New Deal politics and the Great Depression is a time in American history that is often misunderstood. Herbert Hoover is the president seen as allowing the depression to take over the country, where as Franklin Delano Roosevelt is seen as the president that effectively saved many Americans, and put an end to the Great Depression, but what is really true? Herbert Hoover accepted the Republican nomination for President of the United States in 1928. In 1929 Herbert Hoover became the 31st President, when he took office he was a proponent of something called the public-private cooperation. The term was known as ‘volunterism’. This idea would keep the government from intervening in economic policy. Hoover’s idea of America was individualism, and self-reliance. This kind of governing is called laissez-faire, and calls for the government to leave the economy alone. When the stock market crashed in the late 1920s, the nation could not ignore the depression that was sweeping the country, and most of Europe. This became known as the Great Depression. The Great Depression had devastating effect on countries rich and poor. While President Hoover was still in office he tried to put in place minimal programs, all of which failed to help the failing economy. Many were unhappy with Hoover’s way of handling the countries economic downfall, and put much of the blame on him. Hoovers hands off way of handling the Great Depression, lead to the election of Franklin D. Roosevelt. FDR as he came to be known as ran on the democratic ticket, and had much bigger ideas of how to handle the Great Depression. Franklin D. Roosevelt was the governor of New York, and came from a very rich family, and was also related to former Theodor Roosevelt. After FDR accepted the democratic nomination he set out to beat Herbert Hoover. He did so by blaming Hoover for the Great Depression, as most Americans were doing FDR was an appealing candidate for poor, struggling Americans because he made his constituents believe he cared. FDR also stood on a platform to end probation, and brought in a conservative running mate; John Nance Garner. When Roosevelt became president he set out to change the economic state of the country. His idea of how to help the nation was something called the New Deal. This was a series of programs that would focus on what historians would called the three R’s, relief, recovery, and reform. The New Deal came in phases, and the first phase was focused on the relief of people heavily affected by the Great Depression. Congress met for a special session in 1933, and was asked to pass multiple acts to help struggling Americans. FDR said in his Inauguration speech "This nation asks for action, and action now. Our greatest primary task is to put people to work. I am prepared under my constitutional duty to recommend the measures that a stricken nation in the midst of a stricken world may require.” And Roosevelt did just that, he pioneered the idea of getting as much as you can in the first 100 days of presidency, and this is now how most gauge the success the president might achieve. Since the nation felt that they were in a state of emergency congress was happy to give FDR the power to help, he had lots of acts past, and if they did not work he would try again. Almost immediately congress was called into a special session that was kept for three months. Democrats and Republicans alike were willing to bid for the President; they came together in the time of crisis to get as much accomplished as possible. With the quick passage of multiple bills, the federal government gained more and more power. The first act passed in the special session was the Emergency Banking Act, this would give the President powers over the banks and foreign exchange. This ended the Bank Holiday Roosevelt had implemented, it stopped all transactions for four days, banks were able to reopen when they could prove they could effectively do business. FDR then passes the Reforestation Relief Act, which started the Civilian Conservation Corps , this provided work for about 250,000 men ages 18-25. In the remaining time of 1933 Roosevelt passed about twelve more acts giving grants to states to provide relief for people needing jobs, and food. The acts were designed to help struggling Americans and help better the country as a whole, jobs were created by the government for men to work on railroads, construction, and other projects; they were receiving employment while helping the country. Agencies such as the Agricultural Adjustment Administration were to help regulate farm production and helped to raise farm income; where as the National Recovery Administration was to help regulate business by establishing fair codes of completion. There was government intervention in the economy, industry, and agriculture, and all was under executive control.
In the beginning of 1934 FDR asked congress for ten and a half billion dollars to continue recovery programs for the next 18 months. But after the first hundred days Roosevelt began to see opposition to the New Deal. Opposition to the NRA, an agency regulation business was made public when The Supreme Court, a conservative Supreme Court claimed that the NRA was giving the executive branch powers that belonged to Congress, and Congress only. The following year the court ruled that the Agricultural Adjustment Act was also unconstitutional, because aid for farms should be produced at a state level, not the federal. The Supreme Court heard many more cases on what came to be known as Alphabet Laws, and 11 out of 16 were pronounced to be unconstitutional. The argument was the FDR tried to imposes the powers of the federal government on to the state governments; if a state government wanted to declare that they had a farming crisis it was their right to handle it, not the federal governments.
With opposition from the Supreme Court the New Deal’s popularity dropped with some of the public, and was exploited by a senator from Louisiana, Huey Long. Long said that Roosevelt did not do enough to help the poor population, and came up with his own idea and called it “Share Our Wealth”. The program would take any personal fortune over $3 Million and distribute it to families in America, to buy a car, and a home. He also promised a national minimum wage, cheaper food for the poor, and an old age pension. Huey Longs idea’s were no more popular then the President’s, Long had to have body guards because of the amount of people that opposed his ideas. But before he could put his idea’s to the test Long was shot and killed in 1935, and it was highly unlikely he would have won the presidency. Long was certainly not the only one that opposed the president, Charles Coughlin was a catholic priest who attacked the president calling him the ‘anti-god’, he aligned himself with a man named Frances Townsend both wanted the government to pay, or give the less well off money. In 1936 the republican candidate was Alf Landon, the Governor of Kansas. Roosevelt still had the support of the country, and won the election with the greatest electoral landslide of all time. The voter was on the side of Roosevelt even if the critics were not.
After being elected for another term it looked as though the New Deal would have continued success, but Roosevelt had other challenges to face. In early 1937 Roosevelt was involved in the Court Packing scheme. He proposed a bill to allow the president to add another justice to the Supreme Court for every justice over the age of seventy. FDR claimed that the bill was needed to address the workload each justice had to take on, but it was more obviously proposed to weaken the power of conservative justices that were on the court at the time. The Supreme Court had previously not been supporting New Deal legislation, and this act made Roosevelt look weak, and desperate. The senate vetoed the decision and this became a blemish on Roosevelt’s otherwise clean record.
New Deal legislation began to slow down again in late 1937, when the country went through another, smaller depression, known as the ‘Roosevelt Depression’. It was a smaller depression but prolonged the span of the Great Depression, and with out New Deal legislation making a come back, Roosevelt took complete blame,
Because of New Deal legislation many American’s then and today believe that Roosevelt is a hero and the reason the Great Depression ended, but others believe that New Deal legislation was a failure, and that Roosevelt failed to pass legislation that truly ended the Depression, and helped his constituents. Two economists working out of UCLA believe that Roosevelt actually prolonged the depression. The two men argued that the programs Roosevelt signed into office were not helpful to Americans because they were ‘anti-competitive’ and did not allow people to rise and gain success because everyone was going to be paid the same amount and had typically similar jobs, from the government. The economist claim that had Roosevelt not implemented those policies that Great Depression would have ended faster, and with less hassle. Jim Powell of the Cato Institute would agree, he wrote an article “How FDR’s New Deal Harmed Millions of Poor People”. He explains that many people living in poverty were actually victims of New Deal Legislation. Powell denotes that most of the money that financed that New Deal came from tax dollars, house hold items, and everyday essentials were taxed and the funds were used to help rejuvenate the economy. The excise taxes that were being taken would primarily fall of the middle and lower class, the classes that need the most help during the Great Depression. Excises taxes also affected business, they would receive a higher business tax which in turn would leave them less money for growth and employment. Another point that Powell discusses about the New Deal is that money was funneled into ‘swing states’, states that Roosevelt did not have full support from; this meant that many programs did not reach to south. Powell explains that when American’s needed help with bargains, and saving money, they were asked to spend more on everyday items, food, and more.
Furthermore, Robert Higgs a writer for FEE.org says that if American’s understood what New Deal legislation really entailed that would have had good reason to not support FDR. Higgs agrees that FDR’s plans to help the economy, and bring wealth back to the country just prolonged the depression. The campaign promises that Roosevelt made in 1932 to balance the budget, and to cut federal spending could have helped the depression end in a timelier manner. Although Roosevelt made these campaign promises, he, his administration, and congress decided to go a different way with their new legislation. They embraced interventionist policies that caused a prolonged depression.
Not only does Higgs accuse FDR of prolonging the depression, he and other historians believe that the New Deal was a large vote buying scheme. Higgs states: “the Roosevelt administration recognized that the president and his Democratic allies in Congress could appropriate unprecedented sums of money and channel them into the hands of recipients who would respond by giving political support to their benefactors”. This means that the New Deal legislation was being used to gain political success, and continued success in office.
At this point in time these theories are just speculation, showing that Americans do not really know the ins and outs of what they are supporting. The way New Deal legislation was involved in everyday life for Americans changed the relationship between Americans and their government. But because of the invasiveness of some legislation people began to see the government as a means of employment or a provider. The New Deal ultimately brought relief to many Americans, but did not truly end the Depression. The end of the depression came with World War II. The war demanded the need for new government agencies, and the government’s need for private agencies went up. The government had to create new markets, so that they had the materials, and means to go to war. These new markets began to rejuvenate the economy, and bring the country out of the depression. The government used wartime polices to change what America produced, the investments the government made were able to lead the country out of the depression. Not only did the new markets help bring America out of the Great Depression, the millions of young men that went off to war were receiving full time employment that also help rejuvenate the economy. With new full time employees the government needed to provide living quarters, educational buildings, training facilities, and office buildings, this created a construction boom, effectively giving more people employment.
The Great Depression was a hard, and confusing time in American history. Then and today Franklin Delano Roosevelt is seen as a president that brought Americans out of some of its darkest days. New Deal legislation is not always understood by many Americans, but what Americans do know is that the New Deal helped bring millions out of poverty, ad help bring American back to the place they wanted to live.
Work Cited
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/fdr-s-policies-prolonged-depression-54
09.aspx
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/New_Deal_success.htm
http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/how-fdrs-new-deal-harmed-millions-poor-people
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-16/how-did-world-war-ii-end-the-great-depression-echoes.html
http://www.fee.org/the_freeman/detail/the-mythology-of-roosevelt-and-the-new-deal#axzz2T7GmCrKI
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal
http://teacherweb.ftl.pinecrest.edu/snyderd/US/New%20Deal/New%20Deal.htm
Cited: http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/fdr-s-policies-prolonged-depression-54 09.aspx http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/New_Deal_success.htm http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/how-fdrs-new-deal-harmed-millions-poor-people http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-16/how-did-world-war-ii-end-the-great-depression-echoes.html http://www.fee.org/the_freeman/detail/the-mythology-of-roosevelt-and-the-new-deal#axzz2T7GmCrKI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal http://teacherweb.ftl.pinecrest.edu/snyderd/US/New%20Deal/New%20Deal.htm
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
President Hoover believed “the Government should not support the people.” Hoover a self-made man, believed people should be able to support themselves, and make someone of themselves on their own, like he did. “Hoover on the other hand tells the working man to build homes, and in the face of the fact nearly every working man has had his home taken off of him” (doc 3). For quite some time, he simply refused to…
- 1035 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Great Depression of the 1930’s was the worst economic period in the history of the United States. Taking over the presidency in 1932, three years after the Depression began, Franklin Delano Roosevelt became responsible for leading America’s quest to escape the Depression. Roosevelt passed the New Deal in an attempt to help the nation recover through a series of initiatives focused on economic recovery. While most people would agree that the New Deal had a definite impact on the United States throughout the early-1930’s, there are some critics that think that the New Deal prolonged the Great Depression. These critics believe that different initiatives could have returned the United States to prosperity much sooner, and that the Depression would’ve continued much longer if not for the start of World War II.…
- 1990 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
When FDR was elected into office he was left with quite a mess left by Herbert Hoover, but Hoover had left a very nice foundation to start FDR’s famous “New Deal.” Programs during this time focused on trying very hard to help bring the US out of the Great Depression by…
- 1584 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Could whites and Indians have lived peaceably in the trans-Mississippi West? I do not think that the whites and Indians could have lived peacefully in the trans-Mississippi West. I believe this is because of the ways the Indians were living and hunting. Also with how the whites were not concerned with their customs and only had a one track mind on what they wanted of their land. The government “attempted” to keep peace by pressuring the Indians into treaties that were only broken and then new ones would be made. The government was not looking out for the tribes best interest either because they forced more restrictive agreements on the Indians which led to a war in the west between the whites and Indians. Looking back on the history, I think it was going to be the inevitable outcome of the situation. Even when some of the tribes would hold the American flag up to show friendship and white ones for truce, they were massacred and scalped of all types such as mothers, children and even babies by the whites. However the liquor and disease killed more Indians than combat did. Indian hunters themselves nearly wiped the plains clean by 1883 which weakened Indian resistance from working for commercial companies. Mines, crops and grazing herds and fences disturbed hunting and farming lands of many traditional tribes. Another treaty of 1868 was made but broken by Custer who was later killed by the Indians and nearly 250 soldiers in the summer of 1876. Congress adopted the Dawes Severalty Act in 1887 to end reservation goals but to have Indians join whites as farmers and small property owners of their land into the marketplace. That didn’t help though because Indians didn’t want to give up their tribal ways and also had no experience farming, managing money and other white ways. By 1890, the Indians had to adapt to life within the boundaries set by white culture despite their efforts at resistance. So the way I see it is there would not have been a peaceful way to live…
- 983 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The 1929 stock-market crash and the ensuing Great Depression exposed major weaknesses in the U.S. and world economies. These ranged from chronically low farm prices and uneven income distribution to trade barriers, a surplus of consumer goods, and a constricted money supply. As the crisis deepened, President Hoover struggled to respond. In 1932, with Hoover's reputation in tatters, FDR and his promised “New Deal" brought a surge of hope. Although FDR's New Deal did not end the Great Depression it eased the people’s suffering and reformed many of the problems that contributed to the depression by providing relief, recovery, and reform while fundamentally changing the role of the federal government towards the people.…
- 939 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Herbert Hoover was the 31st President of the U.S. from 1929-1933. Franklin Roosevelt was the 32nd President of the U.S. from 1933-1945. Policies of Hoover’s administration included The Norris-La Guardia Act and The Emergency Relief and Construction Act. Some policies of Roosevelt’s were the New Deal and the Lend Lease Policy. During Herbert Hoover’s presidency was the beginning of the worst economic fall in the history of the United States, “The Great Depression”. When Roosevelt took office, the depression was in its full swing and millions of people were unemployed. The comparison between Herbert Clark Hoover and Franklin Delano Roosevelt has its similarities and differences.…
- 1241 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1929, the United States Stock Market crashed, heralding the tumble into world-wide depression. President Hoover tried to pacify the people by telling them it was temporary and would pass over. But a new figure rose out of the people, promising he would do anything and everything he could to restore their lives. In 1932, Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected to the presidency, and his new policies would soon sweep over the country. Roosevelt's responses to the problems of the Great Depression were successful in strengthening the power of the federal government and instilling hope in the public, yet were unsuccessful in that they did not help him achieve his intended goal: the restoration of the economy. His responses were, however, radical in the way they made use of the power of the federal government.…
- 1337 Words
- 6 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
President Herbert Hoover, a Republican, had control of the United States from 1929 to 1933, the beginning of the economic downfall. Hoover created a laissez-faire government; the government was not involved in everyday business, instead it was a very hands off approach and daily life just took its path. When Franklin D. Roosevelt became president in 1933 the economy was now deep in a huge downward spiral, and he raised a new Democratic approach to run the government and United States. The United States was in for a lot of reform movements being that a Democrat was president, and something needed to be done to prevent the status of the United States to fail even more. Franklin D. Roosevelt responded to the problems of the Great Depression with an optimistic mindset. Roosevelt took the best approach he possibly could in order to preserve America. Clearly, Roosevelt’s responses such as, the New Deal, social security, development of the executive department and the Supreme Court were all effective in helping the Great Depression settle down. Every single thing that Franklin D. Roosevelt did as president has drastically changed the role of the federal government. As a Democrat entering a Republican’s past position, all of FDR’s new ideas were new and different for the government and United States.…
- 1172 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Due to the “hands off method” used by Herbert Hoover during the Great Depression, the president can be defined strongly as a conservative. By trying to restore the American economy, Hoover had to try profusely to keep the Unites States’ system from being “swept over” by the depression which had already happened to Europe (Doc D). During the depression, he wanted to restore the top of the economic pyramid by helping railroads, banks, and rural credit corporations and through “trickle down” economics, the bottom of the economic pyramid would fix itself as well. Because he applied a more business-oriented approach rather than a government approach, his plans were more conservative that liberal. Because Hoover believed that too much government involvement would destroy American individuality and self-reliance, which were to him important American values, he thought it was in the best interest of the nation to use less government in his policies (Doc A). Hoover drew the line at federal relief to individuals because he didn’t want federal…
- 761 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
It is commonly thought that President Herbert Hoover is a conservative. He believed in less government participation in the people's daily life. In his candidate speech, he renounced liberalism because it set bounds to the liberties of the people. He felt a great need to take government out of peoples lives [Doc A]. This is shown with his "hands off policy" during the depression. He believed in the business cycle and that the country would pull its self out of the depression. He did not want to use government power in dealing with this. In his message to Congress Hoover stated that the, "economic depression cannot be cured by legislative action or executive pronouncement." Hoover believed that all the government can do is encouraged the people to do what is best for their community. The government's only contribution was giving aid through programs - like waterways, harbor, and flood control - however only for a temporary time [Doc B]. He strongly believed that if the government kept giving money to solve problems, organizations and businesses would cease to help their community thus…
- 981 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Herbert Hoover and Franklin Roosevelt were both presidents during one of the most difficult times in American history, the Great Depression. To try and ease the hardships that many Americans were facing, each President developed many different programs. The different actions that each took to lessen the blow of the depression classified them as either a liberal or conservative. If their actions focused on helping the economy, they would be considered a conservative. If they were more focused on helping the lives of the American people, they would be classified as a liberal. Neither President can be labeled as strictly one. Although Franklin Roosevelt was commonly thought of as a liberal and Herbert Hoover a conservative, neither can be considered strictly one sided.…
- 639 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The delineations of the words "liberal" and "conservative" shifted at the start of the Great Depression. Although laissez-faire policy was thought to be liberal in the Roaring 20 's, the year 1929 quickly changed America 's idea of liberalism entirely. The hardnosed Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the saavy Herbert Hoover both believed they alone could improve America 's economic depression. Their political standings have been wholly analyzed, and although the two men did express ideas which were contradictory to their original political standpoints, one possessed more liberal ideas by wanting to change the government, versus more conservative ideas; wanting to keep the government as it was.…
- 869 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The stock market crash of 1929 marked a new era for the United States. The roaring twenties came to a screeching halt and many Americans faced absolute poverty in a country which was a beacon for hope, liberty, and wealth. Little was being done about this issue, especially by Herbert Hoover, the current president, whose "hands -off" approach to government did little to fix the dire situation Americans found themselves in. Though many Americans were deep into poverty, they still turned out to the polls and Franklin Roosevelt was elected president in 1932. The New Deal was a strategy of Roosevelt's to handle the problems of the depression, as he said in his own words, "Nor need we shrink from honestly facing conditions in our country today. This great Nation will endure as it has endured, will revive and will prosper. So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself...".# His strategy included relief for unemployed and poor Americans, economic recovery, and reform of the financial system.…
- 1189 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Franklin Roosevelt became President of the United States in 1933, the nation was in the depths of the worst depression it had ever experienced. President Roosevelt, a very energetic and enthusiastic person, inspired the people with his own confidence and faith in the future. He gathered a group of people sharing his views to help him, and provided food, clothing, and shelter for millions of unemployed and poverty-stricken Americans. This was part of what he called the New Deal, of which his three objectives were relief, recovery, and reform for American citizens. In another attempt at recovery, Congress attempted to revive the nation's agriculture and industry and place the economy on a solid foundation. They printed extra money to loan to industries that quickly paid it back. By 1933 nearly 14 million Americans were jobless. In response, the Roosevelt administration immediately launched what seemed at the time to be a wonderful program of direct relief.…
- 568 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The delineations of the words "liberal" and "conservative" shifted at the start of the Great Depression. Although laissez-faire policy was thought to be liberal in the Roaring 20's, the year 1929 quickly changed America's idea of liberalism entirely. The hardnosed Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the saavy Herbert Hoover both believed they alone could improve America's economic depression. Their political standings have been wholly analyzed, and although the two men did express ideas which were contradictory to their original political standpoints, one possessed more liberal ideas by wanting to change the government, versus more conservative ideas; wanting to keep the government as it was.…
- 261 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays