Preview

Genghis Khan and Qin Shi Huang

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
697 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Genghis Khan and Qin Shi Huang
Zhen Zou
History is an amazing thing, which can let us harvest experience, which can make us look back at the past, which can get us to compare with now. You can also find some incredible coincidences. However, there were some differences in these coincidences. In old China, there were two great emperors who both unified ChinaQin Shi Huang and Genghis Khan. As founders of Dynasties, they were powerful leaders, military geniuses and brutal rulers. But, Genghis Khan paid more attention to wars and the expansion of territory, and Qin Shi Huang unified the currency, word and measures while establishing centralization.
People widely recognized that even though Genghis Khan, whose military talent was strong, was very cruel. According to history, Genghis Khan conquered huge parts of central Asia and China. Genghis Khan’s first war, fought in 1193, when with 6,000 men he defeated the army of his father-in-law, Ung Khan, under Sankun, 10,000 strong, surprising them in a narrow pass, and inflicting heavy loss upon them. However, although all battles of Genghis Khan’s demonstrated his military talent, his cruel killing cannot be ignored. According to Giovanni de Plano Carpini, who was the Pope’s envoy the Mongol Great Khan and traveled through Kiev in February 1246, maintained that the Mongols attacked Russia, where they made great damage, undermining cities and fortresses and slaughtering men. After they had besieged Kiev where the capital of Russia was for a long time, they killed all of the inhabitants in Kiev. (Clark, 2012) There were countless skulls and bones of dead men lying about on the ground. This is why it is known that Genghis Khan was brutal. Nevertheless, Genghis Khan conquered the size of the land, but he did not know how to govern it. Fortunately, he had a great consultant – Yelü Chucai, whom Genghis Khan appointed as prime minister to help him effectively manage his country. If he had not had this consultant, his country could not have been so stable.



Cited: Edwards, Mike. “Lord of the Mongols.” ngm.nationalgeographic.com. http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/1996/12/genghis-khan/edwards-text#close-modal. Dec. 1996. Clark, Josh. “Did Genghis Khan really kill 1,748,000 people in one hour?” history.howstuffworks.com. http://history.howstuffworks.com/history-vs-myth/genghis-khan-murder.htm. Nov. 2012. Szczepanski, Kallie. “Qin Shi Huang, First Emperor of China.” About.com. http://asianhistory.about.com/od/profilesofasianleaders/p/qinshihungbio.htm.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Genghis Khan’s first serious target was North China, their army of 200,000 rode east. Numerous cities felt Mongol brutality. Slaughter was so great, streets were greasy of human fat and flesh.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mongol leaders also contributed greatly to their success. Khan (known as Great Khan), the very powerful military leader, didn’t tolerate the defiance of others “if you do not obey the command of Heaven, and run counter to our orders we shall know that you are our foe,” (Doc: 9). This statement is a response to the Pope, another powerful leader. The Pope recognizes the force which Khan is using “with a fury still unabated you do not cease from breaking the bonds of natural ties, sparing neither sex nor age, you rage against all indiscriminately with the sword of chastisement” (Doc: 8). This reestablishes the brutal force that Khan is using to benefit himself by leaving no survivors to spread information or become his enemies. Chinggis Khan was also a brutal leader, “he sent soldiers out against those of…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From 206 B.C.E. - 220 C.E., the Han dynasty, in China, accumulated many political control methods, as did Imperial Rome reigning from 31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E. However, there were more differences than similarities between the two empires/dynasties. Two main differences were China and Rome’s territorial expansion and their political philosophies (mandate of heaven and monarchy). A similarity between these two empires would be their centralized government adopting bureaucracy.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early thirteenth century Chinggis Khan and his following successors helped forge various tribes in to a powerful alliance that built the largest empire the world has ever seen. The Mongolian empire reached great in size in such a short period of time. This was basically because of the sturdy Mongol army and many efficient policies the Khan family established. The Mongols were very knowledgeable in military tactics. There empire had a strong sense of unity, helping the empire get so great so rapidly. There allies also contributed to the Mongolian empire. By the time of Chinggis Khan's death in 1227, he had laid the foundation of a vast and mighty empire, which continued to grow with his tactics set in stone.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the Mongolian armies of the Golden Horde started to move west, by the 13th century, Kiev was in a period of decline and Russia was divided into small kingdoms. These Russian kingdoms were unable to unite and create a large army before the Mongols came to attack and conquer their land. Batu, Chinggis Khan’s grandson, invaded in 1236 and defeated Russian armies (after being taken over, the Russians became vassals of the Khan of the Golden Horde). Also the Mongols were mostly negative, Mongol occupation was important to Russia. This is shown through the influence of military and political organization. But most importantly, the Mongols isolated Russia from developments in western European civilization; like the Renaissance and the…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    China Athens DBQ

    • 1196 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Fathers cover up for their sons, and sons cover up for their fathers…” Confucius on the Individual and State. Soon after the time of Confucius, two incredible civilizations rose: classical Athens in the West, and Han China in the East. In Classical Athens, around 470- 430 BCE, they had the first democratic government, the basis for the political systems of many powerful countries today. In the East, around 202 BCE- 220 CE the people of Han China accomplished great architectural projects such as the Great Wall of China, and the Terracotta Army. These two civilizations had two very different mindsets. In Athens they focused on what the individual could do to show loyalty to the city, while in China they focused more on loyalty to the family. Therefore, Han China had the better civilization because they held respect for their elders in higher regard than politics; they had the more efficient political system; and they respected nature and recognized that the Earth controlled them.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anonymous monks in Novgorod, Russia recorded the event of a Mongol invasion and the horrors that came with it, writing “They likewise killed the Knyaz and the Knyaginya, and men, women, and children, monks, nuns and priests, some by fire, some by sword, and violated nuns, priests’ wives, good women and girls in the presence of their mothers and sisters… And we, indeed, having seen it, were terrified and wept with sighing day and night over our sins…”. We can probably count this source as reliable because it was written by Monks, and it is in their religion, which by they live their life that they should not lie. In a letter to the Great Khan from Pope Innocent IV, another religious source, he writes “and with a fury still unabated you do not cease from braking the bonds of natural ties, sparing neither sex nor age, you rage against all indiscriminately with the sword of chastisement.”. His tone is almost accusatory, but there is fear and disbelief at what the Great Khan has done. We cannot mark this source as reliable, however, because in his letter he writes “according to what we have heard”, and therefore has not witnessed anything he is accusing the Khan…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mongols began to rise to power under the great Genghis Khan, and during the 13th century they created the largest empire in history. The Mongols during the 1300s were very known, and feared by many, it was almost rare to find areas that hadn’t heard of the Mongols. These “barbarians” ruled over many areas, expanded across almost all of Asia; and killed millions of people wherever they went. Mongols ruthlessly slaughtered many people, and used many tactics to ensure their victory. The Mongols…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Mongols Barbarians

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    All though you can’t deny some of the deeds the Mongols have done. For example during war the Mongols would, “take the fat of the people they kill and, melting it and catapult it on to the houses.”(Document 3,Dawson) But this wasn't just so they could “drench the battle field in their enemies remains.” The same source also said, “wherever the fire falls on this fat it is almost inextinguishable.” (Document 3, Dawson) It was just yet another effective battle…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During his reign as emperor, Genghis Khan killed and ravaged many civilizations and villages, “He was responsible for the deaths of as many as 40 million people.” The amount of people that he is responsible for killing is inconceivable. Genghis Khan would destroy civilizations beyond repair. He wouldn’t leave a single survivor. Genghis Khan took pride in destroying his enemies. He once said, "The greatest happiness is to scatter your enemy, to drive him before you, to see his cities reduced to ashes, to see those who love him shrouded in tears, and to gather into your bosom his wives and daughters." He would not be satisfied with just defeating them in battle. He needed to make it so they could not come back from it. He took joy in truly wrecking all that his opponents stood for. He wanted to see them suffer. After Genghis Khan would destroy a village, “No living thing was spared, including small domestic animals and livestock. Skulls of men, women, and children were piled in large, pyramidal mounds.” He did not care if you were a child, he would kill you. It did not matter if you had wronged him or if you did nothing wrong. He did not even care if you could benefit him, he went to extreme measures to make an example. In order to prove a point, “Temujin's Mongols then defeated the Taichi'ut using a series of massive cavalry attacks, including having all of the Taichi'ut chiefs boiled alive.” Temujin, another name Genghis Khan, would go to extreme lengths to assert his dominance. He would use smart military tactics, and then use barbaric ways to finish them off. This would be his way of sending the message, don’t test…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mongol Empire Dbq

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Document 1 shows that Genghis Khan, a Mongolian leader, conquered 4,860,000 square miles of land. Genghis Khan also made sure that every soldier had someone in charge of them, allowing no room for mistakes. He organized the army in a way that every ten people had a ¨captain of ten¨ and every 10 of these captains had a ¨captain of a hundred¨ and so on (Doc 2). If they did not obey one of their leaders or tried to run away, they would be killed (Doc 2). This shows how the leader did not allow any room for disorder and showed no mercy for even his own army. Document 5 shows the Mongolian leader, Genghis Khan, in action executing a prisoner. He and his soldiers were so Barbaric, they would execute on spot and burn people alive while hanging upside down. Genghis was very strict and forbidded theft and adultery of Mongols. They would not even steal two horses running astray with the owners already moved out of the country because of how strict the laws were on theft (Doc 7). Mongke Khan, also a Mongolian leader, made his profession to of faith to Rubruck and declared that all Mongols believe there is one God (Doc 9). In document 10 about Adultery, it shows again how Genghis Khan was strict on is policies of committing adultery, which says they will be executed if they have had previous convictions or…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mongols as Villians

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Genghis Khan was loved mostly by peasants and the poor solely because he was able to give them more riches. He treated them very well. Because the majority of people in that time period were poor, he was loved more than he was hated. The rich hated him because he took their money and other riches for his own profit. Genghis Khan’s army of Mongols was greatly known for their advanced abilities in archery. They were also successful in biological warfare during the Siege of Caffa in 1346 were they catapulted dead plague ridden bodies of animals and human over their borders. In the 12th and 13th centuries, Mongols were known for boiling defeated khans rather than killing them by swords. This was known as one of the most cruel and most painful ways to die.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Mongols had conquered many areas, one being Russia. In 1236, Batu, one of Ghenggis Khan’s grandsons, led a Mongol force of 120,000 cavalrymen into the Russian heartlands. “The crushing victories of Batu's armies initiated nearly two and one-half centuries of Mongol dominance in Russia” (Stearns 1992). The Mongols had successfully influenced the Russians politically and politically during their domination. However, even years after the fall of the Mongols, they were still able to have an impact on Russia.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genghis Khan Thesis

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World is a systematic history of one the world's greatest leaders and empires. It abolishes misconceptions about the Mongol Empire and challenges Eurocentric ideas of history. It dispels the innate stereotype that Genghis Khan and the Mongols were bloodthirsty barbarians and show them in a new light as the truly innovative fighters and just, progressive leaders they were. Although he came from humble beginnings, the son of a kidnapped woman and raised in a yurt. Genghis Khan gained power…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. King And Lao-Tzu

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages

    King and Lao-Tzu both had the same views but different actions. Their views consisted of eagerly wanting the world to become a better place. They wanted equal rights and righteous leaders. Their believes did not consist of taking sides. To them what really mattered was to have everyone be equally content. Even though King and Lao-tzu did not ever meet, there is thought to be a possibility that Dr. King could have read Lao-tzu’s writting. Thus they both believed in equality without violence.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays