Preview

Homo Habilis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1438 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Homo Habilis
Homo Habilis
Hominids with a brain absolutely and relatively larger than that of the australopithecines appeared about 2.3 million years ago. These hominids are classified in our own genus: Homo. The earliest species to appear was the Homo Habilis. It was the first of our ancestors to show a significant increase in brain size and also the first to be found associated with stone tools. These characteristics resulted in this species’ placement into the human genus, Homo.
Discovery
The first fossil was found in 1960 when a team led by scientists Louis and Mary Leakey uncovered the fossilized remains of a unique early human at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania.
Because this early human had a combination of features different from those seen in Australopithecus, Louis Leakey, South African scientist Philip Tobias, and British scientist John Napier called these remains a new species: Homo habilis, meaning ‘handy man', because they suspected that it was this slightly larger-brained early human that made the thousands of stone tools also found at Olduvai Gorge.
Physical Features
Homo habilis had a larger brain than earlier human ancestors (Australopithecus) and this is reflected in significant changes to the shape of the skull. However, many other features including limb proportions are similar to those of the earlier australopithecine ancestors.
Body, size and shape: * Most of the body was covered by fur. * Body proportions were similar to those of australopithecines with females growing to about 117 (3,8 feet tall) centimeters and males to about 144 centimeters in height (4,7 feet tall). * They may have also been sexually dimorphic like the australopithecines, as individuals seem to have greatly differed in size.

Weight: * About 47 kg (103 pounds) in males and 34 kg in females (75 pounds). Brain: * Cranial capacity: 600-800 cc brain * The average was 630-640 cubic centimeters in size, representing 1.7 % of their body weight.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Cassowary can grow up to 2 metres tall and weigh up to 76 kilograms.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lb1 Research Paper

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This caused many skeptics to believe that this “hobbit” was an isolated incident of a modern human with some type of disease that stunted their growth. However, as more studies were completed, LB1 began to look more and more like other primitive, pre-erectus species. For example, LB1 had large feet, long, curved toes, and no arch. These type of feet would not be conducive to running long distances, and they would have to walk differently to keep their feet from dragging on the ground. LB1 also has a very small brain, similar in size to a chimpanzee. However, although LB1’s brain was extremely small, it still had some advanced features that allowed them to make stone tools and create fire. Other bones in the body, such as the wrist, pelvis, and clavicle, also appear more primitive than Homo erectus. However, many of the cranial features would make it appear that LB1 is a member of our genus. Due to the interesting mixture of characteristics, researchers have started to consider that the hobbit may actually have been a more primitive species, rather than one that evolved after Homo erectus. In the Journal of Human Evolution, Debbie Argue and her research team proposed two possible points in time at which the hobbit branched off from the rest of the hominins.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ardipithecus Ramidus

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ardipithecus ramidus weighed about 50 kg and stood about 120 cm tall (). In the circumstances of the other saved hominids of this particular species, this suggested small body size difference between both males and females (). Ardi's brain size was as small as those of the living chimpanzees with regard to their mobility and dietary adaptations (). The numerous saved teeth and enormous complete cranium revealed that Ardipithecus ramidus had a small face including a reduced canine/premolar complex ().…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7 million '' 10,000 B.C.E. |Fossil remains of near-human or proto-human creature known as Hominids…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From the moment humans were created to modern times, they made numerous physical and technological advancements. It started when the Australopithecines began displaying signs of bipedalism, freeing two arms for using tools and carrying food while walking at the same time. This was a significant physical change that the hominid species chose to make, as bipedalism was the gateway to hunting, farming, and harvesting. As time passed, the homo habilis began showing up. Their brain size was on a range between 550 and 687 cubic centimeters, whereas the Australopithecines had a brain size between 350 and 600 cubic centimeters, which meant that the homo habilis' brain capacity grew around 50%. This larger brain capacity led to the experimentation with…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Australopithecus- an extinct genus of small-brained, large-toothed bipedal hominids that live in Africa between one and four million years ago.…

    • 2340 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | * A creature belonging to the family Hominidae, which includes human and humanlike species. * Australopithecus genus evolved in eastern Africa…

    • 3704 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brain Size: Neanderthal people had a brain volume of about 1200 to 1800 cubic centimeters, equal to and even larger than modern human brains. Neanderthal skull reconstructions provide further evidence that they were a separate species to modern humans. Distinctive Neanderthal skull features were established in early infancy. Physical features in skull development, such as the Neanderthal’s receding chin and low, sloping forehead were fixed by the age of two years. Their hyoid bones, involved in speech, were basically identical to humans.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Methods in Evolutionary Anthro & Archaeology Early Hominins Homo erectus and Homo floresiensis Reading week - no class…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Neanderthals and modern humans have many similarities in appearance which include, but are not limited to, the size of the cranial capacity and shortened limbs. The cranial capacity of a Neanderthal varies from 1200 to 1750 cubic centimeters (O’Neil, 2010) with an average of 1400 cubic centimeters (Haviland, & Crawford, 2009) with a modern human varying between 900 to 1880 cubic centimeters (O’Neil, 2010) and an average of 1300 cubic centimeters (Haviland, & Crawford, 2009), respectively. It has been speculated that this was only because of the difference in size between Neanderthals and modern humans and when compared to those of similar size, a similar cranial capacity was present (Berger, 2010). Aside from similarities in cranial…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    she found fossilized parts of the upper teeth and skull of a hominid no one had recorded before, eroding out of an area near Bed I. In the next three weeks the Leakeys found more than 400 pieces to comprise an almost complete skull. It was not too different from remains found in South Africa by Raymond Dart in 1924 and by Robert Broom in 1936. (Those finds had not been accurately dated because of the way they were found and the lack of dating technology.) But the Leakeys thought their find different enough to constitute a new category of hominids, and called it Zinjanthropus boisei. They suggested that it lived 1.75 million years ago…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Becoming Human Worksheet

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How are the sizes of the parietal and temporal lobes of H. neanderthalensis different from that of H. sapiens? Why would it matter?…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since humans and other primates share a variety of characteristics, other primates provide important observations about early humans. Homologies between hominids and other primates enhance to behavior because the physiological and cognitive formations that manage to control human demeanor are likely related to those of other primates than to members of other taxonomic groups. The reality of this broad collection of homologous traits, the commodity of the average evolutionary history of the primates, means that nonhuman primates give beneficial examples for understanding the evolutionary ancestry of hominid morphology and for resolving the basis of human nature.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The earliest hominids have traits that include ability to walk upright as well as smaller teeth, flatter faces and larger brains than earlier primates. Hominid evolution began in in…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After 300,000 y.a. tools become more complex and are labeled in Europe as the Middle Paleolithic or in Africa, as the Middle Stone Age (Ambrose 2001). Regional variation is great enough that cultural traditions become evident. Tools composed of two or more materials that require complicated preparation become common and suggest increasingly complex brains. The tool tradition associated with the Neanderthals in western Europe is called the Mousterian (Klein 1999). All are eventually replaced by the blade industries of the Upper Paleolithic which are associated with modern humans. Encephalization, Language and Speech; brain sizes expressed as estimated cranial capacities are commonly reported for various species of hominin. Australopithecus afarensis and A. africanus have the smallest averages to date at 410 and 440 cubic centimeters (cc.), respectively (Collard & Wood 1999). Chimpanzee cranial capacity also averages 410 cc. But chimpanzees weigh about 24% more than the australopiths, thus complicating this simple comparison. The cranial volume of the robust hominins such as P. robustus and P. boisei were in the 500’s and H. habilis, H. rudolfensis and H. ergaster averaged 610, 750, 850 cc.,…

    • 3142 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays