As the New Poor Law of 1834 came into place it meant the abolition of any existing forms of poor relief. It was presumed that ending poor relief would encourage the poor to look for jobs (they also believed that poverty was the result of laziness), however their understanding of these kind of issues was an ill educated guess and not appropriate. The movement against the Poor Law was very strong in the North of England which had hit an economic crisis in the textile industry and many were beginning to feel the strains. It was estimated that 400,000 handloom weavers (an influential group of people supporting Chartism) were soon to be in financial ruin. The movement for an end to the Poor Laws became instant upon its creation and whilst many people got poorer, it was those same people whose voting rights were nonexistent. The economic depression in the North was during 1837-38 so clearly economic difficulties were also a major factor to support
As the New Poor Law of 1834 came into place it meant the abolition of any existing forms of poor relief. It was presumed that ending poor relief would encourage the poor to look for jobs (they also believed that poverty was the result of laziness), however their understanding of these kind of issues was an ill educated guess and not appropriate. The movement against the Poor Law was very strong in the North of England which had hit an economic crisis in the textile industry and many were beginning to feel the strains. It was estimated that 400,000 handloom weavers (an influential group of people supporting Chartism) were soon to be in financial ruin. The movement for an end to the Poor Laws became instant upon its creation and whilst many people got poorer, it was those same people whose voting rights were nonexistent. The economic depression in the North was during 1837-38 so clearly economic difficulties were also a major factor to support