Preview

Gerald Scarpelli Case Summary

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
886 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gerald Scarpelli Case Summary
Gerald Scarpelli, pleaded guilty in July 1965, to a charge of armed robbery in Wisconsin. The trial judge sentenced him to 15 years' imprisonment, but suspended the sentence and placed him on probation for seven years in the custody of the Wisconsin Department of Public Welfare. At that time, he signed an agreement specifying the terms of his probation and a "Travel Permit and Agreement to Return" allowing him to reside in Illinois, with supervision there under an interstate compact. On August 5, 1965, the Adult Probation Department of Cook County, Illinois, accepted him for supervision.

On August 6, Illinois police, who had surprised him (Scarpelli) and one Fred Kleckner Jr., in the course of the burglary of a house, apprehended Gerald Scarpelli. After being told of his constitutional rights, respondent admitted that he and Kleckner had broken into the house for stealing merchandise or money, although he now asserts that his statement was made under duress and
…show more content…
Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972). There we held that the revocation of parole is not a part of a criminal prosecution. "Parole arises after the end of the criminal prosecution, including imposition of sentence. . . . Revocation deprives an individual, not of the absolute liberty to which every citizen is entitled, but only of the conditional liberty properly dependent on observance of special parole restrictions." Even though the revocation of parole is not a part of the criminal prosecution, we held that the loss of liberty entailed is a serious deprivation requiring that the parolee be remitted due process. Specifically, we held that a parolee is entitled to two hearings, one a preliminary hearing at the time of his arrest and detention to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that he has committed a violation of his parole, and the other a somewhat more comprehensive hearing prior to the making of the final revocation

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The action of the police officers were completely wrong, both legally and morally. The officers violated Antonio Richard Rochin’s 4th, 14th and 5th Amendment rights. The officers never obtained a warrant to enter and search Rochin’s residence; therefore, making any evidence discovered inadmissible in court. In addition they violated Rochin’s 4th Amendment rights, and no one should have their home broken into by those who’s jobs are supposed to protect us based on some hearsay evidence. It would be understandable if these officers had enough evidence to create probable cause to create enough reasonable suspicion to get a warrant before searching Rochin’s house. Instead the officers chose to take the law into their own hands by “jumping…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While Officer Harrell stood outside of room #337, I conducted a door knock at room #339. I knocked on the door and Witness Scott Anthony Eastman answered it. I asked Eastman if he heard anything unusual coming…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case 8 H&P Gerald Edwards

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: This is a 53-year-old black individual a patient of Dr. Shelton, who has had diabetes for at least six months, but he thinks it has been longer than that. He says his last known blood sugar was in the 300’s. He presents in the ER today with a foot ulcer since January of this year. He stated that it started with blisters where he had soaked his feet too long in hot water. He has had no eye examination for two years. There has been no surveillance of chronic complications of diabetes.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case I like to identify is one that involves Tulsa Police Officer Marvin Blades. The case describes a Tulsa Police Officer that was arrested on August 25 2012. He was charged with five counts of second degree robbery that occurred from August 9th 2011 to August 24th 2012.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jenelle Evans' ex-husband, Courtland Rogers, was arrested and jailed again on Friday, November 20 in Burnswick County, North Carolina.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Substantive Facts: Respondent was arrested on the night of January 12, 1975 for the robbery of Providence cab driver John Mulvaney, which lead to his murder. Mulvaney was shot in the head with a sawed-off shotgun, however no weapon was found present on the respondent at the time of his arrest. Upon the respondents’ arrest, respondent was informed of his Miranda rights by three police officers, to which he explained he understood those rights and wanted to speak with a lawyer. Officers then placed the respondent in the rear of a squad car containing the three aforementioned officers, one of which was seated in the rear with the defendant. Once en route to the police station, the officers began…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In regards to the Cagnon case, a rule of law was established that not only afforded probationers their due process rights, but ensured those rights. The law states that if they were alleged to be in violation of the stipulations of their probation, which had been so ordered by the courts, they must be given the right to present their case at a revocation hearing before being incarcerated. In fact the probationer is given dates for two separate hearings; first they are granted a “preliminary hearing”, called a "pre-revocation hearing", or “Gagnon I hearing”, which determines whether they must be incarcerated while awaiting an actual second hearing, which is called the “revocation hearing” or “Gagnon II hearing” (Latessa and Smith 2011). It is possible that they can be released while awaiting the second…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gagnon I Hearing Analysis

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In just a year period, the United States Supreme Court issued rulings in Morrissey v. Brewer and Gagnon v. Scarpelli (O’Leary & Hanrahan, 1978). These cases set a precedence on how the process for depriving liberty for those on probation or parole (O’Leary & Hanrahan, 1978). It ultimately created the two-part hearing process, which is know as Gagnon I and Gagnon II hearings (O’Leary & Hanrahan, 1978).…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mempa V. Rhay

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The defendant filed another writ of habeas corpus in the State Supreme Court claiming that he had been denied the right to counsel, the Supreme Court stated that "any indigent is entitled at every stage of a criminal proceeding to be represented by court-appointed counsel, where substantial rights of a criminal accused may be affected." Moreover, the Supreme Court considered the legal interests of the probationers and decided that a probation revocation hearing constituted a "critical stage" which dictated adherence to due process protections.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 4 Assignment

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Doe is an individual that left his country in an effort to make a better life. However, he does not have legal status in America and was recently arrested for shoplifting merchandise, which was valued over $1,000. At the time of his arrest, John voluntarily began to make incriminating statements to the arresting officers. At the police station, detectives conducted an interview of John asking him about the theft. John Doe has had no prior arrests, is 35 years old, and most of John Doe’s family still resides in his home country. Due to the amount of money involved, the crime is deemed a felony and John was arrested and placed in the county jail in Toms River, NJ. He is going to face the judge in the Ocean County Superior Court; however, he has no money for bail.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parole is an early release from prison that is determined by the Department of Pardons and Parole, based on good conduct. Usually, a person on parole is released under the Supervision of a parole officer. The inmate will remain on Parole until…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Felons Have Right to Vote

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    removal of their rights while in prison. The completion of a felon serving out their sentence in…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Abandon Parole

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages

    PAROLE SHOULD BE ABOLISHED The procedure known as "parole" in the criminal justice system has been in practice in the United States since the late 1800's when it was begun in a reformatory in Elmira, New York. It's process provides for early conditional release from prison for convicted felons, after part of their prison sentence has been served, and they are found to be eligible for parole based on factors such as: conduct while incarcerated, rehabilitative efforts/progress, type of offense, and remorse for their crime. Its use has been expanded to many states, and today has become the primary way by which offenders are released from prisons and correctional institutions. Unfortunately, parole is not always rewarded to worthy inmates, thus putting society at risk for repeated crimes that often outweigh the benefits of parole, therefore, parole should be abolished and inmates should be made to complete their full sentences. Prison inmates are usually sentenced by the severity of their crimes, as well as their mental intention at the time of the act. For example: a person who commits murder intentionally expects to take the life of another in reckless disregard for human life, and knows that the act itself which he or she has decided to commit, will surely bring about death. However, in the case of manslaughter, which is also the taking of a human life, there is no actual intention to bring about death. The act that lead to someone's death, is measured by the circumstances that made the person kill such as self-defense, or a crime of passion because the killer was provoked in such a way that a chain of events lead to violence which eventually resulted in peril. Because of the difference in how these crimes are carried out, inmates are sentenced differently; some are sentenced to life in prison, and others are sentenced to several years and will be eligible for parole after serving part of their sentence. In lieu of inmates completing their full sentences, parole…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parole, in criminal law, pledge of good conduct given by a person convicted of crime as a condition of release from imprisonment before the expiration of the term of confinement. The word parole is also broadly used to denote such a conditional release or period of liberty. Parole is usually granted to a prisoner in recognition of past good conduct, both in prison and earlier. A sentenced criminal may be released on parole before the maximum limit of the prison term has been reached, either on the expiration of the minimum term or of some other shorter term fixed by statute on condition of good behavior. The release in such case is not an absolute discharge, such as that received as a matter of right on the expiration of the full term, but is conditional on the due performance of the parolee's pledge. During the same parole period the parolee is required to report from time to time to prison authorities or to a parole agent or parole officer to whose custody he or she was assigned when released. Other stipulations of parole include avoiding association with known criminals and remaining within a certain locality. For a violation of parole within the time limit, the parolee is liable to be apprehended and returned to prison to serve out the full or maximum term.…

    • 2546 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: After an investigation revealed substantial evidence that Steiney Richards was involved in dealing drugs from hotel rooms in Madison, Wisconsin, the police obtained a search warrant for Richards’ hotel room on December 31, 1991. Officer’s arrived at the hotel room at 3:40 A.M. with at least one uniformed officer and several other plain clothes officers. When Officer Pharo, dressed as a maintenance man knocked on the door and announced he was maintenance Richards opened the chained door. Upon seeing the uniformed officer standing behind Officer Pharo, Richards slammed the door and retreated into the hotel room. The…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays