Preview

Habeas Corpus

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2294 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Habeas Corpus
In the past few years there has been people seeking the question "what is the right process of eliminating terrorist from non-terrorist?" How does this affect the United States and what things can we do to make it better. In are efforts to understand this we need to start off from the beginning by learning what Habeas Corpus is, where it comes from and how America follows its traditions. The best place to start off is what Habeas Corpus means, it comes from a Latin term which means “you have the body”. It means to bring a person that is under arrest to court or before a judge. The reason for Habeas Corpus is so that a prisoner can be released unlawfully if there is lack of evidence or cause. Habeas Corpus originated from the English legal system and is now used in many countries around the world, it is also known as “Great Writ”. Habeas Corpus “Great Writ” was first used in England not for helping detainees, but for helping government officials in the judicial process and remuneration. The origin explains why there has been much controversy because Habeas Corpus wasn’t made to help as Edward Jenks famously said “Originally not intended to get people out of prison, but to put them in it”(Gregory, 2011). Habeas Corpus is talked about in the Constitution in Article I, Section 9. There it is stated that “The Privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it”. During are United States history there has been many times that Habeas Corpus was suspended. During the beginning of the Civil War in 1861 President Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus, his decision was upheld by congress. This brought issues because it was said that it wasn’t in the president’s hands to do so. “The Supreme Court 's liberal decisions in the 1950s and 1960s in the area of prisoners ' rights encouraged many incarcerated persons to file writs challenging their convictions, but the Court under William Rehnquist


References: I. Bigornia, A. P. (1994). HABEAS CORPUS--FIFTH AMENDMENT--THE SUPREME COURT 'S COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF FEDERAL HABEAS REVIEW OF ALLEGED MIRANDA VIOLATIONS. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 84(4), 915-942. II. http://billofrightsinstitute.org/resources/educator-resources/americapedia/americapedia-constitution-text/habeas-corpus/ III. Foley, B.J. (2007). GUANTANAMO AND BEYOND: DANGERS OF RIGGING THE IV. RULES. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 97(4), 1009-1069. V. GREGORY, A. (2011). "The Tissue of the Structure" Habeas Corpus and the Great Writ 's Paradox of Power and Liberty. Independent Review, 16(1), 53-91. VI. Habeas corpus. (2013). Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th Edition, 1. VII. Habeas corpus in the United States. (2013, June 2). In Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 02:24, June 11, 2013, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Habeas_corpus_in_the_United_States&oldid=558010386 VIII. THE FORGOTTEN CORE MEANING OF THE SUSPENSION CLAUSE. (2012). Harvard Law Review, 125(4), 901-1017.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Challenges Did England Face After The French And Indian War
    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Challenges Did England Face After The French And Indian War

    The writ of habeas corpus is when you get arrested and you say “writ of habeas corpus” to be brought to a judge so he could tell you why you’ve been arrested. If there is no reason to be arrested, then, you are free to leave. It was made for people who didn’t even know why they were sent to jail. They just got arrested one day and didn’t know what they did wrong.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Vs. Arizona Case Study
    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Miranda Vs. Arizona Case Study

    The second of the Supreme Court Cases to be discussed is Miranda V. Arizona. The importance of this case is that Miranda was interrogated without knowledge of his 5th amendment rights. In this specific case, the police arrested Miranda from his home in order to take him into investigation at the Phoenix police station. While Miranda was put on trial, he was not informed that he had a right to an attorney. From this the officers were able to retrieve a signed written statement from Miranda. Most importantly, this letter stated that Miranda had full knowledge of his legal rights. From the evidence found, Miranda was sentenced to prison for 20 to 30 years. From here the Supreme Court stated that, “...Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession…” (Miranda V Arizona).…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Abraham Lincoln Suspend The Writ Of Habeas Corpus
    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Abraham Lincoln Suspend The Writ Of Habeas Corpus

    The framers of the Constitution sought that the writ shall be included in the body of the Constitution in Article I, Section 9, stating that, “The privilege of the writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in case of Rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.” (site) Abraham Lincoln believed and respected the Constitution and the traditional separation of powers, however he did not feel that the framers of the Constitution intended to wait for Congress to come together to make a decision in a time of crisis. President Lincoln did not want to get rid of the writ of Habeas Corpus because prior to becoming the president he had served in congress and was a lawyer himself and therefore he understood it’s meaning and importance. (site) Suspending the writ of Habeas Corpus was not an easy decision made by Lincoln, yet as the commander in Chief of the United States it was his duty to protect the country in these extreme circumstances of protests and…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror Essay Example
    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror Essay Example

    Throughout history, the motivation of man's self interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power in the absence of the rule of law. The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States whereas terrorists are apprehended and deprived of due process. The right of Habeas corpus overrules man's interpretation, in which allows those accused federal and state court representation before judge, or jury. It asserts that accusers deemed innocent until proven guilty, accusers possessed the right to representation, appear in person, and charges brought forth. This essay will concentrate on the evolution of habeas corpus, and its suspension by the United States, its relevance during the war on terror, and the United States Supreme Court's interpretation. Nevertheless, these laws are in place to protect every one, moreover to avoid unlawful apprehension, and ensure that habeas corpus works as intended by the Constitution.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Magna Carta Influence The American Government
    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did The Magna Carta Influence The American Government

    Habeas corpus: Prisoners often seek release by filing a petition for a writ of habeas…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Final Paper
    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages

    POL 201 Final Paper

    In this paper I will be deliberate on the history of Habeas Corpus and how it has matured over the years. I will describe the beginning of the Habeas Corpus and the position it takes part in the U.S. and what recent act is being used. The United States Constitution must be more effectively unified into the Guantanamo methods to give equal civil rights to inmates despite what their nationality maybe, but to also have more cordial ways of reviewing obstructive servicemen to absolutely verify if they really should be treated as extremists that we should fear.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror
    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror

    The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self-interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power. Habeas Corpus is written in the constitution as a right of the people and should be a safeguard to protect all accused persons, but many presidents have found ways not to enforce the right. In history the writ of habeas corpus has been challenged by many president from Lincoln to most recently Bush with abuse of power by the president. I will exam whether the president goes against the constitution to protect the safety of its citizens in a time of war or is it an abuse of power because the president is the commander and chief. Is the president acting on behalf of the people or is it a personal agenda.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeus Corpus and the War on Terror
    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeus Corpus and the War on Terror

    Have you ever felt like a piece of cheese on a mouse trap just waiting for that mouse to come by and eat you; maybe even a fly stuck in a spider’s web hoping that you can get away? Well I am sure if I had been one of those people in the mist of the chaos on September 11, 2001 that had changed the life of all Americans’ across the country. I would have felt no bigger than that piece of cheese or that fly caught in the web. We were victims of a horrific terrorist attack that shook the very core of our foundation as a country. Twelve years later we are still recovering from this horrendous act. We have been fighting the war on terror for ten years. This is one of the longest wars that the United States has ever fought. While the war rages on the boundaries between national security and civil liberties are blurred. “The big threat to America is the way we react to terrorism by throwing away what everybody values about our country—a commitment to human rights” (Kennedy, 2007). Individual liberties and freedoms are important since without them one can be held indefinitely. Habeas corpus does not infringe upon a person’s civil liberties. In addition, habeas corpus allows an individual to question why they are being detained and ensures that detainees have a right to a fair trial; it is considered to be one of the foundations of constitutional democracy.…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Supreme Court of the United States and Civil Liberties Union
    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Supreme Court of the United States and Civil Liberties Union

    Habeas corpus is derived from the Latin term “you have the body” which is the opening terms of a legal writ (Merriam-webster.com, 2013). Habeas corpus is a legal writ that a person or prisoner can use when they are being detained by the law illegally. A prisoner has the right to know the charges that he or she is being held for and they also have the right to a trial by a jury of his or her peers (Lobban & Halliday, 2011). Habeas corpus is the actual legal action that commands the law (police or military police) to have a court inquiry as to why the detainee is being detained (The Characters of Freedom, n.d.). If the person is being detained for insufficient or unjustifiable reasons the court can order the release of the prisoner. So basically putting it, Habeas corpus is identified as a legal safeguard that protects people’s individual rights and not being illegally imprisoned (A Constitutional History of Habeas Corpus, 1982).…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Difference Between Habeas Corpus And War On Terror
    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Difference Between Habeas Corpus And War On Terror

    We have heard in high school and news about Habeas Corpus and War on Terror, but what does those terms really mean? Habeas Corpus is an act that was established in 1679 by England’s Parliament to give prisoners a fair trial. The War on Terror was established on 9/2011 to bring war against Afghanistan for terrorizing the U.S. In this paper, I will further discuss Habeas Corpus and War on Terror and how the two came into terms with each other within the United States.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror

    4. The War and the Writ Habeas corpus and security in an age of terrorism…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror

    Do you recall "For liberty and Justice for all"? Well it seems as if those six words no longer exist in present day America. As a Veteran of the Military, I swore to serve and protect those foreign and domestic. Like many active duty and veteran military, I felt a sense of pride and accomplishment as a soldier knowing that I was fighting for a country where you had civil liberties. At the time it was truly the land of the free and the home of the brave. Unfortunately, those liberties, that most Americans take for granted and others flee to this country to obtain, was threatened on September 11, 2001. The nation suffered from a great deal of loss, pain, anger, and disbelief that was felt across the world. With emotions becoming more inflamed with thoughts of revenge, the American people wanted answers and even more importantly, they wanted to see immediate action against those that commented this act of terror against this great nation. In response, Former-President George W. Bush and his administration set out to capture those thought to be responsible for the terrorist attack. In addition, Former-President Bush and his administration went to great lengths to go beyond the reach of the judicial system which enforces the writ of Habeas Corpus. These actions have been highly debated all across the nation and even the world. Did the tragedy of September 11th, justify the actions of the Former-President? Was and is it fair that people were and are still locked away, stripped of their basic rights under the writ of Habeas Corpus? Is this “Great Nation” so powerful that the very laws that were put into place to protect now don’t apply? The following exams these questions and many more, including the writ of Habeas Corpus, legal debates regarding this topic, and the perspectives of Former-President Bush and his administration during the time immediately following the September 11th attack.…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas Corpus And War On Terror
    • 1522 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Habeas Corpus And War On Terror

    The Habeas Corpus and the War on terror will continue to affect all Americans and those that wage war against America. The effect might not be equal for both but equal rights for all and the fair and speedy trails is there for all individuals. Having the Habeas Corpus in effect helps those that are enemies of America to a fair trial and it also gives America a chance to interrogate and try stop terror. The war on terror presents an erratic challenge for the United States though terrorists are captured and deprived of due process. Several situations between 2004 and 2008 have put a major effect on the Habeas Corpus rule. Habeas Corpus should be in affect because it helps protects all individual’s rights and the Constitution because everyone deserves a fair trial.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Habeas Corpus And The War On Terror Essay
    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Habeas Corpus And The War On Terror Essay

    Habeas Corpus has been a part of our history for many years. It has been used only when the feel the need to use it and also it has been suspended by two of our former president. Habeas Corpus “is used to bring a prisoner or other detainee (e.g. institutionalized mental patient) before the court to determine if the person 's imprisonment or detention is lawful. In the US system, federal courts can use the writ of habeas corpus to determine if a state 's detention of a prisoner is valid.”(Cornell University Law School, 2010). In this essay I will discuss the historical evolution of habeas corpus, U.S. history of the suspension of habeas corpus, U.S. Supreme Court 's interpretation of the right of habeas corpus, and four perspectives on the Habeas Corpus.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Miranda Decision
    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Miranda Decision

    In 1966, the U.S. Supreme Court made a landmark ruling in the case of Miranda v. Arizona that established that a suspect has the right to remain silent and that prosecutors may not use statements made by defendants while in police custody unless the police have advised them of their rights.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics