Preview

Homework

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2443 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Homework
Medina, Karen E. November 15, 2013
IS1133 Prof. Liggayu
Homework

1. Definition of Foreign Policy.
a. Foreign Policy is the use of political influence in order to induce other states to exercise their law-making power in a manner desired by the states concerned: it is an interaction between forces originating outside the country’s borders and those working within them
2. Patterns and Elements of Foreign Policy.
a. In the search for identifiable patterns, the field of foreign policy analysis rejects the view that every event is completely unique. Finding patterns is important to reach the end goal of a general understanding and an increased capability for prediction. In other words, we seek to explain the factors that influence not just a specific policy, but state behavior generally because general knowledge can be used to anticipate future action. If we know the factors that shape decisions for war, we are better able to predict, control, and possibly even prevent future international conflicts.

This is not to say that we assume all states' foreign policies can be explained in exactly the same way. In order to discover similarities and differences across foreign policies. We use the COMPARATIVE METHOD. This comparative method involves selecting what to examine and determining patterns. It is "comparative" because it involves comparing two or more states or in some cases, one state at different periods to determine similarities and differences.
3. Principles in Foreign Policy
a. Communicate with everyone. And “everyone” means just that: everyone. Be inclusive. It doesn’t always have to be the President or Secretary of State that does the talking. If it is the rebel band such as the Contras or Al Qaeda, don’t be afraid to talk. All right; for such rebellious troublemakers you send a lower level ambassador like a Jesse Jackson. But talk with them and listen. You may be able to avoid a serious escalation of their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Select a wellknown international political event that has impacted the United States foreign policy. For example, the 9/11 attacks on the U.S., Iraq, China, or Japan that would be good events for this and the following assignments. You will be using the same event for all writing assignments in the course, so read through the descriptions of Assignments 2, 3, and 4 to make sure your event can be applied in all four (4) assignments. Write a 67 page paper in which you 1.Briefly describe the event you have chosen. 2.Identify the political actors and nonstate actors and explain how each are or were involved. 3.Explain the major factors affecting foreign policy decisions and international relations (influences at three (3) levels). 4.Using the theories of international politics, perform a level of analysis for each paradigm. 5.Research and cite at least three (3) peerreviewed academic sources. Your assignment must…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    resolute foreign policy that does not allow the U.S. to get too entangled while at the…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cold War Dbq Analysis

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For instance, the strategic position of countries has been behind foreign policy decisions taken by the United States. Let’s go back to the Cold War, when tensions between NATO and the USSR where incredibly strong and the world was threatened by a nuclear-bomb war. During this period of time, the United States was part of a group of western allies called the NATO, which was supposedly interested only in winning the war against communism. To win the war both the NATO and the USSR established military bases near both Russia and The United States. Even thought NATOS’s interest was only winning the war, the United States’ wasn’t. The United States had national defense interests for resource possession, especially ones with great significance or uniqueness for the Cold War.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DeConde, A., Burns, R. D., Logevall, F., & Ketz, L. B. (Eds.). (2002). Encyclopedia of American foreign policy (2nd ed.) (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Scribner 's.O’Malley, M. (1999)…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Papp, Daniel S., Loch K. Johnson, and John E. Endicott. American Foreign Policy: History, Politics, and Policy. New York: Pearson Longman, 2005. Print.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Homework

    • 450 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Appendix D JavaScript Objects Read the directions carefully and write JavaScript code that addresses the requirements. Copy your code directly into the appendix document and post your assignment. Write a line of code using the Location object to return the uniform resource locator (URL) of a web page to a variable called myWebPage. Write a line of code using the Navigator object to return the web browser name to a variable called myBrowserName. Write a line of code using the Screen object to return the height of the display screen, not including operating system features such as the Microsoft Windows Taskbar, to a variable called myScreenHeight. Write a line of JavaScript code using the Windows object and other properties to open a new web browser window with the Google home page displaying and no menu bar. html head script…

    • 450 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    War Powers Act of 1973

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The United States of America holds the position in the world as a nation in which foreign policy is focused and debated as a matter of embittered public outrage and controversy. This is the reality not only among the party in office and their equivalent opponents but mainly within the very party themselves. It is much truer within the party that is controlling the executive branch. This criticism thrown at foreign policy is not that evil. It is a well meaning constructive criticism that tells the incoherence of policies passed by the executive branch. However, the fault is not likely coming from a flawed national character or among the attitudes of the leaders but the circumstances that surround it. Such circumstances comprise an increasing external challenge coupled with congressionally mandated restraints on the executive branch. The combination of both provides a dangerous whipsaw that can render American foreign policy as ineffective.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us Wars

    • 4433 Words
    • 18 Pages

    U.S. supports foreign policy decisions when it is restraining a nation rather than regime change, mainly because we are casualty averse.…

    • 4433 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Historical analogies are a variety of analogy often used by politicians and diplomats to explain or make a prediction about a current or future event based on ideas or events in the past. The past event is used as a source, while the present or future situation is the target of the analogy. Reasoning by historical analogy has played a significant role in the formulation and implementation of US foreign policy since the end of World War II, especially on matters involving consideration or actual use of force. States, like individuals, make decisions based at least in part on past experience, or, more specifically, what they believe past experience teaches. During the activities of the Persian Gulf War in 1990 and 1991, President George H. W. Bush, Sr. and Senator John Kerry used historical analogy to predict the upcoming events and future assessments of the crisis in the Persian Gulf. Using the successful and not so successful lessons learned from the Vietnam War and situations prior to that as background, Bush and Kerry apply knowledge of the past to asses and justify their positions.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Many presidents of the United States of America have constructed doctrines during their terms in office that have come to define their foreign policy aims, from James Monroe in 1823 right up until the very recent Bush Doctrine. This essay will focus on three of these doctrines, namely the Monroe Doctrine of 1823, the Truman Doctrine of 1947 and the Reagan Doctrine of 1984. Although there are many other presidential doctrines in the history of American foreign policy, several of these, such as Polk’s doctrine in 1845 and the Eisenhower Doctrine of 1957, appear to simply be reiterations of previous presidential doctrines. We will see that, although rhetoric is used quite freely in the president’s announcements of their doctrines, it would be wide of the mark to argue that the doctrines themselves are merely rhetoric. Instead should become clear that the doctrines shaped American foreign policy not only during the doctrine’s author’s term in office, but also for many of his successors.…

    • 4124 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    President and Congress

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The first views foreign policy as "those external goals for which the nation is prepared to commit its resources" By focusing on what a country does rather than what it says, this pragmatic definition usefully separates a country's rhetoric from its true intent and its material capabilities. However, lack of action can also constitute a policy-the policy of an isolationist state is defined by its very unwillingness to commit resources. A second conceptualization of foreign policy is as "the range of actions taken by varying sections of the government of a state in its relations with other bodies similarly acting on the international stage...in order to advance the national interest". Notable here is the recognition that governments do not act as monolithic, static entities, and that non-state actors may at times be as influential as states. However, the assumption that governments always know what is in the "national interest" and always rationally work towards its realization is debatable. For the purposes of this…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United States foreign policy has always been characterized by a commitment to free trade, protection of American interests, and a concern for human rights. Our founding fathers, specifically George Washington, are responsible for much of the influence regarding foreign policy after their time period and up to the present day. Washington, in his Farewell Address, warned the country to stay out of permanent foreign entanglements and to stay neutral. The United States stayed faithful to Washington’s warnings for about 125 years. But, when the age of Imperialism hit, the country was forced to intervene to prevent other countries from rising up and becoming world powers. The atrocities of imperialism caused something that America will always regret; The First World War. After the war, the United States’ foreign policy changed from all out intervention to almost complete isolation, similar to what George Washington suggested. After the Second World War, American foreign policy back once again to intervention to try and make the world a better and more peaceful place. In comparison, each foreign policy have nearly no similarities, but a wealth of differences.…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roosevelt and Isolationism

    • 5742 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Carroll, John M. and George C. Herring, eds. Modern American Diplomacy. Delaware: Scholarly Resources Inc., 1984.…

    • 5742 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 2 ]. Walker, J. Samuel. Prompt & Utter Destruction, The University of North Carolina Press. 1997,2004. Pg. 38…

    • 2152 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kenneth N. Waltz is a structural realist who subscribes to “defensive realism”, which argues that states aim to amass as much power as possible because they want to be assured security in the international arena (Lamy and Masker, p.75). His perspective on international relations further explains that states do this through a “self-help system” where states, distrustful of others, conclude that they can only rely on themselves to defend against external threats. They act prioritizing national interests over global ones (Waltz 1986, p.101-102). This insecurity that underscores how states conduct themselves in international relations inadvertently provokes other states to react similarly, resulting in a security dilemma that is likely to breed…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays