Preview

How Can The Supreme Court Rule Law Unconstitutional

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
596 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Can The Supreme Court Rule Law Unconstitutional
The Supreme Court is a part of the Judicial Branch in the federal government. There is always a debate about what it can and can not do. People ask the question all the time, ‘Can the Supreme Court rule laws unconstitutional?’. The Supreme Court can rule laws unconstitutional, it has the power to overturn unconstitutional laws, that power is part of the checks and balances system that is in place to keep the power equal between all three branches of the government.

The Supreme Court is the highest federal court in the United States. In the Supreme Court are 8 chief justices, all of which are appointed by the president. Justices then serve in the Supreme Court till their death or until they retire. In February of this year the Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died at the age of 79. His death created an even number of justices, going from 9 to 8 currently making it more difficult for them to make decisions due to the fact that I could be tied 4 – 4. There is an argument wether President Obama should replace the justice in the election year or wait and let the next president choose.
…show more content…
Stated in Article III section 2 of the constitution are the powers of the Supreme Court, “The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made,…” (U.S Const. article III. sec 2). One of the most important cases that dealt with what the powers of the Supreme Court was Marbury v Madison. Marbury v Madison was a landmark Supreme Court case because the out come helped form the country we have today. The case out come created a boundary between the judicial and the executive branches of the United

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison:(1803) Judicial review In 1801, Justice William Marbury was to have received a commission from President Adams, but Secretary of State James Madison refused to issue the commission. Chief Justice Marshall stated that the Judiciary Act of 1789, which was the basis for Marbury's claim, conflicted with Article III of the Constitution. Marbury did not receive the commission. This case determined that the Supreme Court and not the states would have the ultimate word on whether an issue was in violation of the Constitution. The ruling, based on judicial review, made the Judicial Branch equal to the other two branches of government.…

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since its creation in the late 18th century, the Supreme Court has made numerous decisions that impacted the course of history. The Supreme Court has a very important job, to interpret the constitution principles and make decisions based on these important standards. Had it not been for the rulings made by this court, many laws and precedents may not have been adapted. One case that had an exceptionally important impact on history was the case of Muller vs. Oregon. This case is one of the most influential decisions in Supreme Court history and its impacts are still seen even today.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Its is emphatically, the province and duty of the judicial department, to say what the law is.” (Ducat, Craig Constitutional Interpretation p. 10) These seventeen words written two hundred years ago made the highest court in the United States supreme, and making it so, Chief Justice John Marshall’s words in that sentence continue to make an impact on every Supreme Court case thereafter. Justice Marshall laid the basic foundations to protect the Federal system that was established by the Constitution. In Marbury v. Madison, McCulloch v. Maryland, and Gibbons v. Ogden the Supreme Court maintained the United States as a federal state.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court is supposed to interpret the Constitution as it pertains to each case before the court. These decisions then affect public policy and application of the laws. Sometimes laws can be rendered nullified or unenforceable. In some newer cases that deal with internet or other technologies not present at the time of creation, extend beyond the reach of the Constitution, the Supreme Court must interpret how the Constitutional laws should affect the case. This affects the way U. S. society sees the Constitution as it pertains to them.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the Constitution was created, some topics were explained in great detail, yet some were explained very vaguely causing many disputes over how certain topics should be dealt with. In Article III, it states how the Judicial Branch works. It decides what the court bases their decisions on. In Article II of the U.S. Constitution it states how a justice must be replaced, who picks the new justice, which is the president, yet there is no time frame stated on how long it must take to pick a new justice. The president of the United States is to pick the new justice and the Senate confirms it. After a sudden death to Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia, the decision must be made to pick a new justice now or to allow the new…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs Madison Case

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page

    The factors that lead up to the case of Marbury v. Madison are the president that was leaving the office, John Adams, had issued a commission as justice of the peace. What happened was that the new Secretary of State, James Madison, had refused to deliver it. Marbury then sued in order to obtain his commission. The decision that was made by the Supreme Court was that a law that was passed by Congress and signed by the president was declared unconstitutional. There was nothing written in the Constitution that specific power to do that. Chief Justice Marshall believed that the Supreme Court should have an equal role just like the other two branches of government. The future case that was impacted by this case was the Martin…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial review in the United States under Article III of the Constitution. The decision helped define the boundary between the constitutionally separate executive and judicial branches of the American form of…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Marshall strengthened the power of the federal government by expanding the power of the federal judiciary. Becoming Supreme Court Justice in 1801, John Marshall defined the judicial branch as a power in the US government for the first time. Before this point in time the judicial branch was weak and served little purpose. The Supreme Court had little power to check and balance the legislative and executive branches as intended. Marshall’s rulings on controversial cases like Marbury v. Madison (1803), Fletcher v. Peck (1809), and McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) laid the foundation for what we know today as a powerful judicial branch.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Government Branches

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Judicial Branch explains the meaning of the Constituion and laws confirmed by Congress through court cases. The Supreme Court is the head of the Judicial Branch. The Supreme Court rules usually when something is constitutional or unconstitutional. On the Supreme Court there are nine judges: eight associate judges and one cheif judge. The judges are submitted by the President and authorized by the Senate. There are no term limits. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the U.S. It's rules and decisions are final. There's no argument, no other court could ever overrule those…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    requested a writ of mandamus to the Supreme Court to order the Executive Officer, President Thomas Jefferson, to allow him and his colleagues to take their office as justices of peace from the appointment by John Adams, former President. The Supreme Court first had to decide as to whether the appointment was valid and that the commission had been completed. In the reasoning of the Court, they looked upon section two of Article II of the Constitution which states "The President shall nominate, and, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and all other officers of the United States." Section three of Article II states "He shall commission all the officers of the United States." The Supreme Court came to the conclusion that the commission was valid because the constitutional power of appointment had been conducted when John Adams signed the appointment, the Secretary of State, James Madison, had placed the seal of the United States by the President's signature and the Secretary of State had recorded it into the books. Therefore, the commission was valid, and Marbury was due his commission even though it was never transmitted to…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marbury v. Madison

    • 1386 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In a the year of 1803 a watershed case, Marbury v. Madison, John Marshal Chief Justice's opinion founded the Supreme Court's power to declare acts of United States Congress, and by significance acts of the president, unconstitutional if they surpassed the authorities allowed by the Establishment or Constitution. But most significant thing was that the Court became the judge of the Constitution, the final authority on what the document meant. Intrinsically, the Supreme Court became as a matter of fact also as in theory an equal partner in authorities, and it has acted that role always later on (Erskine P.88-109).…

    • 1386 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Supreme Court of the United States has the highest authority in the Judicial Branch and is the third branch of government. The function of the Supreme Court is to interpret the Constitution. The Supreme Court looks at federal and state statues and executive actions to determine if they comply with the United States Constitution. On the Supreme Court, there are nine justices that hear cases that have been appealed through the justice system. When the Supreme Court rules in a case that is the last and final ruling for the defendant.…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Models

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Supreme Court justices have a serious job of determining if something is unconstitutional or not. As with any big decision, there is a precise manor in which the justices decide weather an act is unconstitutional. There are three models that’s the courts follow. The first is the legal model. The legal model states that the court can base their rulings off of the previous rulings of the lower courts. The positive of this model is that the Supreme Court justices have a good background on what went on in the previous court and they can use that in order to interpret the constitution. The negative of this model is that the justices don’t have a clean interpretation of what happened. They are basing all of their knowledge on the last judges ruling,…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the primary foundations for the power which it exercises over the American judicial system is the basics of judicial review. This power consists of the ability of the Supreme Court to decide upon “review” that a piece of some form of Government action is not permitted under the Constitution and can be deemed “unconstitutional”. The Supreme Court established this idea early in its existence and was empowered as a vital institution in the American Government primarily by exercising it. Judicial review is controversial because an unelected group is charged with interpreting the Constitution and the validity of laws affecting the population. Judicial review should be void of all political favoring, however, the power granted to a body that is not accountable to the public can be seen as an imbalance in the checks and balances intended by the three branch system of democracy in the United States.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    United States Supreme Court; the highest appellate court in the Federal judicial system. This court is tasked with taking on its own cases and normally takes from lower courts that struggle with defining Federal law. The nine justices are appointed for life by the president and reflect the highest responsibility. The United States Supreme Court is ultimately responsible for interpreting the United States Constitution and applying it to enforcement, prosecution…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays