Preview

Hotel Branding Strategy: Its Relationship to Guest Satisfaction and Room Revenue

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4661 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hotel Branding Strategy: Its Relationship to Guest Satisfaction and Room Revenue
O’Neill, Mattila / HOTEL JOURNAL OF HOSPIT BRANDING STRA 10.1177/1096348004264081& TOURISM RESEARCH ALITY TEGY

ARTICLE

HOTEL BRANDING STRATEGY: ITS RELATIONSHIP TO GUEST SATISFACTION AND ROOM REVENUE
John W. O’Neill Anna S. Mattila The Pennsylvania State University
U.S. hotel brands and international hotel brands headquartered in the United States have increasingly evolved away from being hotel operating companies to being brand management and franchise administration organizations. This trend has allowed for the accelerated growth and development of many major hotel brands, and the increasing growth of franchised hotels. There are numerous strategic implications related to this trend. This study seeks to analyze some of these strategic implications by evaluating longitudinal data regarding the performance of major hotel brands in the marketplace, both in terms of guest satisfaction and revenue indicators. Specifically, the authors test whether guest satisfaction at various U.S. and international brands influences both brand occupancy percentage and average daily room rate 3 years later. In addition, the authors investigate whether the percentage of franchised hotel properties influences both guest satisfaction and occupancy 3 years later. Also, they test whether overall brand size has a positive or detrimental effect on future hotel occupancy. Finally, whether the change in guest satisfaction for hotel brands effects the change in average daily rate during the same 3-year period is tested. KEYWORDS: strategy; brand; franchise; quality; guest satisfaction; lodging

Today’s lodging guests are seeking consistency and quality at the right price (Dube & Renaghan, 2000). Consequently, lodging operators have turned their attention to guest satisfaction and branding because brand name operates as a “shorthand” for quality by giving the guest important information about the product/service sight unseen (Briucks, Zeithaml & Naylor, 2000; Jacoby, Szybillo &



References: Aaker, D. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York: Free Press. Aaker, D (1996). Building strong brands. New York: Free Press. Anderson, E., & Mittal, V. (2000, November). Strengthening the satisfaction-profit chain. Journal of Service Research, 3, 107-120. Anderson, E., Fornell, C., & Lehman, D. (1994, July), Customer satisfaction, market share and profitablity: Findings from Sweden, Journal of Marketing, 53, 53-66. Appraisal Institute. (2001). The Appraisal of Real Estate (12th ed.). Chicago: Author. The best hotels. (1998, June). Consumer Reports, 12-17. The brand report: The 50 largest U.S. hotel chains. (2000, August). Lodging Hospitality, 45-46. Briucks, M., Zeithaml V., & Naylor, G. (2000). Price and brand name as indicators of quality dimensions for consumer durables. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(3), 359-374. Caminal, R., & Vives, X. (1996, Summer). Why market shares matter: An informationbased theory. Rand Journal of Economics, 27, 221-239. Damonte, T., Rompf, P., Bahl, R., & Domke, D. (1997). Brand affiliation and property size effects on measures of performance in lodging properties, Journal of Hospitality Research, 20(3), 1-16. Dube, L. & Renaghan, L. (2000). Creating visible customer value: How customers view best-practice champions, The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 62-72. Ekinci, Y. (2002). A review of theoretical debates on the measurement of service quality: Implications for hospitality research, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 26(3), 199-216. Fornell, C. (1992, January). A national customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experiment, Journal of Marketing, 56, 6-21. Fornell, C. (1995). The quality of economic output: Empirical generalizations about its distribution and relationship to market share. Marketing Science, 14(3), G203-11. Harris, J. L. (2003, January 13). A solid investment. Hotel & Motel Management, 218(1), 36-44. 10 JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY & TOURISM RESEARCH Hellofs, L., & Jacobson, R. (1999). Market share and customers’ perceptions of quality: When can firms grow their way to higher versus lower quality, Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 16-25. Jacoby, J., Szybillo, G., & Busato-Schach, J. (1977). Information acquisition behavior in brand choice situations, Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 209-215. Jiang, W., Dev, C., & Rao, V. (2002). Brand extension and customer loyalty: Evidence from the lodging industry, The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 43(4), 5-16. Linder, D. (2001). Q&A: A few choice words. National Real Estate Investor, 43(2), 80-81. Michael, S. (2000). The effect of organizational form on quality: The case of franchising. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43(3), 295-318. O’Neill, J. W., & Lloyd-Jones A. R. (2001). Hotel values in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 42(6) 10-21. Partlow, C. G. (1993). How Ritz-Carlton applies “TQM.” The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 34(4) 16-24. Prasad, K., & Dev, C. (2000). Measuring hotel brand equity: A customer-centric framework for assessing performance,” The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 41(3) 22-31. Rust, R., Moorman, C., & Dickson, P. (2002, October). Getting return on quality: Revenue expansion, cost reduction or both? Journal of Marketing, 66(4), 7-24. Shocker, S., Srivastava, R., & Ruekert, R. (1994, May). Challenges and opportunities facing brand management: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 149-158. Suite dreams. (2001, July). Consumer Reports, 12-18. The Wall Street Journal. (2002, May 20). B11. Walsh, J. P. (2002, September 16). Cendant focuses on improving quality: Franchisees applaud new program. Hotel & Motel Management, 217(16), 1-78. Submitted December 3, 2002 First Revision Submitted March 30, 2003 Final Revision Submitted July 15, 2003 Accepted August 23, 2003 Refereed Anonymously John W. O’Neill, MAI, CHE, Ph.D. (e-mail: jwo3@psu.edu), is the assistant professor in the School of Hotel, Restaurant and Recreation Management at the Pennsylvania State University (233 Mateer Building, University Park, PA 16802-1307); Anna S. Mattila, Ph.D. (e-mail: asm6@psu.edu) is an Assistant Professor in the School of Hotel, Restaurant and Recreation Management in the Pennsylvania State University (224 Mateer Building, University Park, PA 16802-1307).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Peaceful Rest Motor Lodge

    • 1890 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hayes, D. (2005). Pearson - Hotel Operations Management, 2/E - David K. Hayes & Jack D. Ninemeier (Vol. 2E): Prentice Hall.…

    • 1890 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Dev, C, Strok, L, 2007 “Rosewood Hotels and Resorts: Branding to Increase Customer Profitability and Lifetime Value" Harvard Business School Publishing. Taken From JWMI 2012…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    week 6 Strategic plan

    • 3603 Words
    • 13 Pages

    As stated previously, Hyatt’s primary goal is to “be the preferred brand.” Because of this, Hyatt continually develops various strategies to stay on par with that initial goal. One form of a strategy, which allows an organization to focus on delivering superior customer value, is known as value strategies. Through this focus, a company can incorporate a variety of the three methods. These methods are operational excellence, customer intimacy, and product leadership (Pearce & Robinson, 2013). For purposes of this strategy a focus on the implementation of customer intimacy, as it relates to Hyatt Regency will be provided.…

    • 3603 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It may be safe to assume that individually owned brands like Rosewood may attract the ‘vacation’ customers more than the corporate brands that typically attract the ‘business travelers’. This is because, a business traveler may not be too concerned about a ‘unique’ experience while on a business trip, while this factor may be an important one for the ‘vacation customer’. Also, corporate brands may have mutually beneficial ties with the large corporates that have geographically distributed business activities, owing to their wider geographic presence (compared with the individually owned resorts). Now, knowing that a Rosewood customer values the “A sense of place” feeling, and the unique experience that Rosewood provides, it becomes very important for Rosewood to keep this customer preference in mind if and while rebranding its image. The centralized reservation system should enable Rosewood to keep a track of customer preferences, based on geographic or demographic segments.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rosewood

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rosewood Hotels & Resorts, L.L.C, was established in 1979 by the Caroline Rose Hunt Trust Estate. This collection of high end luxury hotels has up to 2004 implemented an individual brand/collection brand strategy built around the “sense of place” concept. This concept tailors their hotels to capture the local architecture, history and culture, differentiating them from corporate branded hotels. Despite Rosewood’s performance of having the highest average per room daily room rate and revenue, and recognition amongst travel agents, brand recognition amongst their guests is low. President and CEO, John Scott, and vice president of sales and marketing, Robert Boulogne, are considering a new corporate brand strategy(CBS) aiming to promote their corporate brand. Rosewood serves a niche market which is a small subset of the whole luxury industry of sophisticated customers, who value the distinct exclusive ‘collection’ hotel of the overall luxury market. The goal of the new strategy is to boost brand recognition, increase multi-property stays per guest, realize growth potential and increase their customer lifetime value.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Strategic issues and problems: The following report will describe and analyze the case of a private hotel management company called “Rosewood Hotels and Resorts”. Rosewood hotels have 12 distinctive hotels worldwide with a strong brand image that makes each property unique. The dilemma found in this case is whether to keep the current individual branding strategy or create a corporate branding strategy, without undercutting the distinctiveness of each hotel. To do so the following points will be covered:    Recommendation on individual versus corporate branding strategies. Qualitative analysis considering pros and cons of each branding strategy Quantitative analysis estimating the impact of Rosewood’s corporate branding strategy on customer lifetime value (CLTV)…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rosewood Case Solution

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Luxury hotel segment is getting more competitive. Rosewood Hotels & Resorts have been competing in this segment more than 25 years with its distinctive individual hotel brands. On the contrary, guests want to see one unique brand, same quality and service at every hotel that they stay under one corporate brand name.…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rosewood Case Study

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rosewood brand suffers from low brand recognition while Rosewood’s customers are increasingly getting attracted towards hotels with strong corporate brands as highlighted by the Strategic Marketing Solutions report in 2003. John and Robert are considering switching to corporate branding to increase brand awareness amongst Rosewood’s guests and promote cross property usage to increase customer retention. In 2003, property specific loyalty is high amongst Rosewood’s customers with 40% return visits, however; only 5% of them had stayed in more than one Rosewood property while corporate brands enjoy cross property usage rates of 10-15%.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    IHG analysis

    • 352 Words
    • 12 Pages

    -­‐ selectivity of the brand (share's price) -­‐ tailored customer services Marketing weaknesses: With 11 different hotel brands, IHG has a wide offer of hotel standards. This may sometime be misleading for the customer whom can be lost in the multiple options offered to him. IHG has yet to diversify its activities in order to integrate the different aspect of the tourism industry. China is an important market, they haven’t opened yet their dedicated line of hotels.…

    • 352 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rosewood Hotels

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Individual branding has many posivitive aspects. In this approach the company operates different properties, hotels in this case, with different brand names. In this collection strategy, each property has its own unique name, image and identity. This allows a company to position its properties or brands differently. In Rosewood case, we see that the company created its own unique philosophy, “ Sense of Place”. Each hotel that Rosewood owns reflects the local culture. Each hotel has its unique characteristics such as architectural details and interiors. Individual branding strategy was a way to be different from corporate brands. This strategy create brand equity for each property. Each hotel itself becomes a big brand, and thus the hotel logo becomes even profitable. The logo provides a profotable souvenir business by selling high-profile amenities such asa towels and bathrobes. In addition, in a highy competitive business environment it is much easier to launch an individual brands, if the…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ritz Carlton

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Ritz Carlton is known for one of the best when it comes to serving consumers with quality and luxury services. Now that the image of quality has been envisioned by many consumers, and other competitive hotel industries, the Ritz Carlton has to retrain all hotel staff to become more productive in all operations such as room services/delivery, guest reservations, quality message delivery services, and room service. Other business issues reflect from efficient and effective reservations for valet parking and adequate housekeeping services. The issues here are to examine to quantify quality to ensure the company meets all consumer needs, rooms are filled-with no deficiency, and remain on track to receive the award.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rosewood Case

    • 1981 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The problem the new president and CEO are facing is whether to switch to a corporate branding strategy or stick with the current individual property branding strategy. In fact the latter has been a very successful strategy for the company for the past 15 years. Nonetheless the top managers of Rosewood believe that as the luxury hotels market is becoming more and more crowded and competitive, the individual property branding strategy is actually limiting the potential number of customer the company can target since it doesn’t seem to be effective on the mass market. Therefore a change in the company strategy is required.…

    • 1981 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Recently “Susan Hodapp, brand director for Marriott Hotels, Resorts, and Suites, commissioned a survey to determine business travelers’ preferences for hotels and the factors that are important in their hotel selection process” (Malhotra, 2010, p. 518). The survey consisted of 5 factors, which are room décor, room lighting, voice and data access in the room, and price of the room per night. Each factor was placed on a 7-point scale with 1= not at all important and 7=extremely important (Malhotra, 2010, p.518). Taking this data into consideration it is important to know what type of analysis market researchers should conduct.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Superior responsiveness can be seen in their key account management incentive the company has in place. Marriott noticed that travel and entertainment expense is the third largest expense in corporations. This management incentive allows Marriott to focus on their potential customers and gain customer loyalty (Millman, 1996).…

    • 1151 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We believe that customer equity is an effective way to value this firm because the long-term profitability of Rosewood is closely related to customer loyalty. As an example, we performed a sensitivity analysis on Average Number of Visits per Year per Guest. If this number is reduced from 1.3 to 1.0 with Rosewood corporate branding, the CLV is reduced to $406. Consequently, market strategies that center on the brand are important to the hospitality industry.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays