Preview

Heroism In Terry And 8th Juror

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
248 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Heroism In Terry And 8th Juror
When there is suppression and exploitation of voices, standing up to a group can prove to be difficult to the unrecognised heroes. Both Terry and 8th Juror, the protagonists in the texts experience self-doubt in their journey to heroism through daring actions that eventually getting them to success. Whilst the reader can identify the initial courage in 8th Juror voting ‘not guilty,’ against the opposing jurors and the majority bias, the reader can note through the stage directions his anxiousness leading up to revealing his vote “The 8th Juror turns, startled.” He’s logical sense came forward unlike the biased and lazy judgement of the other jurors. “There were eleven votes for “guilty.” It’s not easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fahrenheit 451 Quotes

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “I’m one of the innocents who could have spoken up and out when no one would listen to the ‘guilty,’ but I did not speak and thus became guilty myself.”…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My favorite person in the movie of 12 angry men was especially juror number 8 and the old man juror 9, also juror number 6. The reason i liked juror number 8 is because, juror 8 didn’t agree guilty right away just like the other jurors, number 8 really wanted to explain why everyone voted guilty. He didn’t right away think that the kid was really a murderer,because of the father as the court had said that the father was abusive and that the kid was everywhere as an orphan but so long to be beaten, number 8 thought after so long of taking all that abuse, who wouldn’t? And how number 8 really got everyone to really think about sending a kid to the electric chair, how he got everyone to vote not guilty. Also the reason i liked juror number 9 too…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    opinions and perspectives are displayed through the use of language techniques such as satire and theconstant juxtaposing of emotions, storytelling and the discernment of others perspectives. The Justice Gamewritten by Geoffrey Robertson is a personal account of high profile cases that he himself personally attendedand defended the all too commonly…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reginald Rose’s play, Twelve Angry Men, is about a jury’s decision making process in a murder trial. The facts in this play become blinded by the prejudices that some Juror’s possess. A prejudice jury became formed due to a biased testimony and the facts became clouded as generalisations were formed by the Juror’s. Some Juror’s bigotry can be based on their past experiences and discrimination didn’t only happen to the defendant, but it was also experienced by Juror’s themselves…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To Kill a Mockingbird’s themes of justice, morality, and ethics are represented through the actions and beliefs of the characters Atticus, Bob Ewell, and the town of Maycomb, represented through the Missionary Society, which is controlled by the sociable white women. Justice, as in justice by law, is inherent in the novel as is justice through karma. Morality is also central to the novel; a strong sense of morality, or rather a lack of, guides the characters as the story progresses. Ethics and unethical conduct form the basis for the plotline. Harper Lee uses characters to control the events that bring conflict in To Kill a Mockingbird.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    each juror has there own deficiencies or less than ideal qualities, these emerge through their interactions with eachother or their attitudes towards their trial. juror 10 is predjudice regularly using stereotypes to condemn the defendsant without actually considering if what he is saying is true. such as ‘a very big drinker’ or a born liar’ the third juror is guilty of stereotyping the defendant based on age, and he defends his opinions and stereotypes violently in the jury room, such as his near attack on 8th juror at the end of the first act. the play does not let a single character escape unflawed. even 8th juror,…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How has the novel affected your ideas of PERSONAL COURAGE in the face of INJUSTICE/ prejudice? Refer to elements of the PLOT and specific CHARACTERS to support your position/ comments.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. How does the play/film Twelve Angry Men deepen our understanding of the constitutional guarantee of the right to trial by jury and the role of the jury system in American…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the story Billy Budd, By Herman Melville, readers are introduced to the conflict of good and evil between Billy Budd and Claggart. However, there is another conflict, which, in ways is more significant than the epic clash of good and evil. The conflict of Captain Vere's struggle between duty and conscience; Melville sets up this conflict by placing a man with the innocence of a child, in the hands of a captain worried about war. This moral dilemma brings forth the question of whether or not Captain Vere was justified in the hanging of Billy Budd.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Today at the maycomb courthouse it Tom Robinson v.s. Mayella, the sheriff and bob ewell. Supposedly Tom raped Mayella on october 21st. He then hit her in the face but he couldn't have because his left hand is messed. Who knows how it will turn out with three witnesses.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Composers represent conflicting perspectives through their own unique experiences and values as their political and social contexts. Geoffrey Robertson's self styled memoir 'The Justice Game' written in the late 1900's heavily reflects these conflicting perspectives in the 'Trials of Oz' and 'The Romans in Britain' through the employment of emotive and persuasive language and ridicule in the form of satire to which convey Robertson's view through his eyes. Such conflicts also portrayed in Charles Waterstreet's article' It's a long fickle road to justice' which similar to Robertson's use of persuasive techniques utilizes satire to challenge and question the myopic procedures of the legal system.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice is defined as something or some action that is “according to what is morally right and fair”. Within To Kill a Mockingbird there are many different instances of justice being, or not being, served. There are also plenty of cases of the word “justice” being used in various manners. Many would say that justice was not served in Maycomb. Tom Robinson was persecuted based on nothing but allegations and his skin color. Despite this, he was found guilty and ultimately was killed. Many, however, would say that justice was served in the case of the death of Bob Ewell. Personally, I believe that justice was not served in any way.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jury of her Peers

    • 3002 Words
    • 13 Pages

    This literary analysis will demonstrate, and examine, two profoundly different types of leadership. The hierarchy of needs and the two sources from which power are derived will also be discussed and demonstrated as to how these concepts apply to A Jury of Her Peers. Critical thinking principles will be utilized in the analysis of A Jury of Her Peers, as well as comparisons of society’s mentality of the story’s time period to that of present times. Through critical thinking, this analysis will determine which genders’ methods of investigation provided a more balanced and conclusive approach.…

    • 3002 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men is a play about a young boy on trial for murdering his father. If the boy is found guilty, he will be sentenced to death. The jury men are very aware of this fact, most are perfectly fine with sending this boy to die as one man searches for the empathy of his jury peers. One by one the jury begins to sway toward the not guilty plea, as every fact thrown into conversation gets disproved. Now, one lone juror faces not the pressure of his peers but the pressure of his emotional attachment to the case to see that the boy be punished. This finally leads to Juror #3’s inevitable surrender of not guilty.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As juror 8's campaign continues, and the seed of doubt planted into the "guilty" minded jury members is fertilised thorough the analysing of facts the reasonable doubt slowly grows in the jurors minds, the audience begin to create an understanding that doubt is an easier state of mind…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays