Preview

How Did The British Gain Power In The Regency Era

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
706 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The British Gain Power In The Regency Era
THE BRITISH MILITARY: HOW IT MAINTAINED POWER IN THE REGENCY ERA.

The British Army, despite being made up mostly of volunteers, was one of the most powerful armies during the Regency Era. Such power is not easy to hold onto, but Britain managed it well through her extensive organization of the army and the functions applied to them, as well as the situation that Britain was being thrown into during this time. A major contributor to Britain maintaining its military dominance was the way that the British organized their army. In the army, “there was a definite hierarchy amongst the various British land forces. At the top were the General and Staff Officers, Household Regiments of Cavalry and Infantry followed by those of the line.” (Boyle). This hierarchical structure allowed for easier management of what was the largest army at the time—a truly global force—based on the merit and credit of individuals and their
…show more content…
For a good portion of the period, “the British Army of 1815 had been honed by years of active confrontation and battle, most recently with France, in the Revolutionary and Napoleonic wars” (Knowles). Britain, in this bogging war with France, can help to explain why Britain saw the extensive organization of her army for reasons other than colony control. During this war, Britain’s manpower—the number of people, in this case, able to fight in the army—drastically changed. Before France attacked, “the [British] army was relatively small.just 45,000 men, two thirds of whom were stationed abroad. They had recruiting issues, and the rank and file were notoriously those who had few other choices.” (Knight). Needless to say, the attack from France served as a wake-up call to the British, as “by 1803, 380,000 men had volunteered [to join the British army]” (Knight), which increased their numbers exponentially to be able to take on their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    During September 1803, Major General Wellesley demonstrated great leadership action by leading his men, a combined force of about 24,000 fully equipped British and Hyderabad soldiers into an overwhelmingly combat engagement against 200,000 Maratha forces (Harvey 2008). Wellesley was cited by one of his Brigadier Generals with “being in the thick of the action the whole time, and had a horse killed under him” (Harvey 2008, p. 195). During this battle Wellesley demonstrated his ability to take advantage of the enemy by controlling the timing of engagement and by devising a well-orchestrated attack, exploiting…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Technological advancements could play a role in this area to explain the change in the trajectory, but the author’s rejection of technological answers does not allow him to do this. Also, Lynn concentrates on institutional factors (recruitment, social composition, and motivation, command administration) to describe his model for evolution yet at various occasions he emphasizes political-economic, military competitiveness, and minimally technological advancements as his explanatory factors for change. Lynn does not clearly give explanation to what brought on the change in different army styles. In one army style military unreliability, increased political centralization, and increased economic monetarization are emphasized and in other centuries technological improvements or political costs are seen as the most influential. In this way Lynn’s explanatory factors are not internally consistent from century to century. For example, if technology had an impact in one time period than Lynn does not give valid reasoning for why it was not considered important in another…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Their defense force were well armed, well-organized, fine salaried, and well fed. The British Navy conquered the oceans. Funds were far more simply elevated by the Continental Congress than by the Empire. Whereas, the Americans had marvelous trouble elevating sufficient funds to buy simple goods for their troops, including shoes and blankets. They didn't have as many men, in fact they had fewer men.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Column of British Soldiers marched out on the morning of April 19, 1775 toward the town of Lexington, Massachusetts. A small band of seventy-seven colonial militiamen stood their way. The shot heard around the world occurred in this time period as the outnumbered Americans retreated, thus starting the American War of Independence. Six years later, on October 19, 1781, Lord Charles Cornwallis surrendered his army at Yorktown, Virginia to the joint forces of General George Washington and French General Rochambeau. This paper intends to analyze how the Americans and French with their culture, language and tactical doctrine barriers to overcome manage to move land and naval forces over their opponent to gain the tactical advantage over the British at Yorktown.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though the New Model Army was initially created to defeat an oppressive king, towards the end it became the military itself that became the problem it was trying to resolve. But, the Parliamentarians were successful in creating a modern professional army based off professionalism, separating politics and the military, and incredible leadership. Unfortunately, the New Model Army ultimately became more than just an improved replacement to the militia system. The New Model Army took the role of government by using its loyal soldiers to overwhelm resisters, taking politics into its own hands when they believed that parliament was inept, and by having Cromwell to finalize the army’s foothold in…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early years British was regarded as the superpower with a capable military and naval forces. The British army was the largest in the world with well equipped and trained soldiers who were well disciplined, well fed and well paid hence they fought their wars with passion. Another advantage on the British was the availability of funds that would be used in paying for the war. It was much easy to collect funds from an empire…

    • 2135 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Towards the end of the eighteenth century the nature of warfare would dramatically change on both upon the battlefield but more importantly how it affected society. Continental Europe was engulfed in war from 1792 following the establishment of the French Republic and continued with the rise of Napoleon until his eventual defeat in 1815. Between 1792 and 1809 the French army seemed to grow from strength to strength turning from a “métier of the aristocrat” small, professional army to the first mass citizen army of the modern world. The success of the Napoleonic era French military in the first five coalition wars cannot be credited to one cause alone. Instead the Revolutionary/Napoleons’ Army (Grande Armée from 1805) had several contributing factors to its major successes.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although colonists had united to raise a militia to fight the French, the British insisted on using British troops and having British Generals in command. Before the 1700’s, British involvement with the colonies was minor which allowed individual colonies to practice their own politics and trade international without regulations. Many generals remarked of the inferiority of Americans and their rude actions and behavior towards British officials. This was a start of many political and economic misunderstandings that caused a backfire to the British that ultimately damaged their empire, their economic standings, and their overall reputation. The war also created an environment that fostered the want for Americans to be equal to English citizens and have the same rights. These views and mindsets encouraged major political philosophies to begin to form, further shaping the American identity of civil rights, liberty, and republicanism. An important factor that separated the Seven Years’ War from other wars between the British and French, was that it was fought in America, thus involving colonial militia and drawing out the major flaws that the British either underestimated or didn’t take into consideration. For example, British subjects didn’t realize the difference between the colonies and England, and the political and economical structure that had formed over the last century in the colonies. By overlooking these important factors, such as the colonies having Assemblies, a democratic form of local government, and controlling international affairs, England underestimated the will of the people and the power of the…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How did the British lose the Revolutionary War? They had more, and better, everything. Such as better soldiers and better training. This would surely give them and advantage. Also the greater amount of supplies should help. But in the end they still lost, it could have been for a…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Revolutionary War was a tragic and painstaking war fought between America and Great Britain from April nineteenth, 1775, to September third, 1783. The main conflict was over America’s longing for independence, and Britain denying them of this freedom. Even though Britain was at the height of its power, and the United States had a ragtag army and limited resources, America was the unlikely victor. While Britain appeared to have the upper hand, America had a few unpredictable advantages. First of all, allies such as France and Spain aided them on many different grounds that pulled them to victory. Strength was also found in the leadership from the generals, particularly George Washington.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Looking back at Revolutionary War, you might question how America successfully defeated the British considering the British army was the best trained and equipped, and possibly the most professional army in the world. In contrast, America was in a state of disorganization when it came to economics and politics. The national government as a whole was greatly powerless. Unlike the British army, the American army was inadequately trained, had little supplies, and was not paid very well. Practically the British had all of the advantages, but the colonies still won their independence.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These soldiers were known as the colonial militia. However, many soldiers of the British regular army believed the colonial militia consisted of low-quality soldiers who came from the scum of society. Most were sure the militia would make little difference in the outcome of the war. In reality, the soldiers of the colonial militia came from all walks of life, endured many hardships, and contributed greatly to the war effort. The ranks of the colonial militia were usually filled by average citizens. They came from all walks of life and different ethnic groups. The colonial militia utilized the use of guerrilla war tactics, which stress both deception and ambush, as opposed to mass confrontation. They used the terrain and fought in a confusing, unorganized fashion which was unheard of by the British. The colonials also used a tactics that was ‘forbidden’ in formal European warfare, the targeting of officers. Orders came from the officers, so if the officers were dead then the army would disintegrate into chaos. This is a very smart tactic on the part of the Americans. It was forbidden in European warfare because all of the officers were aristocrats expected to survive in battle. The commoners were the infantry men and they were the ones that were supposed to die. This was an outrage to the British, the deliberate disrespect the…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition the colonies' governors quarreled with their assemblies. The colonies saw themselves, at the time, as trading economic colonies, not an empire or nation. There was no need or want for a military and military organization. The British colonies were unfit to carry out an offensive war. Victory was meek for the colonies but courageous, fearless and heroic generals like Pitt, Amherst, and Wolf helped turn the tide for the British.…

    • 370 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The foreign policy failures of British governments in the years 1951 to 1964 were due to a lack of realism about Britain's position in the world:…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays