Preview

Holberg & Company Case Brief Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
652 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Holberg & Company Case Brief Summary
Holberg & Company, the defendant, had a working business agreement with Citizens National Assurance Company (CNAC), the plaintiff. Owned and operated by Robert E. Holberg, Holberg & Co. is an unincorporated sole proprietorship. Holberg seeked out clients to sell insurance through CNAC for which he collected commission on the sale. To establish this practice between the two companies, CNAC drafted a contract detailing the appropriate conduct, commission rates, etc.
During a transaction, CNAC observed that Holberg had breached the contract and as a result decided to sue. CNAC and Holberg presented the contract between them to the trial court of Houston, Texas. CNAC pointed out the provision Holberg had breached, and though Holberg attempted to refute the claims, it was clear and apparent the contract had been violated. After careful review by the trial court, the judge awarded CNAC $94,304.79 as well as the additional expenditures accumulated as a result of the trial.
The initial decision dealt with just the two companies, excluding Holberg individually. Before the case was closed, while motions could still be placed into action, the plaintiff requested to modify the
…show more content…
Article 6135 states that “In suits by or against unincorporated companies, whatever judgment shall be rendered shall be as conclusive on the individual stockholders and members thereof as if they were individually parties to such suits.” This information itself revealed that the trial court was justified in its decision. Article 6137 further enhanced the argument in stating: "service of citation may also be had on any and all of the stockholders ... and [judgment] shall be equally binding upon the individual property of the stockholders…" Both of the supporting articles set precedence that reinforced the argument that Holberg, as the sole stockholder, was bound by the judgment of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Facts: Darlene Jespersen was a bartender at Harrah’s Casino in Reno in the sports bar. She was frequently praised by her supervisors and customers for being an outstanding employee. When Jespersen first started her job at Harrah’s the female bartenders were not required to wear makeup but were encouraged to. Jespersen tried to wear makeup to work a few times but decided that she did not like it due to the fact it made her feel sick, degraded, exposed and violated. She also believed that it interfered with her ability to deal with unruly customers because it “took away [her] credibility…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dave Sharland – Mr. Sharland a physical therapist for the North Florida/South Georgia Veteran’s Administration (VA) reported that during his career, he has participated in over 800 physical therapy visits in home settings and been very positive. The Council questioned Mr. Sharland on licensure requirements, technical platform, types of services offered, and patient and patient representative access to services. Mr. Sharland to explain the health care providers working with the VA are only required to obtain a license in one state, but they are limited to providing services to only VA patients. He noted that that necessary technology is sometimes provided directly to patients and that in other instances the patient is responsible for purchasing…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief No 1

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Facts: In year 2000, Narnia Investments, Ltd. sued Harvestons Securities, Inc. and several defendants in trial court of Texas. The trial court then granted a default judgment against Harvestons and in favor of Narnia that Harvestons has to pay $365,000, plus attorney’s fees, prejudgment interest, and postjudgment interest. Harvestons claimed that it had no actual knowledge of the pending litigation before November 15, 2004 and filed a timely restricted appeal. Harvestons contends that the service of process was defective due to the process was delivered to someone different than the one name in the citation, the person to which the process was delivered, JoAnn Kocerek, did not have a authority to accept the process on behalf of Harvestons or the Texas Securities Commissioner and the return of service does not show a valid manner of service. At last, the appellate court of Texas reverse the trial court’s default judgment and remand this case for further proceedings.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plaintiff, Margaret Hollar was not employed at the time of the accident in question. The plaintiff had a history of having an L4-S1 discectomy and laminectomy. Ms. Hollar testified that she had a history of severe headaches, which began when she was 20 years of age. The plaintiff was involved in an accident in 2001 in which she slipped on ice and injured her neck and back. That injury led to her back surgery, as a result of her chronic back pain she was unable to return to work. The plaintiff has a history of severe depression and anxiety and inpatient psychiatric treatment.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS Rumarson Technologies, Inc. (RTI) sued Robert and Percy Helmer to collect from them personally $24,965 owed to it by Event Marketing, Inc. (EMI) when EMI's check to pay RTI bounced. Robert and Percy Helmer were authorized signatories on EMI's corporate account, and they signed the check. RTI argued that as signatories they could be held personally liable. The lower court agreed and ruled in favor of RTI holding the Helmers liable. The Helmers appealed. Also of note, is that check was dated 1998 although there is some non-material dispute as to whether it was August 14, 1998, or on or around July 13, 1998.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief - R. v. Hufsky

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Spot check was for the purposes of checking licenses, insurance, mechanical fitness of cars sobriety of the drivers.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Describe clearly the accounting changes Harnischfeger made in 1984 as stated in Note 2 of its financial statements…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In establishing Drexel University, Philadelphia lender and altruist Anthony J. Drexel dispatched a convention of development.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Traco vs Arrow

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Appellant initially argues that the trial court erred in rendering judgment for Arrow because Traco's bid was revocable and properly withdrawn thirty days after it was made.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This case is about Robert Allen who was trying to sell Bayfield a Drive system to work with a shearing line that they had recently purchased from Mangna Machinery. Allen lost the sale and was reviewing his call reports to see where he went wrong. The Exhibits shows that Allen did certain thing right, and he could’ve done more to keep the sale and to seal the deal so to speak. According to the text Allen built a good relationship with the engineers and the decision makers at the plant. He also contacted Magna and got the specifications for the shearing line, which was good move so they can tailor a custom system to better fit the shearling line. However, could’ve used that contact at Magna and involved them more in the process. Perhaps build and alliance with them and have them declare Lawford as a preferred partner.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Incremental cost on alternative 1 (Sell steel rings which are already in inventory and do not produce steel rings.)…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Plaintiff, Stambovsky, sued to have the contract canceled. The trial court ruled in favor of Ackley.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The facts disclosed that in 1954, Mr. Lee had formed the respondent company carrying on…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case is remarkable for the following reason: that the parties entered into a stipulation in which the defendants…

    • 2717 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plaintiff prayed to the court for an injunction to restrain the second defendant from continuing to take part in the management of the company and that the transfer to Ho Kum Chen, and subsequently to the first defendant was void because it did not comply with art 34A of the company's articles of association.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays