Preview

Hitler's Appeasement To Germany Before World War II

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
731 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hitler's Appeasement To Germany Before World War II
Before WWII stretches from Europe till the Pacific Ocean. Germany, (the most notorious country that caused the most damage) was enraged about the Treaty of Versailles that limited their power of their government. As a result, a man by the name of Adolf Hitler, promised to destroy the Treaty of Versailles, and to restore Germany to its rightful state in Europe. While the rest of Europe and the world, is aware of Germany attempt rebuild itself and invasion among countries. Their only solution to this conflict was to issue appeasement. A temporary truce that allows a person to received what’s requested, before an even greater conflict emerged. Issuing appeasement to Germany multiple times, it was considered useless. Since Adolf Hitler, would still invade countries among it border, even though he’s only allowed to have a portion of it. Meaning, that Appeasement was only an excuse to escape conflict with the German. And is only a cowardly move, which resulted to a war in 1937. …show more content…
Meet together about Germany capability to expand territory. Going against the Treaty of Versailles, Chamberlain issues an appeasement and allows Hitler to expand under certain conditions. Agreed upon these term, Hitler promise not to invade Britain during a time of truce. However, while only suppose to take part of a country land, he instead took all of it. Causing to break the appeasement and resulted Chamberlain to do nothing about it. As Chamberlain only intention in conference with Hitler, is to create peace between the two country. Not to increased the conflict between the two and create a war. While Britain sacrifice multiple countries, in order to save their nation. It would have been morally wrong to do so. But it was the safest option for Europe not to get involved into

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    German Aggression Dbq

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Within two years of consolidating power over Germany, Hitler and the Nazi Party had commenced operations to reverse the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles which had treated the German people in an unfair manner. Among these reversals included foreign diplomatic measures which would ensure that Germany would annex the territories it had lost at the conclusion of World War One. In September of 1938, with Europe on the brink of yet another major war, Great Britain’s Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain called the four powers – Germany, Italy, France, and Great Britain – to convene in Munich and address German aggression against Czechoslovakia and the Sudetenland. Among Neville Chamberlain’s goals for the conference was the notion to avoid…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ 19

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1939 the world was plunged into World War II because of the Munich Agreement. The Munich Agreement was an agreement regarding the Sudetenland Crisis between the major powers of Europe after a conference held in Munich in Germany in 1938. The Sudetenland was an important region of Czechoslovakia. The Treaty of Versailles was the peace treaty created as a result of six months of negotiations at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, which put an official end to World War I between the Allies and Central Powers. The Munich Agreement caused many disagreements between European countries. Collective security was a more effective response to aggression than appeasement because more European countries disagreed than agreed with the decision made during the Munich Conference for various reasons and Germany had many ways of keeping its territories under control.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intimidation from Fascist leaders was a factor that led to the illogical events of World War II. Adolf Hitler, chancellor of Germany, justified his barbaric actions on his attempt to benefit the "superior" German race. The effects of his ambitions were displayed during the Munich Conference in 1938. Hitler invited the Prime Minister of Britain and the Premier of France and demanded that the Sudetenland become part of Germany. Due to France and Britain's fear of another war, Hitler's demand was accepted. The appeasement, or agreement in order to maintain peace, at the Munich Conference was said to have "saved Europe from a world war," as stated by William Shirer. Contrary to Shirer, Europe would still be involved in war and things would only get worse.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II DBQ

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the early 1920s, as World War I ended, nations looked for peace as an outlet and hope for the future. As time passed, most countries were happy that the Great War had ended, however they were upset with the outcome. Since there were many costly expenses from the war, it caused many of the hostile nations to look for strong rulers for change. This allowed many harsh dictators to rise to power. These dictators were aggressive rulers and took forceful actions. In order to combat these aggressive rulers, other nations tried to resist war and give in to their demands. This type of action was known as appeasement. Not all countries felt the same way about this response; other countries believed that a collective security would work better.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Munich agreement encouraged Hitler to take more land and spread militarism. Neville Chamberlain should have stopped Hitler in his tracks, and gathered Allies to defend Poland, as well…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After World War I created instability with in Europe the stage was being set for another world war that would follow a mere two decades later. Germany was both unstable politically and economically and with the help of Hitler they were determined to get back on their feet. Hitler began rearming the country and signed strategic treaties with Italy and Japan in order to gain more ground on his goal of world domination. Hitler invaded Poland in September of 1939 and as a result Great Britain and France were inclined to declared war on Germany. World War II…

    • 2536 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    France and UK came up with the policy of appeasement which was a policy with nazi germany that would allow hitler to take a lot more land than he was supposed to. The reason being is the policy was put into place so that the UK and france would let Hitler do what he wanted as long as he didnt do what they told him not to do. The policy of appeasement however did not work because Hitler was not someone you could appease. Once Hitler invaded poland the policy ended thus ending the reign of letting hitler walk all over…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obama VS Chamberlain

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When Chamberlain went to Munich on September 29th, 1938, to ask Hitler to discontinue, as he would have said, his plans to take over Poland, Chamberlain had good intention, but bad execution. He claimed that the appeasement was for, "The peace of our time," and that his agreement with Hitler, that which Hitler publically disregarded 7 days later, would allow Europe to continue war-free, sparing it from the trauma and anxiety associated with war. It is well known that Chamberlain failed utterly to accomplish anything with the appeasement, and war did in fact break out the following year. Recently, President Obama went to Geneva to negotiate peace terms with Iran regarding them physically possessing nuclear weapons, and failed to accomplish anything. In fact, Iran slapped America in the face by completely undermining America's request, and this is the cause for much controversy and ill feelings toward Obama as of late.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. This statement is quite accurate in many ways. This time in history, where Hitler was gaining power he could be related to a child. The reasons he can be consider a child, because he is like a kid who is pushing his limits. Great Britain's and France's appeasement only makes it worse. When a child breaks a rule and they are punished to keep them from doing it again. With Hitler, he kept breaking treaties and known one would do anything, so he kept pushing his limits. Eventually someone decides to do something and it was too late and Hitler had rebuilt German. A main example to this statement is when Hitler declares that Germany will not follow the treaty of Versailles. He then begins to build up Germany’s army again with no one trying to stop him.(p.860). Hitler continued these types of actions all the way up to World War 2.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The First World War ended in an Allied victory, but the economies of Britain and France were shattered. In order to rebuild their economies, they had to disarm rapidly. The First World War had also given rise to strong anti-war sentiments, especially in Britain and France. Germany, who was blamed entirely for the outbreak of the First World War, received harsh reparations and was forced to sign the unfair Treaty of Versailles, which made Germany lose territory, as well as limited her armaments. This sparked resentment in the Germans who felt injustice that the war was entirely blamed on them which was prominently evident in Adolf Hitler who rose to power as Fuhrer of Germany in 1933. The highly nationalistic Nazi leader came into power a goal: to make secure and to preserve the racial community and to enlarge it. He hated the Versailles settlement and wanted to destroy it, hence fore building up the army and recovering lost territories to preserve German race. Therefore the in contrast to the Allies, Germany under Adolf Hitler was aggressive and influenced by revisionism. In attempt to preserve peace and not start a war with Germany, Britain and France, the two great powers gave in to Germany instead of standing against the aggressive Hitler. Appeasement is a term often applied to the overly acquiescent foreign policy practiced by Neville Chamberlain when dealing with Hitler’s Nazi regime. However, instead of preserving peace that Britain and France desperately wanted, it ironically allowed Hitler who did not have concrete plans on how to achieve his goals, to exploit their weakness and used situations in his advantage, which then resulted in the Second World War. While some may agree to this stand, others argue that Hitler intended a major war right from the beginning as seen from his book Mein Kampf and later on…

    • 2372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Initially Hitler uses the restrictions placed under the Treaty of Versailles as a litmus test for European aggression towards Germany, repeatedly and deliberately breaking them to gauge any negative response. Occupying the Rhineland, increasing the size of the standing army, and interest in retaking the Sudetenland all became examples of the exploitation of a policy of appeasement within Western European powers opposed to the idea of another World War. As a result of this appeasement policy the Munich Agreement was signed, providing Germany with the Sudetenland officially but limiting further expansion. This too was broken by Hitler and Nazi Germany as he authorizes the reoccupation of the entirety of Czechoslovakia and invades Poland. With this military act, Hitler forces the hand of Britain and France who declare war on the country, thus ending the…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The decades following World War I consisted of European leadership averting conflicts that could lead to large-scale war. Accordingly, this concept was easily achieved prior to 1933 due to European leadership in countries of military might striving for peace in Europe. Following Adolf Hitler’s rise to power in 1933, Germany disregarded the provisions of the Versailles treaty without challenge. Germany re-occupied the Rhineland in 1936 and annexed Austria in the spring of 1938 without confrontation, German then demanded that Czechoslovakia turns over the Sudetenland in the late summer of 1938. The British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, engaged Adolf Hitler at the Munich Conference in an attempt to de-escalate the situation, which…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before War World II Europe and Germany didn’t have the best relations, but they got along, that was until Hitler invaded Poland. Prior to the invasion of Poland, Hitler had won the support of Germany by promising that he would get them out of their economic depression. Soon after becoming chancellor of Germany, Hitler went back on his word. He did not doing anything he claimed…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain gave this speech to the House of Commons on September 1st, 1939, hours after Hitler's troops had invaded Poland. Chamberlain and others had spent years negotiating with Hitler in order to prevent another war in Europe. The point of this speech is too inform people of what Hitler has done and of what the British response will be.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Appeasement was the right policy for England in 1938. This is because It was based on the idea that what Hitler wanted was reasonable and, when his reasonable demands had been satisfied, he would stop. Appeasement was the only practical action that could be held during that time. England and France were not ready to get into another war. They already had severe damages that they couldn’t afford to get into another war. This gave them time to prepare for war since it is inevitable anyways. It also gave them time to prepare for old and broken equipment. Alliances needed to be made and through this, that was all possible. Also, through this policy, they were able to get public support. Appeasement also allowed Britain time to retool factories for war. Many Britons during that time saw Hitler as a defence against Russian Communism. This all happened because they thought that Hitler would soon be satisfied after remilitarizing the Rhineland, annexation of Austria and czechoslovakia. Wanted to please Hitler this way. The empire was already overstretched and its financial resources quite limited. The U.S. was isolationist. Soviet communism was feared, France was weak. This was all done to prevent war and preventing war is something needed to be done. Their objective was for the collaboration of all nations in building up a lasting peace for Europe. The Czechs, left themselves and told they were going to get no help from the Western Powers, would have been able to make better terms than they have got. This also gave the greatest chance of securing protection for the country. Czechoslovak State would’ve not been able to be an independent entity without this. Chamberlain remembered the slaughter of the…

    • 2172 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays