Preview

How Did The Federal Government Regulate The Economy During The Gilded Age

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
749 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The Federal Government Regulate The Economy During The Gilded Age
What should have been the role of the federal government in regulating the economy during the Gilded Age? During the Gilded Age, the federal government’s involvement in the economy hugely impacted the American citizen’s way of life. Reformers, such as President Rutherford Hayes, focused on corporations and how they abused the people by earning money to the expense of the workers. They also strived for better working conditions and wages to prosper in a class society. While it tried various solutions to help the economy, the government should have focused on establishing labor laws, disproving Social Darwinism, and creating more useful tariffs. The United States government addressed problems with the method of managing economics. Companies used the “spoils system” to influence and reward people for joining a certain political party (Shi and Tindall, 643). This meant that workers not participating in politics lost potential money to others who labored the same amount. To combat this view, Hayes expressed his idea of basing pay on only merit; the more one worked, the more payment he or she received. Another president caused this new system to be established with his assassination. The Pendleton Act made government jobs competitive; furthermore, this …show more content…
Darwinism combines Darwin’s “natural selection” and Herbert Spencer’s “ survival of the fittest” to justify class distinctions (Shi and Tindall, 636). This kept the working poor at the bottom of the social and economic ladder while the rich reaped the benefits of the poor’s work. The federal government could have conducted experiments and given examples of persons, like Andrew Carnegie, who had gained power. After becoming a millionaire, Carnegie used his wealth to build hospitals, libraries, and universities (Doc B). Had the government responded this way, then American social classes would be less distinct, and the economy would have been

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Then when the economy went through recessions and depressions, the monopolies and Rockefeller, both still made money. Rockefeller’s fortune was estimated to be over $2 billion when he died. The government should have stepped in when workers were striking and the public was disgusted. Instead the government had a Laissez Faire. Laissez Faire means the government did not want to regulate the economy thoroughly or take any part of the leading businesses, such as the Standard Oil Company. These corporations did everything they could to maximize their profits. That means they tried to do everything as cheaply as possible. They kept wages low, and tried making workers bring their own tools, just to cut costs down. At the same time, all this economic growth did make the country stronger. This oil company set up the country for its future (today’s present). Was it the right way? Not exactly, but because the people in power only cared about money. Until they became more educated and laws were set. Like the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was put into place to prohibit trusts. President Benjamin Harrison signed it as a law. Then Roosevelt set up the Department of Commerce and Labor, also the Bureau of…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    11. New Deal – Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s plan to reform capitalism through forceful government intervention in the…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not only did it help with competitors, but also it limited production so that the prices of products would increase. Both of these acts “were designed to address unemployment by regulating the number of hours worked per week and banning child labor” Then came along the Public Works Administration that helped improve cities. FDR believed that if you invest money on improving where people lived, it would help the economy as well. FDR brought attention to bring new policies on financial sector, this includes banks or companies that deal with insurance. Financial Sector are certain stocks that contain firms that brought assistance to many consumers.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the period after the Civil War, named the "Gilded Age" by author Mark Twain, big business blossomed, and a strong desire for free trade and the concept of self-interest flourished. Adam Smith, in his book An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, introduced the policies of free enterprise and laissez-faire, or minimal government intervention in the economy. While the government often upheld this policy during the period of 1865 to 1900, it also violated it at times.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Focusing initially on Economic policy, the author describes how Roosevelt saw “Lack of opportunity as a breeding ground for crime and radicalism”. The article states how teddy solved the problems of excessive power of the corporate wealth and the increasing dangers of working-class radicalism through progressive reform. Since one percent of American companies manufacture almost 40 percent of its products teddy sought to dissolve corporate trusts. Roosevelt fought hard for the working populous in the United States. The article elaborates on this and talks about how Theodore Roosevelt dealt with a strike between coal miners and their employers. He ended up resolving the conflict with a compromise that would end up being called the square deal. Roosevelt found solutions to the Nation’s Problems. He understood how the unregulated the nation’s economy was in grave need of reform. The author mentions how Teddy implemented the Hepburn Act, to regulate commerce, and the interstate commerce commission. Just as Teddy looked into the future of our nation economically he also did so domestically. The article elaborate on how in order to increase the quality of living in the United States Roosevelt Passed the Pure food and drug act of 1906 and how he created the national Forrest and national parks system. From these many examples the author makes…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Governmental Interference in American Industrial Developments Between the years of 1865 and 1900, the federal government in America acted as a primary source for guidance during the growth in industrial development and market capitalism. It was a time of booming industries and soaring profits for both the people and the government. The government desperately wanted to push forward and help the growth of the newfound industry boom in America, but they also recognized that they needed to implement regulations and standards in order to avoid things like horizontal and vertical integration. The government had an extremely delicate goal to equalize both the promotion and the regulations put fourth on the industrial developments and market capitalism in America.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the government would not intervene with most of the economics of this time then that meant that the big businesses had the power to do anything they wanted no matter who it hurt, which was mostly the lower working classes. In Samuel Gompers Forum, "Letter on Labor in industrial Society", he tried to explain how the industries did not care for the lower classes by stating that, "Year by year man's liberties are trampled under foot at the bidding of corporations and trusts, rights are invaded and law perverted." Samuel went on to say, "You [a federal judge] may not know that the labor movement as represented by the trades unions, stands for right, for justice, for liberty," which meant that as the lower classes tried to fight back against the big businesses the government pushed them down to make sure the upper classes had no problems. Knowing all of this, it raises the question on how much of a laissez - faire government was America at that time?…

    • 698 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the end of the nineteenth century the United States seemed to be racing forward in many areas, such as technological advancement, more efficient manufacturing, modernizing transportation, and of course, making money. America was, on the surface, improving greatly; underneath however, there were many problems including corrupt businesses and a growing lower class stricken by poverty. In 1900 to 1920 the Progressive Reform Movement swept the nation; progressive reformers rallied for equal treatment and better working conditions; the federal government adopted regulations that attempted to satisfy the wishes of the reformer; both groups had successes and limitations that ultimately led to an overall beneficial effect on the nation.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rutherford B. Hayes

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rutherford B. Hayes was famous for approaching reforms in the civil service by giving federal jobs to people openhandedly based on their amount of value. Their merit was determined through an assessment that each person much take. This modification was a complete turn-around from the previous system of engagement, where sponsorship and effectiveness as political organizers were the foundation for receiving a position as a government employee. This caused rage and disagreement with politicians including the Republican Party, which was not…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, there has been various changes within our economy policy. The transition from the Gilded Age to the Progressive Era has shown how much our government’s influence in economics has changed throughout those years. In the Gilded Age, there was a widespread belief in monopolies and taking companies out of business. Although, in the Progressive Era, the government believed in encouraging competition in businesses and attacking trusts in order to do so. On the contrary, these eras also have some of the same economic policies due to it not being changed drastically. In all, these changes have helped build our economic policy we use today.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Are government regulations really needed in the late 1800's to stabilize industrialization or is "control by the government...contrary to our institution..?" To better describe the long time feud between ideas, we will be using two documents titled "Testimony before the U.S. Senate, 1883" and "The Political Economy of Seventy-three Million Dollars, 1882," to compare and contrast the two different view points of industrialization. The first document is about Jay Gould, as a very rich "self-made man" speaking to the U.S. Senate about the problem between the two ever growing social classes; the social classes being between the workforce and the employers. Gould is faced with explaining the problem of the classes and has to respond to its solution. Gould's response differs tremendously from the response of Henry Lloyd's. In the second document, Lloyd tries to summarize Gould's life in one short document. Lloyd takes a very negative approach to describing Gould and his theories because they go against his religious beliefs/duties. Because both Gould's and Lloyd's upbringings were very complementary to the others, their stances on the historical problem of industrialization is able to be compared and contrasted very easily to best break down both of their solutions to the problem.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1937, the Supreme Court used the federal power to regulate interstate commerce to approve many economy-regulation programs, such as minimum-wage, labor-management, and unemployment legislation. The National Industrial Recovery Act attempted to stimulate production and employment, improve working conditions, and lower prices -- economic reforms that were only able to be implemented because of the crisis of the Great Depression. The National Recovery Administration was created to achieve total government control over the economy, quite different from the Founders' emphasis on self and minimalist government. Finally, with World War II, Roosevelt was forced to effect deficit spending to stimulate the economy. This exercise of Keynesian economics set the stage for the next half-century, where the voluntarist conception of freedom prevailed and cultivation of virtue was no longer a government…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1889, Andrew Carnegie wrote one of the greatest documents in history. The Gospel of Wealth describes the new upper class and the phenomenon of wealth inequality. Andrew Carnegie believed capitalism benefited people better than any other economic system and argued that the accumulation of wealth should benefit society not the government. Andrew Carnegie argues that the capitalism system produces fortunes that a single person cannot spend in his or her lifetime and believed that people have the intelligence to know what to do with their money. The Gospel of Wealth claims a difference between deserving and non-deserving poor. People deserve help if they try and failed, but do not deserve help if their situation is from their own bad decisions. The government takes money from the rich in the form of taxes and Carnegie believed the government encouraged the undeserving and discourages the deserving from continuing their efforts. People will not put forth an effort if you just give them money and this is why he suggested help in the way of museums, concert halls, libraries, and universities.…

    • 302 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ask an average U.S. citizen about their stance on government in the economy, and most will agree that government must play some role. The question is, where is the line drawn and at what cost? This cannot be answered without a comprehensive analysis of the political economy and history of economics in the United States. Since such a thorough analysis can not be done within this paper, the goal is not to answer the question, but to provide insight and understanding in the field of economics within our political system. Government has always played a role in the economy (regulating commerce since the very beginning) but one cannot deny that it has played a more crucial role for the past century. Teddy Roosevelt understood that in order to appease the class antagonisms and stabilize the rapidly growing economy, slow reforms needed to be made— such as trust busting and increased regulation of business. During the depression, Franklin Roosevelt’s administration intervened in such a way that provided relief from the economic woes of the times to millions of Americans. In the 1970’s, the gold standard was replaced by the central banking system, which would place more economic control in the government’s hands. Countless other examples can prove to anyone the magnitude of the intervention the economy. To gain a better and broader view of this issue, the difference between ‘intervention’ and ‘involvement’ must be understood. Intervention is a short term solution to long term problems created by the intrinsic contradictions and barriers within the capitalist economy— called the business cycle. Involvement includes long term goals achieved through the implementation of regulations and economic policies that seek to solve many problems of the economy. In the current political sphere, government is the only marginally democratic way to ensure fairness and justice within the economy.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Great Depression DBQ

    • 839 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The America in the 1930s was drastically different from the luxurious 1920s. The stock market had crashed to an all time low, unemployment was the highest the country had ever seen, and all American citizens were affected by it in some way or another. Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal was effective in addressing the issues of The Great Depression in the sense that it provided immediate relief to US citizens by lowering unemployment, increasing trust in the banks, getting Americans out of debt, and preventing future economic crisis from taking place through reform. Despite these efforts The New Deal failed to end the depression. In order for America to get out of this economic disaster, the Federal Government rightly overstepped it’s constitutional bound to adopt the role of a “care taker” and establish a basic minimum of living for the American people.…

    • 839 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays