History of Zimbabwean Law
The Zimbabwean law came from a long way to be what it is today. The long road which led to the current law had milestones of changing times, governance, wars which fought and exploration among others. This writing is aimed at outlining the historical development of blended Zimbabwe’s current law by chronologically tracing all the developments from its origins up to post colonial era.
The birth of Zimbabwean law can be traced from the fall of Roman in AD 476. The decline of Roman Empire did not bring the existence of Roman law to an end as indicated by Christie (1998). During those middle ages, the Roman law existed because every person was judged according to the laws of his or her own tribe or country which made the former Roman citizens to be judged according to the Roman Law. The Roman Law was regarded as the main law in Europe, but the Dutch in Netherlands did not receive it completely. The independence of Dutch people from Rome made them preserve their customs and privileges. The law that came out showed much Dutch influence in certain areas like families. The Roman law was received in Netherlands in the 15th and 16th centuries and became mixed with customary law to form Roman-Dutch Law. Grotius (1583-1645) was described as the father of roman Dutch law because of his first attempt to write a systematic roman Dutch Law.
The step which brought the Roman Dutch law to Southern part of Africa was when Jan Van Riebeek brought the roman Dutch Law to Cape in 1652 as highlighted by Christie (1998). Riebeek occupied the Cape as one of the loyal agents of the Netherlands companies from the Province of Holland. He took the law of Holland with him which granted the company as to be a separate entity from its members. The British took advantage of Dutch alliance the Netherlands and took over control of the cape in 1814. The British did not replace the working legal system in the cape but they established a system of courts on the English pattern to replace existing
The birth of Zimbabwean law can be traced from the fall of Roman in AD 476. The decline of Roman Empire did not bring the existence of Roman law to an end as indicated by Christie (1998). During those middle ages, the Roman law existed because every person was judged according to the laws of his or her own tribe or country which made the former Roman citizens to be judged according to the Roman Law. The Roman Law was regarded as the main law in Europe, but the Dutch in Netherlands did not receive it completely. The independence of Dutch people from Rome made them preserve their customs and privileges. The law that came out showed much Dutch influence in certain areas like families. The Roman law was received in Netherlands in the 15th and 16th centuries and became mixed with customary law to form Roman-Dutch Law. Grotius (1583-1645) was described as the father of roman Dutch law because of his first attempt to write a systematic roman Dutch Law.
The step which brought the Roman Dutch law to Southern part of Africa was when Jan Van Riebeek brought the roman Dutch Law to Cape in 1652 as highlighted by Christie (1998). Riebeek occupied the Cape as one of the loyal agents of the Netherlands companies from the Province of Holland. He took the law of Holland with him which granted the company as to be a separate entity from its members. The British took advantage of Dutch alliance the Netherlands and took over control of the cape in 1814. The British did not replace the working legal system in the cape but they established a system of courts on the English pattern to replace existing
References: Christie, R.H. (1998) Business Law in Zimbabwe, Cape Town: Juta and Co, Ltd. Nkomo, J. (1984) The Story of my Life, London: The Chaucer Press.