High Mass Star Compare And Contrast

Before a star even becomes a star, scientists are tracking its every move and every phase it goes through. Scientists do this for high mass and low mass stars because they both go through similar life cycles. The difference? A high mass star burns out in just a few million years while a low mass star could take almost ten billion years to burn out. HIgh mass stars develop much quicker because of their massive core, which is how they get their name. A high mass star will start growing in a nebula then just grow more and more from there, and impact our Universe the more and more it grows.
Since the high mass star has a larger mass it will burn up its fuel quicker, which results in a shorter life span. But before it can burn up it has to start somewhere, and it starts with gravity and hydrogen. Gravity will start to collect hydrogen, it will then start to turn into a cloud and spin until it becomes a protostar. Next a fusion reaction happens, this will occur when the density and temperature are high enough, this happens for a very long time. After a while
Although high mass stars are large there are less of them in the Universe, because clouds of gas condense into many smaller stars. Despite the fact the fact that these stars have reduced numbers they still have distinguishing characteristics. These stars can go through different types of fusion than other stars, this allows the stars to still burn after all the hydrogen and helium have been used up. In this the high mass stars can create helium with hydrogen fusion, which means these stars can fuse large elements later in life. These stars also have an increased gravitational field, which produces the heat that starts the fusion. Fusion occurs more in a high mass star, which results in a lower life expectancy. Although the fusion of a high mass star is faster, it still is