Preview

Half Earth Edward Wilson Summary

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1204 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Half Earth Edward Wilson Summary
Edward Wilson wrote Half Earth: Our Plants Fight for Life as a way to propose a solution to a crisis plaguing the earth at this very moment. He separates his work into three parts: The Problem, The Real Living World, and The Solution. While Wilson does set the stage for why a solution is needed, his solution does not live up to the stage that was set, as it does not appear to be realistic. He does not describe exactly how something like this would even begin to happen. It’s easy to just give ideas but if there are no guidelines presented then how is anyone suppose to take the idea and put it into action? He also seems very adamant in believing only by following exactly what he is offering as solution will we be able to save the planet. He writes …show more content…
The rate of loss is instead accelerating.” Right now the earth has about 15% of Earths land and 2.8% of the Earths oceans as reserved purely for biodiversity, Wilson wants to bring that to 50%. While he is realistic in understanding that no one will just automatically give up ownership of their own land, believing that 50% of earth can “be allowed to exist unharmed (pg 189)" is a bit unrealistic. With the growing population, how are we suppose to find space for everyone if we cut down the amount of space available for human use. He writes “the key to saving one-half of the planet is the ecological footprint, defined as the amount of space required to meet all of the needs of an average person (pg 189), but he doesn’t really detail as to how we can lessen the ecological footprint of a person. Take half the earth and set it aside for the wilderness, easy to say, but half the earth includes 195 countries. How would we get 195 countries to be on board with this plan when, the one of the most powerful nations in the country, the US, is opposed to even the Paris agreement, I guess you could say is a milder version of a solution to environment sustainability when compared to a solution like the one offered in this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Sbi4U Course Outline

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Technological developments can contribute to or help offset the ecological footprint associated with population growth and the consumption of natural…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For hundreds of years, people have grow with a concept of the more is better. The growth of nation economy makes more money and therefore a better quality of life. But now, things have changed. He descripted our new eaarth as “a played-out rock and a hot place”. We are drilling and extracting fossil fuels, burning them into CO2 that causes greenhouse effect.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    E.O. Wilson's solution is set aside part of the earth with no human intervention and he said to “let nature do its thing.” He specifically wants to preserve lands with the riches/biodiversity like Brazil and Ecuador. He wants this because there is a relationship between size of habitat and the number of species that can live in the habitat it’s an ecological law. So if there is more land with biodiversity there will be more animals. However some argue that this may affect food production but Wilson counter argues with the increase of technology this possible because technology allows us to be more efficient and use less energy when we make food production. We do not have…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The main concept for the sustainability plan is geared mainly on a concept of ‘One planet living’’, this persuaded people to live within the world’s…

    • 2599 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our environment is our responsibility and it is time that everyone starts working towards caring and protecting it. Although our planet is at stake and protecting it won’t happen overnight, addressing global issues of climate change needs to an integral activity for each individual. Human activity has changed our planet drastically so the actions of people need to be regulated and mitigated to ensure that the planet’s life becomes more manageable and well cared for. By doing so, we will be able to preserve the planet, humankind, and the species and combat the sixth extinction as advised by Elizabeth Kolbert. This is a very serious issue and people need to start applying the ideas of McDonough and O’Connor as well as Bill Gates. Rachel Carson, credited by many to have brought the issues of conservation to the public eye, believed that “people care about the problem of sharing the planet with other species” and that increasing this awareness would be enough to avert the global impact of Kolbert’s “sixth…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    More than 97% of climate scientists agree that we, humans, are causing climate change by burning fossil fuels and cutting down trees. Too bad trees don’t provide us with Wi-Fi or money, we’d be planting them like crazy, unfortunately, however, they only provide us with the oxygen that we breathe. There shouldn’t be any debate about whether global warming is real or not, we know its real, there’s numerous evidence to support that, instead it should be what we’re going to do about it.…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sustainability calls for new thinking and new ways of balancing the ecosystem so that life and nature are preserved for generations unborn. Nature's resources are not infinitesimal. Hence, nature should be judiciously used and preserved. Daniel Quinn's book, "Ishmael" consists of some weaknesses. One of such weakness is, rather than state the directions the world should change and how to achieve the change, he simply appeals to people to change their minds. I believe that for a mind change to be meaningful and useful, there is a need for direction and instructions towards the desired change and towards making the world better. The government, for instance, use incentives to keep the economy stable and encourage production and exploitation of natural resources. There is a need for an elaboration of the negative impacts of production and exploitation of nature and the desired course of action to remedy the negative fallouts. How does Man change their minds, if they are clueless about how dangerously their actions are affecting the world.? This leads to another weakness portrayed in Quinn’s novel. Man is irrational, they fail to act accordingly, rather would think out of any reason just to ignore an existing issue. For example, global warming. There are scientific proofs and long…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Global warming including climate change is clearly problem that concern to be solved by individual efforts of states, but must be done collectively if it is to be done successfully at…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine living in a world where there is ever-changing climates and sinking economies. A world where there is constant drought, few forests and natural areas. A world where our favourite animals extinct and the rising costs of food, water and energy. This all seems very frightening, but we need to remember that we have the ability to curb this problem and bounce back Earth to its glory days.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quality of Life

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mankind finds itself engaged in what Prince Charles described as ‘an act of suicide on a grand scale’ [4], facing what the UK’s Chief Scientific Advisor John Beddington called a ‘perfect storm’ of environmental problems [5]. The most serious of these problems show signs of rapidly escalating severity, especially climate disruption. But other elements could potentially also contribute to a collapse: an accelerating extinction of animal and plant populations and species, which could lead to a loss of ecosystem services essential for human survival. These are not separate problems; rather they interact in two gigantic complex adaptive systems: the biosphere system and the human socio-economic system. The human population size now is above the planet’s long-term carrying capacity is suggested (conservatively) by ecological footprint analysis [18–20]. It shows that to support today’s population of seven billion sustainably would require roughly half an additional planet; to do so, if all citizens of Earth consumed resources at the US level would take four to five more Earths. Adding the projected 2.5 billion more people by 2050 would make the human assault on civilization’s life-support systems disproportionately worse, because almost everywhere people face systems with nonlinear responses [11,21–23], in which environmental damage increases at a rate that becomes faster with each additional person. This is why environmental protection must be prioritized over resource extraction; environmental damage will cause…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Traxler says that each nation should limit the proportion of emissions that they cause. The problem with this is that first world nations have already developed off the back of said harmful emissions. Which means that these nations have effectively denied less developed countries their share of fossil-fuel-based development in the future. This proposal will keep less developed…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article, The Earth Is Full, Friedman (2011) begins by stating that in recent years, first decade of 21st century, humanity encounters dangers that threaten humanity and the nature because of their unconcerned behaviors. Economic problems, high growing population rate and natural disasters compel humans to question about those recent years. The writer then moves on to the veteran Australian environmentalist-entrepreneur Paul Gilding and his book, Gilding, P. (2011) The Great Disruption: Why the climate crisis will bring on the end of shopping and the birth of a new world. New York: Bloomsbury Press. Gilding (2011) discusses how much land and water area humanity needs to produce the resources they consume and absorb their waste. According to Gilding (2011), earth is growing at a dangerous rate and points out that over-used resources and worsening ecologic environment damage to social and economic system. Friedman reports the current growth rate is 150 percent of earth’s sustainable capacity and states that excessive use of resources and too much waste that creates the problem, “The Earth Is Full.” He mentions about two loops; first, population growth and global warming push up food prices, which leads to political instability, which leads to higher oil prices, which leads to higher food prices, and so on in a insurmountable circle. Second, higher productivity means fewer jobs, which requires humans to produce more sources to create jobs. The more sources create global warming. Afterwards, the writer turns his attention to possible solutions. The solutions are discussed by giving Gilding’s eco-optimist view. In the article, also it is stated that economic systems are not changed without a crisis. Friedman (2011) states that “But don’t worry, we’re getting there.” Finally, Friedman prefers to use quotations from Gilding who say nations are heading for a crisis-driven choice and develop a new sustainable economic model slowly.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lester Brown is not only an environmental activist and founder/president of the non-profit environmental think tank known as the Earth Policy Institute, but he is also an accomplished author. In his book, Plan B 4.0 (his latest of three priors and most updated rendition of Plan B), Brown pushes his audience to get on board with his plans to restructure the global economy by stabilizing climate and population, eradicating poverty, reversing the current path of environmental destruction and restoring the natural support systems of our beautiful planet. To accomplish all of these interdependent goals may seem to be an unattainable task but the author does a wonderful job of laying out reasonable paths to success in all regards. One of the many great things about Brown’s plan is that it is congruent with our current technological capabilities and with an international effort equivalent to that of the wartime mobilization known as the Marshall Plan that helped rebuild Europe and Japan after WWII, the initiative could in fact stop what is inevitably going to be severe economic decline and quite possibly a collapse. Brown is quoted as saying, “we used to just talk about saving the planet, but it is civilization itself that is now at risk” and “like earlier civilizations that got into environmental trouble, we have to make a choice. We can stay with business as usual and watch our economy decline and our civilization unravel, or we can adopt Plan B and be the generation that mobilizes to save civilization. Our generation will make the decision, but it will affect life on Earth for all generations to come.” (Brown interview 2009)…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world has shrunk in nature and forests all kind of ways like fires and people cutting trees. We try to keep America alive by making houses and making electricity for us but we got to think about the earth and if we keep going this path way we are in rite now, the whole human race can die off. If we start to clean after us and be more resourceful, then that’s the good track that America needs to take. We got to take care of our earth because we only have one…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    E.O. Wilson said, “The one process ongoing ... that will take millions of years to correct is the loss of genetic and species diversity by the destruction of natural habitats. This is the folly our descendants are least likely to forgive us.” This theory has been the fuel for the modern “Go Green” campaign. Individuals everywhere have formed organizations promoting new resources that do not compromise the state of our planet. Ideas are being televised worldwide to educate people and suggest new ways of heating our homes or washing our clothes with a new detergent. With this in mind, it could only be a matter of time before the government requires everyone to follow certain procedures for the disposal of waste or building a house. Suddenly, it just does not seem so important…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays