Preview

How Did Ancient Civilisation Impact On Everyday Life

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1289 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Ancient Civilisation Impact On Everyday Life
Ancient warfare and its impact on daily life and the views of people

RQ- To what extent did the warfare of these ancient civilisation impact everyday life and the views of people?

Warfare was one of the main causes for the expansion of a civilisation. Some civilisations were lucky to some find land uninhabited and ready for urbanisation, whilst others had to conquer land and the people of the land. Even after the land was conquered, armies fought to defend the newly conquered land from different groups, kingdoms and empires that were trying to gain, or regain, control of the area. The reason behind the vast numbers of the armies are the inhabitants of the civilisations and the land they conquered. Generally, men, lower on the hierarchy, were forced to join the army. Sometimes men had a choice, and there were times where this enrollment, forceful or not, didn’t happen because there was no war or social uprisings. This changed the views of people and the support given to the army, inturn.

The Romans were one of the few armies with great power and optional enrollment. Only roman men
…show more content…
The people change their views depending on the actions others take. The armies take some extreme measures at times, which makes the people respect them or not. Sometimes only a few families are negatively affected by some actions which have a positive effect on others. The strength of the army also determined if nobles and commoners backed the army in any campaigns, providing support and food. The army and warfare have a very large impact on the daily lives of people. They impact the way families feel about them, in turn affecting their support. The people fuel the army, both physically and spiritually. Inturn the army provides land (from conquests) and protection. The military and the people both feed each other and are both very beneficial for the kingdom and it’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    If warfare was just a natural instinct that all humans had then all groups of people around the world would use warfare to further their civilization. Instead, since warfare is an invention of man instead of a natural part of humanity some groups around the world no nothing of warfare whatsoever. Along with these groups there are also many groups, like the Pueblo Indians who only used warfare to defend their civilization, and did not use war to expand their own lands and influence. Had it not been for another group bringing war to them they would have most likely never partaken in war themselves.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Technological advancements could play a role in this area to explain the change in the trajectory, but the author’s rejection of technological answers does not allow him to do this. Also, Lynn concentrates on institutional factors (recruitment, social composition, and motivation, command administration) to describe his model for evolution yet at various occasions he emphasizes political-economic, military competitiveness, and minimally technological advancements as his explanatory factors for change. Lynn does not clearly give explanation to what brought on the change in different army styles. In one army style military unreliability, increased political centralization, and increased economic monetarization are emphasized and in other centuries technological improvements or political costs are seen as the most influential. In this way Lynn’s explanatory factors are not internally consistent from century to century. For example, if technology had an impact in one time period than Lynn does not give valid reasoning for why it was not considered important in another…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome before 264BC

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman army before 264BC was a citizens’ army, comprised of farmers and the population, with very little to no full time soldiers. Every man was expected to provide his own gear, and as such it was very difficult to recruit the poor or slaves to fight, and when they were recruited, it was at the expense of the state. Another problem with a citizens’ army is that they are not full time soldiers, and many are often inexperienced in combat, and lacked the training necessary to be truly superior to any opponent.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With reference to source 14 and other sources explain the role of the kings in Spartan society.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another major factor as to why the French force was successful during this time period was the quality of its soldiers, most important trait being the high moral and belief in the idea of both the French Republic and Napoleon. The command, control and organization of the army was a vital asset into explaining its’ success during this time. Societal factors are also apparent when evaluating the reasons for success of Napoleon’s force during these wars. Adoption of conscription and the development of the doctrine of total war would mean that war involved the entire of a nation’s society. The most important factor however would be the individual leadership qualities of Napoleon himself, being able to use the other factors together in order to obtain the victories during the first five coalition wars. Nevertheless French success can also be credited to the failure of the coalition powers in the majority of these factors and the lack their lack of military…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Initially soldiers joined the fight with a sense of patriotism and nationalistic pride. A steady income was also appealing to any man willing to fight. The war was deadly and brutal to the…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In New Kingdom Egypt, the military became very important. The army evolved from being a disorganised band of conscripted peasants into a lethal, professional outfit well equipped and ready for combat. Egypt became the most expansionist it had even been in its history. The emergence of Egypt’s army started in the 18th Dynasty when Ahmose expelled the Hyksos from Egypt. Tuthmosis I and Tuthmosis III and also Ramses II and Ramses III further maintained Egypt’s military strength in campaigns ranging from Nubia to Syria.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Successor Empires

    • 3500 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The barbarian forces were able to effectively invade the roman empire and the military fighting was used to show the power of the ruler. Traditionally the Roman forces were paid in fee regularly whilst the Barbarians were not due to the lack of a tax system. The men enlisted to fight were often men from the aristocrats’ army and the king’s men (a small proportion of the total population). If a war leader was successful they are able to set up a post- roman regime like Clovis. In this period there…

    • 3500 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jim Borgman's War On Iraq

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rationally most find it noble to enter into a cause such as the military, it gives one a true sense of pride. But the reality of it is…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human life is interrupted for the chance to win a war. As World War I began, the United States had a smaller army. So, to increase the size, the government drafted men into the army, with and without…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pride In The Iliad

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The history of wars and battles can be dated back almost to the beginning of time and has since been a prominent motif in stories from various cultures and religions. Centuries later, descriptions of fighting styles to warriors to weapons, has greatly evolved. Despite the constant evolution of the ways fighting is portrayed, one thing has remained consistent over the years: the reason for initiating war. When a man’s pride is wounded, the idea that he will stop at nothing to restore it, can be seen throughout literature in many different cultures. Through the malicious and extravagant battles exhibited in The Iliad, the idea that vengeance is sought once an individual's pride has been harmed and can only be resolved by combat, is developed.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I ranked agricultural intensification first on my list of the seven most important aspects of a civilization. I did this because, agricultural intensification allowed Mesopotamians to manipulate their land for the purpose of producing large amounts of food. Agricultural intensification allowed the people of Mesopotamia to thrive as they had plenty of food to eat and store. I ranked agricultural intensification first because it allowed the government to feed its people and as a result give its population a chance to grow. As the population grows more people can work and the civilization can advance, through specialization of trades.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rise of civilizations began with the settling of nomads. It was the end of hunting and gathering and the beginning of agriculture based civilizations. Early civilizations commonly settled near bodies of water for resources, created a form of writing, established a form of government, developed a form of religion, and established a hierarchy system. All of these are common features in the history of the rise of civilizations.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the world gradually evolved and its people became more intelligent, major changes caused by different things occurred. One of the most significant of these changes was the impact of agriculture on social structures during the Neolithic era. During the Neolithic era, agriculture drastically changed the social structure of Neolithic people. It greatly and permanently altered the building blocks of the Neolithic social structure which included roles, statuses, social classes, and influence. During the early stages of the Neolithic era, Neolithic villagers had only two separate roles based off gender. Male Neolithic people were hunters; suppliers of meat from large game animals. On the other hand female Neolithic people were foragers; seekers/pickers…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fall of the Roman Empire

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of the problems facing the Roman military was a complete lack of manpower. To attempt to correct this Rome actively recruited from the various Germanic tribes. Eventually whole units, including the officer corps, were made up of Germans. This completely changed the identity of the Roman army, the professionalism and expertise that had existed for centuries would never again be present on the battlefield.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays