Preview

How Did Lloyd George Fall From Power

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1128 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Lloyd George Fall From Power
‘Lloyd George fell from power in 1922 because of his style of government after 1918.’ To what extent do you agree with this view?

Lloyd George was dominant in politics in 1918. The First World War resulted in an increase in his popularity and in the coalition he was a valuable asset to the conservative party. Various factors, his style of government and its effect on the conservatives, the conservative attitude towards him and finally his poor decisions in policymaking brought about his downfall. These factors collectively led to his downfall, however in the end, the conservatives decided to abandon him because he had outlived his usefulness due to his tarnished reputation and growing unpopularity.

Lloyd George’s
…show more content…
Due to this Lloyd George had to concede to the conservatives at times as he did when they demanded that cuts be made and that Lloyd George agree to the Geddes axe. This was a mistake as it led to him earning a reputation of not fulfilling promises of reconstruction and led to a decline in popularity. The conservatives only needed Lloyd George as long as he was popular with the people and therefore an asset to them, his gradual decline in popularity led to the conservatives questioning his worth. His policies also went against what they stood for the most part and even though they remained loyal to the coalition due to Bonar Law, cracks appeared when Austen Chamberlain replaced him as leader of conservatives. However, it can argued that the conservatives were being pragmatic in letting Lloyd George introduce some social reform, especially since working class had received the vote. This did not deter backbenchers and die hards who grew in number and in criticism of Lloyd George’s policies, which culminated in the formation of the anti-waste league who won two by-elections, evidence that they held influence. As Lloyd George’s unpopularity grew so did the conservative attitude change towards him except in the senior members, which also led to the fear that a split may emerge over loyalty to the coalition. …show more content…
The conservatives vastly supported his policy at first but due to his presidential style of government all the mistakes were blamed on him with the conservatives barely receiving any criticism. The conservatives and unionists resented his policy on Ireland. It also in the short term led to violence and damaged his credibility in the eyes of the public. There was mass unemployment and threat of strikes as the trade unions grew, causing further disruption. Lloyd George also kept taxation at wartime level, which was unpopular with lower classes, which consequently led to the working class electorate to support Labour in big cities like Sheffield. It can be argued that his policies and decision making led to a decrease in his popularity and worsening of relations with the conservatives. Even though his policies were successful at first the poor economy ensured that they could not be implemented fully leading to frustration in the public who expected Lloyd George to deliver on his promises. Britain had lost most of its export markets after the war and therefore it had a reduced income, policies such as the insurance act only put further strain on the economy. Early success with housing and industrial relations were overshadowed by economic problems, which Lloyd George failed to address.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The government could not fumction without money so the issue was put to the voters to decide. The Conservatives had to win a large number of seats in order to justify their rejection of the budget, however they did not and ithe election was therefore a defeat for the Conservatives. However, the Liberals no longer had an overall majority in the commons so they could only get their bills passed if they got the support of the Labour party and Irish Nationalists. The Irish Nationalists would only give their support in return for granting of Home Rule for Ireland, so the Liberal party had to include Home Rule in their policy. The Liberals were reliant on the Labour Party as Labour would only support them in return for favourable legislation for trade unions, assistance for working class candidates to become MPs. This allowed the Labour Party to develop links with uniona and allowed them to field more candidates at future elections, enabling them to challenge the Liberal Party; weakening the Liberals. After the election the budget was re-introduced into parliament and was passed by both…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time Labour was a significantly divided party with the Gaitskillites and the Bevanites meaning some support of voters was lost through lack of assurance that the party would lead with strength and could make decisions that were right for the nation and not selfish. The Labour economy policies are also a reason why they lost. Gaitskell promised to increase public spending without increasing taxes. This put his credibility under question. Another reason is that although voters were happy with the nationalisation of electricity, gas, atomic energy and airline industries they thought public ownership of coal and the railways had been a failure when they were last in government and there was little enthusiasm for further nationalisation which Labour was committed to by Clause Four of the Labour Party Constitution.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Balfour's character consisted of a very cautious, indecisive man which came across when faced with Chamberlain and his debate on 'tariff reform', which stated that all non-British colonies should have to pay tariffs on imports into Britain, making foreign goods more expensive. At this time free trade was thoroughly indented into British society and nearly all voters were against the idea. Despite Balfour expressing his opinion that he had no settled convictions for tariff reform, when he was faced with the endorsement of tariff reform by a 'retaliationist' who embraced tariffs as the most effective means of forcing protectionist nations to the negotiating table, Balfour consistently rejected the protectionist argument which Chamberlain endorsed. When its ambiguity provoked conflict within the Conservative Party, Balfour’s failure to clarify his policy or assert his authority only exacerbated the confusion and bitterness. Balfour’s reputation paid a high price for this indecisive leadership. If this wasn't enough Balfour resigned in 1905 without asking for a general election, leaving the party extremely angry and had to appoint Campbell-Bannerman to take his place.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source B is a book extract by Peter Rowland describing the experiences of Lloyd George. Its purpose is of course, to inform. This Source somewhat contradicts source A. Here, the audience at a peace meeting seem to become enraged at the fact Lloyd George was…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Liberal government of 1906-1914 under Bannerman and Asquith is one often recalled for its extensive reform of the welfare system in the United Kingdom. However, it was their political and constitutional reform which caused the most uproar, as they were arguably the most successful government of the 20th century in regards to changing the way Britain was governed. Their greatest achievement was the 1911 Parliament Act where they managed to get the Lords to sign a bill limiting their own power.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Want' aimed to provide cash benefits to the people who needed them; 'Disease' aimed to provide the National Health Service; Ignorance aimed to provide free compulsory education; Squalor aimed to help people who were homeless due to the war by providing more houses; Idleness aimed to provide full employment. These were all major issues during wartime Britain and the Labour Party's support in their cleansing was a huge factor in their victory at the 1945 general…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the 1924 Labour government was undoubtedly one of the most important developments in party politics, there were other factors that contributed to the change from Liberal vs Conservatives in the 1880 to Labour vs conservative with Liberal's downfall by 1951. The 1924 Labour government was arguably a significant development as it was the first time Labour won an election, proving they had progressed from a small independent party to a real opponent of the Conservatives. This was significant as it showed that Labour had finally gotten their foot in the door and how Conservatives had not fully recovered from their decline in the previous 2 decades. The win was a huge shock to the Conservatives, but they won in a weak position and only lasted 10 months.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The split of the Conservative in 1846 due to the repeal of the Corn Laws and the following death of Bentinck were important factors in allowing Disraeli to become the leader of the Conservative Party. Disraeli was instrumental in the split of the Conservative Party, being the leader of the vicious attacks on the authority and reputation of Sir Robert Peel. Despite being a fantastic showcase of his speaking abilities, these attacks led to many of the more experienced and higher status politicians leaving the Conservatives Party, to join Peel in the Peelites group. The split left the Conservatives with little leadership, and it also opportunely put Disraeli in contact with Lord George Bentinck who status ensured that many of the remaining Conservatives were happy to follow the pair. Coinciding with Disraeli’s seeming reinvention, in 1847, he became ‘Knight of the Shire’ of Bucks and financed by his new patrons the Bentinck’s, he became a true dandy, more of a landed country gentleman. The death of Bentinck in 1848 left Disraeli as the only potential leader of the Conservatives, in the House of Commons. The split of the Conservative Party and Bentinck’s death were important in Disraeli’s emergence, however it was his oratory and political skill which largely caused the split, therefore being an underlying cause of a factor of his own success.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the1870s, the Conservative Party won three out of four elections and formed the government for 17 years out of a total of 20 years. It reflected the Conservative Party was the most powerful party in England at that time; they even had an overpowering majority of seats in the House of Lords. They had support from everywhere. However, the situation changed dramatically when the Liberal party won the general election in 1906 with an overwhelming majority of 400 seats as against 157 seats for the Conservatives party. This event was marked as the well-known ‘Liberal landslide’. There are several reasons why the Conservative lost such a large amount of seats; national efficiency, the imposition of Education Act and Licensing Act, tariff campaign and Neglect of social reform.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Gladstone was a leader of the Liberal Party in 1867 and became prime minister the following year. Gladstone's ideas involved simplifying the tax system and abolishing hundreds of duties. He was prime minister four times and spoke for human rights and against atrocities in the world. His opponent, Benjamin Disraeli served as Chancellor of the Exchequer and leader of the House of Commons. Disraeli’s goal was to make conservatism relevant again and create ideas of reform for the working class.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Liberals created many reforms which impacted the lives of British people differing between aid and attention for well being of all ages and insurance for the unemployed or sick. This essay will investigate whether they were of positive or negative on the British people.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. How far do you agree? Between 1951 and 1964, the Conservative's time in power, the Labour party were providing ineffectual opposition. One of the reasons for this was their internal disputes over issues such as unilateralism. However, there were also more important reasons for Conservative dominance, such as the economy and growing prosperity in Britain, the property owning democracy and the greater availability of credit, modern conveiniences and luxury items. Prosperity during this time was growing, and people were in general wealthier than they had been before. A reason for this could have been the manipulation of the economy by the Conservatives; their stop-and-go stagflation lowered and rose taxes in accordance to the election date in order to gain more votes. Though they had no real long-term economic plan and their wily manipulation was often criticised, it did help them to gain votes. The wages also rose during this time meaning people were able to more freely afford luxury items and other things such as mortgages, which links to the property owning democracy.…

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indeed, a major reason for Labour’s victory was because Harold Wilson advocated a campaign for economic modernisation of Britain so the nation did not fall behind the excelling economies of European rivals such as West Germany. Economists raise the significant point that economic modernisation looks at the internal dynamics of a nation while referring to social and cultural structures and the adaptation of new technologies. The Conservatives failed in every social and economic aspect of this theory, as shown in 1963, as unemployment reached approximately 800,000 making a mockery of Macmillan’s, ‘never had it so good speech.’ The inability of the Conservative Party to economically modernise Britain led not only to their downfall in the 1964 election, but also to the collapse of Britain’s economy during this era. Economists point out that as a result of Conservative mismanagement of the economic sectors, Britain faced financial hardships, including a huge balance of payments deficit, which undeniably caused higher levels of inflation, causing the cost of living for ordinary British people to rise. Moreover, the economic boom of the late 1950s and the, ‘Age of Affluence,’ had reached its end, with great saturation in the markets for consumer goods. Inevitably, poor…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Federalist were a powerful and incredibly influential party in the nations beginning history. Their party was packed with influential, men such as Alexander Hamilton, George Washington and Charles Pinckney. Although they are an example of great parties in our nation, they are also a tragic example of the quickness of political downfall. The Federalists’ downfall was caused mainly by the personalities of their party members, and therefore the collective personality of the party, namely their stubbornness, arrogance, inability to adapt their beliefs to public opinion, their tendency to argue every detail of decisions, and their various loses in power and loses of members.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first American political parties were crafted early in American history. Primarily economic issues shaped the fundamental Hamiltonian and Jeffersonian political positions during the George Washington and John Adams administrations, prior to Thomas Jefferson’s presidency. Washington more commonly agreed with the Federalist approach to government, he agreed with this approach with the Proclamation of Neutrality as well as his position on The Bank of the United States. Although George Washington condemned the existence of political factions, he was forced to agree with either one faction or another, due to the apparent economic, social, and foreign issues, including the French Revolution, America’s neutrality, and America’s economy overall.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays