Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Homo Sapiens and the Great Apes

Best Essays
852 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Homo Sapiens and the Great Apes
Homo Sapiens and The Great Apes Imagine walking through the zoo and approaching the habitat of the great apes. Suddenly, you find yourself thinking about how different you are from these creatures. They can’t speak, they aren’t advanced, and don’t wear clothes. It is at this moment that you start to feel superior to these animals. Realizing this, you start to believe that you are in no way similar to these animals. This description is a common belief for most humans, the idea that we are in no way similar to the great apes. Though there are many biological and social differences between Homo Sapiens and the great apes, who are all members of the Hominoidea Infraorder, (a sub-classifaction of the primate order within the animal kingdom) there are also many similarities. When comparing Homo Sapiens and great apes, there is a lot to compare biologically. Humans differ from the great apes in a few ways. For instance, humans are bipedal (the ability to walk upright) while the great apes are quadrupedal (the ability to walk on all fours). Also, great apes have much more hair on their body, whereas Homo Sapiens have less hair. This allows Homo Sapiens to use sweat glands to regulate body temperature when running long distances, which was a direct result of bipedalism. Another way in which humans differ from the great apes is grip. Homo Sapiens have a much finer opposability in their thumbs, which allows for a finer pin point grip. The great apes have the ability for a pin point grip, but it’s not as evolved. The biological comparison also has many similarities. One example is the dental formula (the arrangement of teeth in a primate’s mouth). Both great apes and Homo Sapiens have a 2;1;2;3 dental formula. This means both have two incisors, one canine, two pre-molars, and three molars. This allows both species to partake in a varied diet. Another trait they share is forward facing eyes to allow depth perception. This is different than some other species that have eyes set on the lateral part of their skulls allowing them to watch out for predators. One more characteristic that the two species have in common is brain size. The great apes and Homo Sapiens have a much larger brain size compared to other primates, though Homo sapiens have a larger brain size to body ratio than other great apes. When comparing the great apes and Homo Sapiens, like the individual at the zoo, it is easy to recognize social differences in technology, material culture, and communication. But when observing the two species, one might notice the similarities. One similarity is the playful nature of both species. For example, both play chase with other members of the group, wrestle, and even have “tickle fights”. Affection is another social behavior they have in common. Both Homo Sapiens and chimps kiss and hug to show affection to one another. Also, both species groom each other. According to some primatologists, this behavior is used to strengthen social bonds within a troop of great apes. This behavior is also seen in Homo Sapiens, who, it could be argued, use grooming at times as a similar function. As stated above there are many differences as well as similarities between Homo Sapiens and the great apes. These similarities and differences consist of both biological traits and social behavior. Perhaps, the differences have to do with being a part of a different species, but they are similar because they are both part of the Hominoidea Infraorder. Along with the differences, when studying the similarities, perhaps one might recognize a fellow family member in the great ape house at the zoo.

Works Cited
Goodall, Jane. In the Shadow of Man. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1971. Print.
Larsen, Clark Spencer. Our Orgins Discovering Physical Anthropology. New York, London: W.W. Norton and Company, 2008. Print.
O’Neil, Dennis. “Humans.” Primates: The Taxonomy and General Characteristics of Prosimians,Monkeys, Apes, and Humans. Behavioral Sciences Department, Palomar College, 1998-2012. Web. 21 November 2012.

--------------------------------------------
[ 2 ]. Larsen, Clark Spencer. Our Orgins Discovering Physical Anthropology.( New York, London: W.W. Norton and Company, 2008). 168-9.
[ 3 ]. O’Neil, Dennis. “Humans.” Primates: The Taxonomy and General Characteristics of Prosimians,Monkeys, Apes, and Humans.Behavioral Sciences Department, Palomar College, 1998-2012.
[ 4 ]. O’Neil, Dennis. “Humans.” Primates: The Taxonomy and General Characteristics of Prosimians,Monkeys, Apes, and Humans.Behavioral Sciences Department, Palomar College, 1998-2012.
[ 5 ]. Larsen, Clark Spencer. Our Orgins Discovering Physical Anthropology.( New York, London: W.W. Norton and Company, 2008). 158
[ 6 ]. Larsen, Clark Spencer. Our Orgins Discovering Physical Anthropology.( New York, London: W.W. Norton and Company, 2008). 163
[ 7 ]. Larsen, Clark Spencer. Our Orgins Discovering Physical Anthropology.( New York, London: W.W. Norton and Company, 2008). 161
[ 8 ]. O’Neil, Dennis. “Humans.” Primates: The Taxonomy and General Characteristics of Prosimians,Monkeys, Apes, and Humans.Behavioral Sciences Department, Palomar College, 1998-2012.
[ 9 ]. Goodall, Jane. In the Shadow of Man. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1971). 117
[ 10 ]. Goodall, Jane. In the Shadow of Man. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1971). 222.

Cited: Goodall, Jane. In the Shadow of Man. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1971. Print. Larsen, Clark Spencer O’Neil, Dennis. “Humans.” Primates: The Taxonomy and General Characteristics of Prosimians,Monkeys, Apes, and Humans. Behavioral Sciences Department, Palomar College, 1998-2012. Web. 21 November 2012. [ 3 ]. O’Neil, Dennis. “Humans.” Primates: The Taxonomy and General Characteristics of Prosimians,Monkeys, Apes, and Humans.Behavioral Sciences Department, Palomar College, 1998-2012. [ 4 ]. O’Neil, Dennis. “Humans.” Primates: The Taxonomy and General Characteristics of Prosimians,Monkeys, Apes, and Humans.Behavioral Sciences Department, Palomar College, 1998-2012. [ 5 ]. Larsen, Clark Spencer. Our Orgins Discovering Physical Anthropology.( New York, London: W.W. Norton and Company, 2008). 158 [ 6 ] [ 7 ]. Larsen, Clark Spencer. Our Orgins Discovering Physical Anthropology.( New York, London: W.W. Norton and Company, 2008). 161 [ 8 ] [ 9 ]. Goodall, Jane. In the Shadow of Man. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1971). 117 [ 10 ]

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The bonobo is an in interesting species because it shares more than 98 percent of our genetic profile, which makes it very close to a human. It is believed that the human line of ancestry, along with the line of bonobo and chimpanzee, split about eight million years ago (http://songweaver.com). The bonobo is closely related to the chimpanzee but it is considered to be a different species (pygmy chimpanzee). When one looks at a bonobo, they may think that it looks a lot like a chimpanzee; however, if one takes a closer look, they will notice that the bonobo has longer legs, a higher forehead, and a different face shape (Relethford, Pg. 281). When it comes to the way of living, bonobos and chimpanzees differ as well. The bonobos…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Apes are one of the most sophisticated creatures on the face of the Earth. From their advanced means of communication to their ability to craft a variety of useful tools, these attributes not only let them thrive in a prehistoric humanistic way, but also rule the animal kingdom. Despite their rich intellect the general public see apes as nothing more than feeble-minded, rabid beasts, some not even able to distinguish the former from monkeys, who are distinctly different species. Scientists, on the other hand have been conducting extensive research to discover what factors can be attributed to ape’s intricate way of life. This is because of their superior anatomical, neurological, and psychological differences that set them apart from the…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The data collected in this experiment does match this for the most part. The Homo neanderthalensis did have the most similarities to the Homo sapien, with fourteen similarities followed by Australopithecus afarensis at eleven similarities, Australopithecus boisei at ten similarities, Homo erectus at eight similarities, Pan troglodytes at six similarities, and Gorilla gorilla with the least number of similarities; two. Obviously, some the order was a little mixed up, but it did generally follow the order evolution discovered by the scientists. According to scientists, the Gorilla gorilla should have been the second to least related to the Homo sapien out of the seven species tested. However, the data collected placed the Gorilla gorilla as the least related out of all of the species with only two morphological features in common with the Homo…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wrangham describes how humans have some different abilities than chimpanzees, although there are some positives there are also drawbacks. Humans have long legs and less arch in out feel enabling them to walk longer distances and better upright on the ground. Chimpanzees have shorter legs and more arched feet which makes them better tree climbers. Similarly, chimpanzees have much longer digestive tracts, which allows them to digest raw foods better than humans. Humans have evolved to use fire to their advantage and cook their food allowing them to digest it easier. Fire has allowed humans to increase their nutrient and caloric intake significantly.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Homo Neanderthals Essay

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In accordance to a new study, approximately around 13 million years ago, humans and chimpanzees shared their first common ancestor, based upon the genetic mutation rates for chimpanzees. Also, the chimpanzee and the human are distinctively similar due to the 98.8% shared DNA molecule. The bands on the chromosomes and bundles inside of DNA’s almost every cell, and the 1100 different genes are almost identical. With that being said, humans and chimpanzees are not the same, for 1.2% of 3 billion base parts show distinctions when interacting with the function for each gene. Such examples include the growth and development of intelligence for the human in comparison to the chimpanzee. (Museum of Natural…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    bipedalism

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While humans and primates are related in many ways, there are distinct characteristics for hominids. The most unique characteristic difference that separates hominids and non-human primates is bipedalism. While hominids walk on two feet, non-human primates are quadrupedal, using all fours to get around. Multiple experiments were conducted to identify between the advantages and disadvantages of being bipedal.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Genius

    • 862 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Watch the episode of the TV show Nova titled, Ape Genius. (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/beta/evolution/ape-genius.html click on Watch Ape Genius)…

    • 862 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Primates belong to the biological order “Primates” that include all species related to lemurs, monkeys, apes, and humans. Non-human primates are found all over the world, but are primarily centralized in Central and South America, Africa, and Southern Asia. Primates are divided into three main groups: prosimians, Old World and New World monkeys. Prosimians are the most ancestral extant primates and represent forms that were ancestral to monkeys, apes and humans. Old World monkeys are originally from Africa and Asia, while New World monkeys are unique to Central and South America. Interestingly, New World monkeys are believed to have migrated across the Atlantic Ocean to South America on a raft of vegetation similar to the pieces of floating mangrove trees that storms occasionally break off from the tropical African coast. Despite the morphological and behavioral differences between species of primates, there are a set of characteristics that generally define primates. All primates have a bony ring around the eye socket, hands and/or feet that have the ability to grasp, nails instead of claws on the end of the digits, a long gestation period, a slow post natal growth rate compared to maternal body size, large brain relative to body size, and binocular vision. Taken together, these characteristics define the living primates, and also provide the physical link between humans and our primate relatives (Fuentes, 2007).…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In a small world where human and apes are considered alike I would like to tell you the differences between. Apes and human are different in many ways, one of which being our way of thinking. Our way of living are considered very different. Our ways of transport seem to be a very unique way to get to a place then what the apes would prefer. And this defies the unique characteristics that keep man and ape separate from thinking alike.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Primate Evolution

    • 3741 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Complex behaviors and intelligence are the trademark of the primate order and this has been attributed in part to relative large brain to body mass ratio (Reader and Laland, 2002). Defining intelligence, however, is a highly problematic issue; an operational definition used points to the primary component of intelligence to flexible problem solving and the ability to cope with any difficult situations (Jerison, 1973). Arriving at an agreement for the driving factors favoring primate intelligence is very difficult. Many theories have been posed as selective mechanisms for the trends toward increased intelligence in primate evolution. Some emphasize complex ecological pressures, mainly foraging strategies as the primary forces driving an evolutionary increases in cognitive abilities, and other suggest that increased social complexity favored the evolution of primate intelligence (Tomasello and Call, 1997). Across the animal kingdom, brain size increases with increasing body size, however, despite the common scaling principle, brain size to body weight ratios differ from one taxonomic group to another (Jerison, 1973; Gould, 1975). In primates, for example, the brains of apes are generally larger relative to body weight than the brains of monkeys, whereas the brains of monkeys are larger than those of prosimians (Jerison, 1973). Structural differences are also apparent. In chimpanzees, a larger proportion of the brain is devoted to neocortex than in monkeys, who in turn have proportionately more neocortex than prosimians (Martin, 1990; Passingham, 1982).…

    • 3741 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Are Primates Clever

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Primates can be defined as the most developed order of mammals. All Primates are classified into one taxonomic order, which divides into two major suborders that differentiate physically from each other after taking different evolutionary lines. The lower primates prosimii commonly called prosimians, meaning "pre-monkey", was the first suborder to evolve and includes animals such as lemurs, lorises, etc.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bonobos

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Chimpanzees in comparison to us, is best listed on page 70. It reads, like humans, chimpanzees laugh, make up after a quarrel, support each other in times of trouble, medicate themselves with chemical and physical remedies, stop each other from eating poisonous foods, collaborate in the hunt, help each other over physical obstacles, raid neighboring groups, lose their tempers, get excited by dramatic weather, invent ways to show off, have family traditions and group traditions, make tools, devise plans, deceive, play tricks, grieve, and are cruel or kind.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apes and Language

    • 1987 Words
    • 8 Pages

    been thought possible. Just how far that resemblance extends, however, has been a matter of…

    • 1987 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    reflection in archaeology

    • 609 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ‘Hominid’ has now been assigned a broader meaning and now refers to all Great Apes and their ancestors. This new terminology is being used in many scientific journals already, and it is only a matter of time (but possibly many years) before everyone catches up to using the new term.…

    • 609 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Humans and Primates

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Humans and primates are similar in some ways, but they are different in others. As scientist remark, they belong to the same family called Hominidae. They also conclude that they have many similar characteristics because they went through a process that they called evolution. This is the process in which some primates evoluted into what is know a human being and preserved several similar characteristics. It is now known that the chimpanzee is the closest primate to humans since they have a similar protein sequence. Yet since they have a lot of differences, still they are considered non humans.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays