Preview

Groupthink's Effect On Discussion In Groups

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
541 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Groupthink's Effect On Discussion In Groups
What effect has Groupthink had on discussion in groups and teams in your experience.
For politeness sake, I will avoid naming the location and people involved in this. The worst cause of groupthink I have been in was when I went to church summer camp. I was not, and still not, an outdoorsy person. I loved air conditioning, I loved my books, and I loved my privacy. I was stuck in a room with five other girls, all older than me. These girls were clearly close friends. Since I had no friends at camp; I blindly followed these girls for the three weeks we were there. Our leader was “Jane” she was a very commanding young woman. We would follow the schedule the camp had for us but after hours was Jane’s time to shine. I wouldn’t have minded Jane

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Groupthink is everywhere. It’s in school, companies, fashion and religions places. The benefit from groupthinks in these places to share ideas and to know what everyone thinks about. People who like to sit in group for example, in school or in meeting to solve a problem or to share ideas about some homework or brainstorming, Groupthink will be the best idea for that. Not only in school or company business, but also in fashion and artistic, now many of them like…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 6 Study Questions

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The process of groupthink is when one feels that membership in a particular group is important, the individual may allow the group to pressure them into pushing one’s own values aside and rationalize or…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Group decision making can be very helpful in getting different thoughts and opinions out of discussion, but also can be dangerous because of groupthink. Groupthink occurs when people avoid individually testing, analyzing, and evaluating facts in order to avoid upsetting the consensus of a group. In effect a conflict occurs whereby some topics are okay to discuss while others are closed often without the group being consciously aware of it. Those who violate the unspoken rules often find themselves being ostracized, alienated and ultimately expelled from the group.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The negative production of this type of Group Think can be confirmed through the Milgram Obedience study. This test was a series of social psychology experiments organized by psychologist Stanley Milgram that measured the willingness of participants to obey an authority figure that directed them to execute acts conflicting with their conscience. In the study, the experimenter orders the teacher (the subject of the experiment) to give painful electric shocks to a learner, who is actually an actor/tape. The teacher believes that for every wrong answer, the learner was undergoing painful electric shocks, although there were no real punishments. After a number of voltage shocks, the actor starts to pretend to be in extreme pain as he bangs on the wall that separates him from the teacher/subject.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One “groupthink” organization consists of U.S. military advisors. These advisors believe many United States’ prominent important locations will never be compromised: leaving the locations vulnerable. This could be fixed by bringing outside specialists, who are not bias, into the decision-making process. With unbiased specialists, come more opinions and light will be shown on the areas that the advisors thought could be dismissed. Another way is emphasizing keeping ones’ opinion to themselves until all others have spoken theirs. “Groupthinkers” think this way because they would rather avoid conflict than carefully think of all alternatives.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groupthink is a form of a phenomenon characterized by members of a group choosing to evaluate consensus and conformity and preservation of the group above other values. In the example of Pennsylvania State University football assistant coach Jerry Sandusky abused children. While Sandusky colleague’s choses to protect him rather than doom Penn State image and program. The decision was based primarily on how group members will react rather than what was at the ethical or professional. Primary groups are very important because they leave a long lasting influence on how we develop our social selves. Charles Horton Cooley said that we belong to primary groups because this groups offers use fulfillment of personal needs of belonging.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to study.com website (2015), a groupthink can simply be defined as an occurrence that gives a group of people a fault verdict or a conclusion a that a group has made that is an ineffective decision whereby it was reached just to appease the spirit of harmony among group members than allowing individuals to act independently and creatively. As alluded on, groupthink blocks individual creativity by ignoring alternatives allowing irrational actions to tale precedence. It happens most when individuals have similar background and the group is refusing external opinions. The result are that the decisions are flawed and they often come at a cost.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bcom 230 Dq

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The term group think is a negative form of group decision-making event. It influences members in a group to base decision-making on bringing harmony to the group rather than making realistic decisions to bring forth issues to the table. As members of a group, we…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The five bases of power are coercive power, reward power, legitimate power, expert power, and referent power. Three of these powers are formal powers and two of these powers are personal powers. The three types of formal power are coercive, reward, and legitimate power. Coercive power is dependent upon fear of negative results. Reward power is dependent upon positive rewards or benefits. Legitimate power is dependent upon a person’s structural position or ranking position in an organization. The two types of personal power are expert power and referent power. Expert power is based upon one’s experience and knowledge of a skill or trade. Referent power is based upon one’s personal traits and likeable resources. Personal bases of power seem to be more effective in the workplace structure because they are “positively related to employees’ satisfaction with supervision, their organizational commitment, and their performance” (Robbins & Judge, 2009). These bases of power affect communication in the Colstrip Electric organization tremendously. There are 10 people in the same office as me, and all of them use different bases of power to accomplish their duties. Some of my coworkers are more successful because their use of the bases of power is more effective.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groupthink Examples

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I have always had a different idea of what groupthink really means, to me I thought of it as a bad idea from someone amongst a group of people that had not been voiced seemingly because the person having this thought lacks confidence or backing. More like trying to proof to your business partners that an idea of using an outdated tactic to target a young crowd is not the best idea In its own definition Wikipedia(2013) describes groupthink as a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people, in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an incorrect or deviant decision- making outcome, whereas it can also be viewed as the practice of thinking or making decisions as a group…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Personal power comes from an individual’s unique characteristics. You don’t have to have a formal position in an organization to have this power. Two bases of personal power are…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When debating on a topic or pacific subject I prefer to debate one on one, but that is not the only way debating is done it is also done in groups and this can be a benefit in some situations and can also be a problem in some cases. When having a group debate it gives you a broad approach with having more than two people opinion, it’s going to be a harder fight, but you will get more than one standpoint on the argument. A group debate also provides diversity amongst the topic, the argument should still be based on facts and proven research but will also be debated different due to different peoples approach. Another benefit that I can see with a group debate may be strength in numbers if the group is one sided on the debate they can outnumber the opponent and win the argument they can also help brain storm and recognize different weaknesses in the opposing argument. This strength in numbers can be both a benefit and a drawback it just depends on what side of the argument you are on. I have never been in a group debate but I have seen a few on T.V. and from what I have seen it is hard to get your thoughts completed before someone is trying to respond to what you just said and when trying to wait for someone to finish their thought you may forget what you wanted to rebuttal or someone else may jump in front of you and now you have more than one comment that you want to respond to. When dealing with groups it’s a lot to process at one time and you have to be on your toes because you have more than one opponent coming at you. There seem to be an equal number of benefits as drawbacks in group debates I also think that the topic is a factor if it is a broad topic then it should be for a group debate and if it is for a narrow topic then it should be one on one.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groupthink is when the majority of people in a group have the same idea and someone one with a different opinion feels like they must be wrong rather than the whole group. They then follow the group unquestioningly. (Sociology and Social Psych Concepts) In Germany at this time, there was a large quantity of people who agreed with what Hitler said, which made the people who didn’t feel outcast. They would then join the group because they “must be wrong” if they are the only one. Although some people felt like they should help the Jews, the thought of being different from the majority scared them ,so they remained silent.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Facts About Groupthink

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. In my experience, I found that decision-making groups do not tend toward groupthink. Groupthink is a mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members’ striving for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action. Groups displaying most of the symptoms of groupthink are more likely to display symptoms ofdefective decision making, resulting in poor policy outcomes. There are seven ways to prevent this:…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to minimize conflict, Grayson Global, Inc. introduced “Groupthink which is a type of thinking that occurs when a group strives to minimize conflict, maximize cohesiveness, and reach a consensus without critically testing, analyzing and evaluating ideas” (Beebe & Masterson, 2012). This system has proven to have avoided conflicts, but just like anything else, it’s the individuals…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays