be causally related to the loss of a particular kind of domestic livestock, as in the case of the near demise of Haiti's Creole pigs” (Ehrenfeld). These impacts are escalating the damage that is almost irreversible, leading to loss of resources to humans for their perpetual survival. Increase in factories, production plants, using hazardous materials in production, throwing off waste materials that harm the environment are some of the activities that affect the biodiversity in turn affecting the possibility of human species to keep extracting resources at free will and without restrictions. Air pollution, waste disposal, water and soil pollution and deterioration are by-products of activities that are purely based on the implementation of globalization. Is this not self-sabotage, where capitalists ignore the dire consequences and irreversible impacts of their activities on biodiversity and the global ecological environment? Are they not liable for the direct and indirect damages being persistently caused to the environment? Can globalization continue without incorporating the social, environmental, and biological costs of its own growth? Globalization has been ignoring large scale impacts on biodiversity due entirely to the inexpressiveness of various species and the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    We are using animals in such a horrific way that causes negative changes to the environment.We should always think what this world be if we didn’t have the things we have. We would be miserable and everything would be a competition. There’s lots of people out there working to try to make a difference in this world, but also need people to get involved. It fitted into our course goals and objective because it made me realize how much our world is so corrupt. The only thing we could do is change our ways of thinking, so we can actually live in a peaceful and stable society. Not to think, that we could lose everything in an…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin 's article, “A Change of Heart About Animals” argues that animals are more like humans than we imagine and as a result should be treated with the care that they deserve. Rifkin develops and supports his argument using facts about the animals and these facts end up touching hearts. In order for Rifkin to get his point across he uses a smart technique by using pathos and plays with the emotions of his audience. Rifkin loves animals and his passion and love evokes emotions that the audience can feel. Animals can feel and have emotions similar to ours. in agreement with Rifkin, I argue that it is wrong and inhumane to kill or abuse animals because they feel, they deserve to have space and should be valued as much as humans are It is wrong no animal should be killed due to abuse or testing, it is wrong and inhumane.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The largest and most devastating impact on animals that results from human globalization…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Christoff, P. & Eckersley, R. (2013) Globalization and the Environment. Published by Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group.…

    • 924 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining the rights of non-human animals and deciding how to treat them may not be a choice available to our human society. As an advocate for the rights of animals, Tom Reganʻs three main goals are to abandon the use of animals in any scientific research, discontinue all commercial animal agriculture, and to completely terminate both commercial and sport animal hunting. To support these intentions, Regan argues that every human and non-human animal possesses inherent value, which makes them all more than a physical object or vessel. He then states that possessing inherent value allows every human and non-human to have rights of their own. To further his argument, Regan claims that the any human and non-human retaining rights requires equal treatment and respect from others. To conclude his argument, Regan states that due to these reasons, non-human animals cannot be treated as resources and must be treated by humans as equals. In this paper, I object to Reganʻs third premise, which states that non-human and human animals must be treated as equals and with respect, because our communication barrier with non-human animals restricts us from determining their notion of equal treatment or respect, and that attempting to do so could…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justin Le Ms. Jackson ERWC English 28 October 2014 Animal Bill of Rights Despite our genetic makeup and ability, each living organism still obtains the ability to partake in the vast contribution towards this world. We as humans should be proactive in our role of establishing and maintaining a fine balance of life. A prominent responsibility we possess is to regard all living beings as equals.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The general public as well as animals are put at a severe disadvantage as a result of the rules created by the politically elite. Those who are vulnerable in society: animals deemed useful and people who are economically disadvantaged, experience the most severe injustice, in part due to inadequate representation. There is no perceptible correlation between legislature, and mercy. The social justice movement is as strong as ever, and the discrepancy between laws passed and the need for basic human and animal rights has become more ubiquitous in modern culture. Bryan Stevenson’s Just Mercy, Una Chadhuri and Holly Hughes’s Animal Acts, and multiple articles that identify key issues pertaining to animal and human rights. As illustrated through…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The validity of the term, animal welfarism is only true if these non-human individuals are in fact intrinsically valuable. This means that animals can attain value of their own, distinct from financial value that is endorsed by human individuals in which humans have a degree of duty to them, such as treating them humanely. Emerging from this is the question of whether or not humans are willing to separate the meaning of animals having their own value from financial value humans impose on them. The term intrinsic value is supposed to improve an animals living condition, but it has no effect or does the exact opposite; the term is merely used as a “mask-effect” supposedly making us think that they are living in a good environment, when it does not in fact benefit the…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tom Regan Animal Rights

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Animals contain traits that humans acquire into their everyday lives, yet humans find different approaches to make these animals suffer on a day to day basis. Tom Regan, author of Animal Rights, Human Wrongs, describes various situations in which humans hunt animals for pleasure while Stephen Rose, author of Proud to be a Speciesist, illustrates why a speciesist like himself would use animals for research. Tom Regan’s describes his main point as to why humans would want to slaughter such precious animals to have them for resources. On the opposing side of the argument, Stephen Rose’s argument states that animal cruelty cannot be considered wrong because “Many human diseases and disorders are found in other mammals…” (Rose 553). Although Regan…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is a war going on today in our society and it is unknown by most. It is a war on our own soil yet it involves no military or soldiers. It is a war on our rights, and belief’s, our very existence as we know it. It is a war of minds and attitudes. It is a war that has been going on for almost 20 years. This war attacks our very right to make choices for ourselves about our lives, habits and actions. It is a war against the very foundation of our society, our right to pursue happiness. This is a history of the Animal Rights War, the goal to eliminate the use of, interaction with, keeping of, and ownership of animals. The war is about stopping the use of any products gained from the keeping or use of animals, it is about stopping what the animal rights movements sees as exploiting animals for human use. Which includes all medical testing, all zoo’s and entertainment facilities, hunting, fishing and all ranching/farming which uses animals to produce a product, from the most obvious eggs, cheese, milk, wool, and fur, to the more obscure like honey and silk. It is a war to entitle animals to human rights.…

    • 3516 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this essay, I’d like to argue against the general movement concerning animal rights. This movement aims to give animals more rights than is necessary. One of the main people who advocate this movement is Peter Singer. Singer uses many logical arguments that are reasoned and well thought out but are flawed and it will be very useful to show how the animal liberation movement is misguided and unrealistic.…

    • 2564 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals contribute in many ways to our world. We seem to take for granted the benefits animals can have on us. The benefits animals have on our earth shouldn’t be taken for granted. Without animals, our earth would not receive the essential nutrients it needs to flourish. Establishing animal rights will give animals the love and respect that they’ve always deserved. Animal are not pieces of meat, they are a vital resource to the nutriment of our earth. We have been given the power to protect animals and give them rights of their own. We should not ignore the needs of animals. Animals have benefited us in ways no human can. It is our moral duty as humans to take a stand for animals and give them the rights they deserve. At this very moment animals are being abused and carelessly slaughtered. Now is the time to end the abuse of animals and give them the rights that benefits us…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the essay, “The Case For Animals Rights”, Tom Regan stresses that, “the fundamental wrong is the system that allows us to view animals as our resources, here for us- to be eaten, or surgically manipulated, or exploited for sports or money.” As an animal lover, I would never want to intentionally harm or kill any animal without a justifiable cause. But within reason, animals should not be treated equally as human beings. I believe that it is not inhumane for animals to be eaten, surgically manipulated, or exploited for sports and money as long as it is within basic human ethological boundaries.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Regan, Tom. "Animal Rights, Human Wrongs." Forming a Critical Perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010. 336-40. Print.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his essay The Case for Animal Rights, Tom Regan has set out a broad outline as an introduction for his book, The Case for Animal Rights, with same title. In the beginning, the author makes a special emphasis on that, the goals of the advocation of animal rights not only make people treat animals ‘more humane’, but also deny the view, which is fundamental wrong, that animals are humans’ resources. As a defender of animal rights as well as a philosopher, Regan attempts, through his professional knowledge, which area he has been exploring over ten years, to justify that animals have the rights as equal as human beings. In his own words, “people must change their beliefs before they change their habits”.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays