Preview

Hegel Vs Kant

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
921 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hegel Vs Kant
Lanz Romulo N. Deiparine ENGLCOM A56 24-02-12

Compare and Contrast Essay on Spirit as the Philosophical State of Mind

(Hegel's Spirit/Mind and Philosophies VS. Kant's Reason/Soul and Philosophies)

I. Introduction

II. Argument 1: Divisions and Facilities A.) Divisions of Spirit B.) Faculties of Soul

III. Argument 2: Idealism A.) Hegelian Absolute Idealism B.) Kantian Transcendental Idealism

IV. Argument three: The Dialectic A.) Hegelian Theory of Dialectics B.) Kantian Transcendental Dialectics

V. Conclusion

Spirit in Philosophy is regarded as another word for the Mind or the Mental Consciousness of human beings. The most renowned philosophies regarding Spirit is by Georg Hegel and his works; his
…show more content…
Essentially, it is any philosophy which argues that the only thing actually knowable is consciousness (or the contents of consciousness), whereas we never can be sure that matter or anything in the outside world really exists. Thus, the only real things are mental entities, not physical things (which exist only in the sense that they are perceived). Hegel formulated an Idealism he called Absolute Idealism which was to state that only by which there is an identity of though and being can human reason know something. He also “continued” Kant’s concept of “thing in itself” in a way that he managed to conceptualized Geist or the Human mind or Spirit and the Zeitgeist (spirit of the ages) which was when the human mind progresses throughout time and changes like trends; he also stated that only by an interaction of opposites can we desire to progress and achieve understanding, for both the Geist and Zeitgeist, and the view of the being as being more dynamic to give more diversity on the concepts we use to understand the world we live in. Kant, on the other hand, formulated an Idealism that would contain concepts that helped remake a new concept for Hegel to use, he formulated the Transcendental Idealism. He focuses on how things would appear to us and how that becomes our experience; a focus in which he constructed to see not just an objective world of representations and experiences made but a reality that is beyond what human reason can comprehend: the noumenon or “the thing in itself”, a concept he uses to ironically be our ground for human representation even though it cannot independently exist (Philosophy Basics,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Bible 104 Study Guide

    • 2042 Words
    • 9 Pages

    2. What is the difference between soul and spirit? Why is that important? The soul is the non-physical part of both humans and animals that makes them living beings. Spirit is what gives the beings a mind, emotions, and a will. Seperating them from animal.…

    • 2042 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Julien Musolino, a cognitive scientist, the current scientific consensus denies any view of a soul or spirit as being separate from the brain. For the naturalist, which are individuals that subscribe to the philosophy that all of our credible science and understanding of the world is based on physical reality, there really is no reason to bring in fanciful notions like the soul into play. This concept of the soul can just be referred to as the mind and just because we do not fully understand it, it does not mean individuals should just use superstition to fill the void for lack of information on the subject. However, there are more arguments that support my…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Everything is one mind or one spirit, and they don’t mean that it is a human mind or spirit. It is one god and we are all a part of this god.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    spirit and the capability of it reaching the "Over Soul". The "Over Soul" is the so-called state in…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In your opinion, how is the spirit and personality linked? Where does the idea of a spirit fit within your own theory of personality?…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    And Spiritism is attempts to communicate with the death, it tells you what should you do in your life time and after you are dead, you can get to live with god.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Heilbroner Vs Kant

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to the philosophers Heilbroner, Kant, and Mill ethics can be beneficiary to the human race; for in the instance that ethics can make you a better person in society. Mill believed that the things (events, material items, choices, etc.) that made the most people happy were the most morally good thing to do (par 1). Kant believed that if your intentions are good, your morals are good. Kant also had his Categorical Imperatives which is his view on how one’s maxims (subjective principles of actions) become a universal law (i.e. MURDER) (par 3). Heilbroner goes on to discuss about the future, the environment, and what we do now could benefit the future people (pg 1 par. 1). In this essay I will discuss Heilbroner’s point about the limits…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A human spirit is the psychology of an individual, it is the mental state of one’s mind. An individual with a strong human spirit often holds the ability to resist, fight or bounce back. Having a strong human spirit is essential for any journey to overcome the countless challenges and obstacles faced on physical, emotional or inner levels.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is a categorical imperative? A categorical imperative is a moral obligation which is absolute and necessary in any moral situation and isn’t reliant on a singular person’s desires or wills. For Kant, categorical imperatives are the foundation for morality because they invoke “pure” reasons for our moral actions and decisions since each rational being reasons to act outside of their own personal desires or will which may cloud judgments or impose a biased verdict of the situation. Kant explains this by distinguishing two different kinds of imperatives; categorical and hypothetical. Obviously Kant is interested in categorical imperatives and uses this distinction to show the difference between them so that categorical imperatives come out stronger. As stated before, categorical imperatives according to Kant are moral obligations which are absolute and necessary in any moral situation and isn’t reliant on a particular person’s desires or purpose. He also says that categorical imperatives (obligations) are such if they are of a commanding or imposing nature. For example “Don’t murder!” is a categorical imperative which is binding to every rational person and forces a person to act of good will. Hypothetical imperatives on the other hand are obligations in which there is an end result of your action which is in turn a result of your personal desires our thoughts. An example of a hypothetical imperative is the statement “If you want to stay out of jail, then don’t murder”. Here, there is no sense of authority behind it; it doesn’t have any weight or value behind it.…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of the soul varies widely in religious tradition. While these variations exist, its basic definition is unvarying. The soul can be described as the ultimate internal principle by which we think, feel, and will, and by which our bodies are animated. The soul is seen as the core principle of life or as the essence of a being 1. Views on the permanence of the soul vary throughout religious tradition as well. While some view it as a mortal entity in flux others believe the soul is an immortal and permanent unit. These interpretations vary from time period to time period and between religions. These characteristics of the soul are interpreted differently through an Eastern or Western perspective. In general, Eastern and Western Religions, with the exception of Buddhism, consider the soul to be a permanent entity, which is either reborn or sentenced to a permanent heaven or hell.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I personally believe the Kant is wrong when he says the we are advancing towards a universal morality. I believe the “morality” is something that changes over time, and something that we as a species make up. Throughout history there have been many definitions of whet is constituted as moral and what’s not. Homosexuality is an easy one to write about in this regard. For example, in the ancient Roman times it was completely acceptable to have a same-sex relationship, and nobody would get judged for doing it. Advance to the early 1900s and homosexuality becomes immoral due to a change in the dominant religion. Morality has always had a close tie to religion, and the two will probably never separate. Morality is also sometimes tied very closely…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assess Idealism

    • 718 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Idealism is an anti-realist theory of perception which suggests that all objects exist mind-dependently. I will take an indirect realist standpoint and will be arguing against the theory of idealism.…

    • 718 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    This essay will present a critical discussion on Schopenhauer’s idea of Transcendental Idealism. It will attempt to underline some of the key facts regarding this idea and then would take note of some critical evaluation which is being done upon the idea by many well-known scholars. Throughout the critical analysis, some key aspects of the idea of Transcendental Idealism would also be discusses from which the core essence of the theory would be analysed. This is done so that the reader would be able to grasp proper understanding of the ideas of Schopenhauer. The essay would also assess the concepts of Will and Cognition which were discussed by Schopenhauer.…

    • 2325 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Progress of the Absolute

    • 5835 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Hegel’s majestic system was intended, among other things, to interpret the nature of Being in such a way as to deprive contingency of its effect while at the same time preserving the richness and variety of the universe. Contrary to Schelling’s idealism, Hegel did not wish to reduce Being to the undifferentiated identity of the Absolute, in which the variety and muplicity of finite reality must be lost or dismissed as an illusion; and again, in opposition to Kant, he refused to regard the thinking subject as abandoned helplessly to the experience of the variety and multiplicity, presented to him endlessly as a datum without reason or meaning. His purpose was to interpret the universe as entirely meaningful without sacrificing its differentiation. This required, as he wrote, ‘a self-origination of the wealth of detail, and a self-determining distinction of shapes and forms’ (Phenomenology of Mind, Preface).…

    • 5835 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    kelsen

    • 999 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A prominent difficulty preventing us from drawing a coherent picture of K’s PTL is the presence of 2 groups of ideas that stem from quite dif philo- trad and are not only difficult to reconcile but some argue are radically incompatible.…

    • 999 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays