Preview

How Did Lucius Cornelius Sulla Lead To The End Of The Roman Republic?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
924 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Lucius Cornelius Sulla Lead To The End Of The Roman Republic?
Lucius Cornelius Sulla was a well-known optimate Roman general who was able to become a consul twice and a dictator for an unlimited amount of time. While he was holding the position of dictator he got to change numerous laws and establish new ones with the purpose of restoring the law and order of Rome. However, opinions in Rome at this time after his death are divided between those that believe he did a good job and those that believe his actions will cause the end of the Roman republic. As a Roman citizen, I believe his actions will unravel the downfall of the Roman republic. For me, he started his careers with good intentions, but with time he finished it with “evil deeds.” I base my opinion on a series of factors such as the fact that …show more content…
A legal voting was not followed in any way. His ability and power to establish himself as a dictator were so strong that not only he ingrained himself as a dictator, but did so indefinitely until he wanted to. However, at the time he felt he had made the changes that needed to be made, he did resign as dictator, which is what causes so many controversies among the people. Because his actions show two different perspectives, one, his honesty and intentions of truly changing the way Rome was being led at any cost, and the other the man who wanted to be a “reformer” but ended up being a “dictator.” In addition, I believe that by taking Rome by force he also set an example for future generations, one that he will not be able to “abolish.” (Badian, 1) He awoke in others this feeling that if Sulla did it why can’t I?. As a result, I believe it is just a matter of time before someone else tries to establish himself as a tyrant as well. However, I don’t believe that future dictators will have the same idea of resigning to such power as Sulla did, which could represent a real chaos for the …show more content…
Among these reforms, we have one where he restored the time limits for holding office positions like the consulship. He restored it to be like it was originally where a person could be consul for one year after being praetor. In addition, you could be consul more than once but at least 10 years had to pass from one consulship to the next. He set a new age requirement for being praetors and impose strictly the corsus honorum. I think his intentions with these changes were not only to restore the office positions as they were before but also to prevent any of these people from gaining as much power as he did and that could either overthrown him or equalize him. Furthermore, he enlarged the Senate with people that supported him with the end goal of keeping control over Rome and in some way over the Senate as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Information articles, “How Democratic was the Roman Republic?” written by Alan Ward shows the Roman Empire could not be considered democratic because the rome citizens have no likelihood of being able to cast their vote regularly, but a group of unrepresentative voters can easily dominate sovereign popular institution. So wishes of the people as a whole are not expressed.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus Augustus was one of few who went to the extremes of killing his own family members just to keep his new booming Empire up and running. Constantine ruled from 306 A.D. until 337 A.D. During Constantine the Great’s thirty-one years of ruling, he influenced the Roman Empire that affected the Roman people in a virtuous way. He strengthened Christianity in Rome and was a martyr in making Christianity a respected religion, he created economic reforms that helped the common people, and crafted impressive structures throughout the Empire.…

    • 2306 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marcus Aurelius would have had mixed feelings about the collapse of the Roman Empire in the mid-to-late third century AD. An admirer of change, Marcus would have accepted the direction that the Empire was heading in, but not necessarily through the murderous means in which it transpired. He also was an enormous aficionado of living as close to in accordance with nature as was possible and not enjoying an overly lavish lifestyle. Few of the Emperors during the mid-to-late third century AD were overtly careless with their reigns, and most were entirely focused on maintaining defense. According to Aurelius, nothing could be more in accordance with nature than death, or in this case a violent death, which was the fate of every emperor that took…

    • 2049 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Augustus insisted on restoring temples,reviving ancient Roman cults, reformed priesthoods, and even encouraged attendance of public religious festivals. His man focus was restoration of the relationship between God and Roman destiny. Not only did he make reformation towards religion but towards the restoration of traditional Roman virtues within the family structure. Marriage was being strongly encouraged and procreation to have large families were greatly rewarded by Augustus. He actually penalized those who didn't marry and made sure that laws were created to ensure that women didn't have extramarital affairs.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Principate of Tiberius provided stability and prosperity to Rome and its provinces, consolidating the policies and practices established by Augustus. Tiberius worked cooperatively with the Senate and introduced reforms which benefited rule in the provinces and strengthened administration of the empire. While he provided careful oversight of the administration of the Roman Empire and the army, increasingly he sought to delegate his role. He distanced himself from the people with the introduction of the maiestas trials and from the central control of his government by retiring to Capri and relying on Sejanus for information.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He took power in 27 B.C. After this he went by the title Augustus, and during his reign what used to be the roman republic, turned into a empire. It turned into an empire by having a pax romana. Pax romana means roman peace. Taking power away from the senate, having a strong army, and being lead by a brilliant leader all lead to the pax romana which led to an empire. The empire was similar to the republic by the fact that all citizens had a voice in what was done. But its also different by the fact that in the republic the ssenate had a big say in what was done, but in the empire the senate’s say didn’t have as much as affect as it did in the…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sulla's Reforms

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout the time of Sulla's command, Rome underwent many reforms in which were introduced with the intentions to restore the republic. Among Sulla's many attempts to re-establish the traditional roman republic, the most significant were his strong efforts to strengthen the senate, restrict the power of the tribunes and curb the influence of the magistrates.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He proposed the law in hopes that it would aid the many troubles of Rome at the time. He wanted to assist the poor and ease tensions and instability in the urban regions. However, his actions to safeguard this law were unconstitutional and unprecedented. He looked past the law in order to get his own way without much thought of others. These selfish notions are what led to his death and downfall. Even with all of this in consideration, his rivals’ approach to hinder his reelection were even more lawless than Tiberius’ actions in attempts to preserve the agrarian law. Despite the fact that the Romans were aggressive, their actions of attacking and killing Tiberius and his supporters were unjustifiable. There are other ways to stop Tiberius’s reelection. It is possible that voters would decide against reelecting him, which could have prevented his…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gracchi Glory

    • 2365 Words
    • 10 Pages

    “[Gaius] had deprived Senators of judicial powers, interfered in foreign affairs, championed popular sovereignty and made a takeover bid for the patronage of all Italy. His own power was not merely more blatant than that of Tiberius but had lasted twice as long, raising the very real threat of regnum based on popular support. This fear was strengthened when Gaius stood for election a third time, which suggests he was indeed trying to revolutionise, not merely reform, Rome 's…

    • 2365 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is because the actions of Tiberius Gracchus did seem revolutionary to many. For example when he disregarded the authority of the Senate by bringing his land-bill that states that no one is allowed to hold 500 iugera of land and that the children could occupy half the amount straight to the Popular Assembly without going through the Senate (Appian R. Hist. Ex. 9). His actions were based on his knowledge that there will be no fair hearing as most of the senators owned large properties and will be the ones with the biggest loss if the land bill was passed (Scullard 1982 : 26). Other than that, when Tiberius Gracchus passed the law on redistribution of land, the wealthy who are blinded by greed strongly opposed the law and accused Tiberius Gracchus of attempting revolution (Plutarch Gracc. Ex. 9). The event where Tiberius Gracchus decided to run as tribune for the second year without election made it further seem that he was suggesting dictatorship (Appian R. Hist. Ex. 15). Evidence of his political motives can also be seen after the death of King Attalus III of Pergamum. On the will of King Attalus III, it is stated that the Roman people were to inherit the throne of the King. Once again, without regard of the senate’s authority over financial and foreign affairs, Tiberius Gracchus immediately suggested a bill that this inheritance should be used to…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    sulla

    • 632 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Through his time as a General of Rome and a Roman dictator Sulla left behind a legacy of fear and failure, a multitude of problems. Sulla is said to be a contributing factor of the fall of the Roman Empire and had changed Roman history forever.…

    • 632 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Roman Government

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages

    What Influence did Gaius Julius Caesar and Augustus have on the reforms of the government from a Republic to an Empire?…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spartacus was a leader under the old Roman Republic. He is known for starting a rebellion against the Roman Empire in the Third Servile War. There are thoughts that have not been confirmed to this very day but one thing is for sure, Spartacus was able to share a vision with the slaves during the ancient times. There are arguments when it comes to the origins of him. Ancient historians believed that he was Thracian. A lot of authors have closed him in on so many origins that it became hard to keep track of them. Although, he is known to the world as a Thracian who later received training from the Roman army and was then sold to slavery.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Republic Civil War

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Social War would see the rise of Lucius Sulla to both military and political power as he led the southern Legions to victory during the rebellion. Marius had returned from retirement to lead the northern Legions. Once the Social War was ended, this created a power duel between the two commanders. The Republic soon fell into full-scale civil war, requiring Sulla to direct his Legions against Marius’ supporters holding Rome. Sulla became the first general to lead Roman legions against the city of Rome itself. The war would rage on for one and a half years before Sulla prevailed. He then carried out a series of purges to remove his enemies, a political tool that was becoming more and more common in the Republic. With much of his opposition removed and an air of terror instilled, Sulla was appointed dictator, whereby he then doubled the size of the Senate and gave it veto power over the Plebeian Assembly, in effect changing the balance of power in the government. At the same time, this gave him overwhelming support from the Senate. He also stripped the tribunes of much of their power, while limiting the powers of provincial governors. Sulla would resign his dictatorship for a consulship…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Dbq

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There were many things that could have held him back from doing what needed to be done in Rome. Donald McGannon states “leadership is an action, not a position”, and that is what great leaders such as, Gaius Julius Caesar did. Instead of sitting back and governing from a seat like many leaders of today, he took ask and initiated different wars, treaties, reforms and etc but in the end, left a lasting legacy that has impacted generations well over the last 2000 years and will continue to. He may not have always been loved but he was definitely respected by many and imitated in order to leave such a great an impact as…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays