Preview

Hannibal's Defeat Of Carthage In The First Punic War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
661 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hannibal's Defeat Of Carthage In The First Punic War
Because the Romans were successful at defeating the state of Carthage in the First Punic War, Hannibal Barca was determined to retaliate and claim victory over the Romans. Hannibal’s threats caused widespread fear amongst Italian citizens for many years. For the Second Punic War, Hannibal looked to his father, a great commander of Spain, to assist him with forming a powerful army. Hannibal was able to gather 50,000 infantry, 9,000 cavalry, and several elephants for his journey from Spain to Rome. Hannibal traveled by land instead of by water because he was aware of the Roman’s presence at the Mediterranean Sea.
The Roman army, led by Publius Cornelius Scipio the Elder, was seemingly prepared for Hannibal’s attack on Rome. Scipio enlisted the help of his brother, Gnaeus, in an effort to prevent an invasion of Rome. After an overdue attempt at blocking Hannibal at Massilia, Hannibal rerouted north towards the Rhone River. Scipio then sent Gnaeus to Spain to fight off any Carthaginian forces that may have been planning to join Hannibal at a later time. Since Hannibal
…show more content…
With two leaders, the Romans could alternate leadership daily and possibly benefit from the individual strengths of both Varro and Paulus. During the battle of Cannae, Varro decided to push forward with an attack against Hannibal, ignoring Paulus’ reservations. Hannibal was prepared for a strategic battle and lined his army up in flanks near the river banks. The typical army setup placed the cavalry at the wings and the infantry at the center. Instead, Hannibal sent the weaker Gauls and Spanish foot soldiers to the center and reserved stronger African foot soldiers for the flanks. The Romans advanced towards the Gauls and Spanish, but the Africans moved inward, surrounding the Romans from both sides. The Romans were trapped and unable to escape defeat. Hannibal proved that strategy is more valuable than

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Furthermore, they most likely did not have the power or the military force to stop Hannibal had they wanted to do so. Moreover, should they choose to confront Hannibal, they most likely would lose all their economic gains in Spain after the First War. By fighting Rome, they were protecting their interests. A common misconception portrays Hannibal as the sole protagonist against the Romans, but the Carthaginian government also involved themselves in the conflict. Although they did not do as much as Hannibal during the war, the senate still helped in the war. Yet again, the Barcid faction triumphed over the impotent Hannonite…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal became a Carthaginian statesman and eventually grew in power. The Romans were scared that with Hannibal’s increase in power, he would lead another revolt against them. They made Hannibal give up his power and they exiled him. Hannibal traveled to many places including Tyrus, Ephesus, Crete, and Asia Minor. In Ephesus, King Antiochus, was at war with the Romans. Antiochus put Hannibal in control of one if his fleets, but he was defeated. After this, Antiochus was prepared to give Hannibal to the forces of Rome. Hannibal then fled to Crete, after a while, Hannibal was ready to go back to Asia Minor. King Prusias let Hannibal stay with him and Hannibal helped him in the war against Rome’s allies. Hannibal won many victories for Prusias, but the Romans let Hannibal keep helping him. They forced Prusias to hand Hannibal over. Hannibal was not ready to fall into the hands of the Romans. In 183 B.C. Hannibal ingested a deadly poison and…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Scipio Africanus Outline

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This act caused Hannibal to leave Italy and return to Africa to fight Scipio. In 202 BC…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One general, wreaking havoc throughout the Roman lands was known as Hannibal Barca. Following in his father’s footsteps as a superior military general, he challenged Rome in battle every chance he could. After several attempts of coaxing Rome into battle he achieves a decent victory at the Battle of Trasimene in 217…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He defeated the Carthaginians led by the legendary general, Hannibal at the northern city of Zama in Africa. By doing so, he ended the nearly 20 year old war. In this battle, the Romans were numerically deficient in infantry but where outnumbered in cavalry. After an extended skirmish between Rome and the Carthaginians, the light infantry and the mix of light infantry and war elephants deployed by Hannibal, and cause the man formations of the 2 sides to meet. Hannibal sends his army in echelon formation to envelop the roman flanks but ends up loosing the battle. The Battle of Zama was the last and decisive victory to the second Punic war. Zama was one of the three wars between Carthage and Rome and resulted in the destruction of Carthage and is annexed by Rome. A modern but similar battle to Zama was the Battle of Waterloo. Napoleon, another legendary general, led the French to battle against the English and their allies. Although Napoleon had a great reputation, Wellington, the general of the European side, proved to have more intelligence when he outsmarts Napoleon's plan and defeats the French. Both battles saw the final defeat of a famed and "invincible" military leader, Hannibal at Zama and Napoleon at Waterloo. Also, both battles were decisive battles in that they ultimately end the great wars. The Battle of Zama ended the 2nd Punic war and the Battle of Waterloo ended the Napoleonic wars. All in…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He is most remembered for marching an army of thousands which included war elephants, from Iberia over the Pyrenees and the Alps into the northern part of Italy. During the first years of his fifteen year occupation of Italy, Hannibal and his armies were able to take Trebia, Trasimene and Cannae. In addition he was able to build alliances with some Romans. However, Scipio of North Africa had spent time analyzing and studying Hannibal’s tactics, he added some of his own and launched a counter invasion from the Northern part of Africa. Scipio sent Hannibal and his troops back to Carthage where he and his troops were defeated at the Battle of…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ceasar's Gallic Campaign

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Conquest of Gaul was a military expansion by the Roman Republic, which started in Transalpine Gaul (Southern France) and included two expeditions into Britain and an expedition over the Rhine into Germania. The conquest of Gaul originally started as the repulsion of a Gallic tribe called the Helvetti. Caesar stated that “Orgetorix was the Gallic chieftain ordered the tribe to move through Roman land” .Through a series of pitched battle the Helvetti were routed and Roman land had been defended. Then Ariovistus a, German warlord, launched a campaign to conquer land in Gaul. Goldsworthy highlights how this escalates commenting that it “led on to further conflicts with more distant tribes, till Caesar’s legions had subdue the whole area”. Caesar subdued all of Gaul and then began to venture further abroad. “Caesar made active preparations for expeditions to Britain because he knew that in almost all the Gallic campaigns the Gaul’s had received reinforcements from the Britons” . After being repulsed from Britain in both of his expeditions due to storms the final major conflict was to occur in the Gallic war. “In 52 BC a revolt broke out under the command of…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    -While the Britons were led by Boudicca, the Romans were led by Suetonius Paulinus, the governor of the area. Boudicca is described as riding a chariot and leading an army of 230,000 men. Paulinus is said to have far fewer men, being unable to match the efforts of Boudicca. Dio describes the Romans are being organised and efficient, while the Britons have been described as being disorganised.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When barbarians tried to attack Rome, the mountains stood in their way. Even if they made it over these monstrosities, the army would be prepared for a fight by the time. On top of this, the city of Rome had huge walls to keep them out. The walls were impenetrable, giving Rome the opportunity to pick them off from the safety of the empire.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As I have just spoken with Hannibal, he assures me that another conflict with Rome will end in their defeat and Carthage standing on top, victorious. We have already discussed strategy and there is virtually no way we can lose. We will strike where they are vulnerable. Their arrogance will be their downfall. Rome was determined to extend their reach as far north as the Alps and they have instigated conflict with the Gauls over this region. They feel that securing this area will create an impassible barrier to their north with their armies and navy securing the southern regions. They would never expect an assault from the north; especially one from us. Hannibal has been in contact with the Gauls and has their support. Our two regions are now allies. We have already proposed plans for an invasion with full support by the Gauls and the Gallic tribes.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A station that has been defeated would gather up their skirts and retaliate; they would not let a legion’s destruction go unpunished, Romans were not known to back down from a fight. They were most commonly instigators and would definitely not try to hide or run away from a defeat. Multiple situations and battles during Roman history prove their military’s persistence and their ability to overcome a defeat and retaliate. Historical sources relate that in 390 BC, several Gallic tribes from Transalpine Gaul region invaded Italy from the north. Rome was then attacked and destroyed. In the event of an ambush or a major defeat of the Roman army, news of the account would be immediately sent to surrounding campaigns, to Rome, as well as other cities. In turn the camps and the cities would send aid to the fallen legion, and attack the enemy. In this case the citizens who left for protection manage to raise an army under Camillus. The military waited until the Gauls divided their army in order to obtain food while the other half was left to keep the city secure. The Gaulish army collecting…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This gave Rome the time to fortify what defences it had in the capital, making an irremovable stronghold for the Romans. This also allowed them to build new fortifications in the Alps and along the northern Italian frontier. This would prove problematic for Hannibal’s forces in their attempt to capture Rome and move through Italy swiftly. Though the ancients were not that good at siege operations, the equipment would have given Hannibal a shot at it. It would seem that the Carthaginian general needed the equipment if he was to stand a chance against the Roman defences, but alternatively, would have faced loosing his whole army in the Alps and Apennines if he had brought it.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The final question in need of asking is, was Hannibal ever close to completing his was Hannibal ever close to getting to Rome. The answer to that question is that Hannibal withdrew before he could attempt the final attack on Rome. As explained by Polybius,…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Army

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Army was one of the most successful armies in the past as they conquered most of the land in Europe. There were very successful because of their excellent organization, strict recruitment policy, hard training, well equipped armors and equipment and intelligent tactics.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cassius vs Brutus

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cassius formed the conspiracy with motives based solely on envy, and he believed that Caesar was not going to be a good enough ruler. He says: "...it doth amaze me A man of such feeble temper should So get the start of the majestic world And bear the palm alone." (I,ii,128-31) Cassius also thought that he was also much stronger than Caesar. Cassius says: "...Caesar said to me, `Dearest thou, Cassius, now Leap in with me into this angry flood, And swim to yonder point?' Upon the word Accoutred as I was, I plunged in and bade him follow; so indeed he did. The torrent roared...but ere we could arrive the point proposed, Caesar cried, `Help me Cassius, or I sink.'...So from the waves of Tiber Did I the tired Caesar: and this man Is now become a god and Cassius is A wretched creature...". (I,ii,102-117) Cassius had to save Caesar from the river, which draws him to the conclusion that he deserves recognition for his strength over Caesar. One of Brutus' flaws is that he is not very bright. He is an idealist; he doesn't think about the consequences of Caesar's murder. For example, when Cassius presented the idea of swearing an oath of secrecy within the conspiracy, Brutus assumes that all of the other men were as noble as he and would not tell…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays