Genetic Modification Essay

Gene Modification From a Libertarian Perspective
Over many years, the idea of genetically modifying human embryos has been an extremely controversial topic. A global network of stem cell researchers named Hixton Group released a statement claiming that genetic modification is essential to gain basic understanding of the biology of early embryos. Being able to modify and study embryos would bring tremendous value to science. Although the group didn’t particularly encourage changing embryos for personal reasons, they strongly believe that when all safety, efficacy and governance needs are met it is acceptable to practice genetic modification. This is a complicated topic to many because changing the way a human is being naturally born, and adjusting features and characteristics of the human body to suit a personal desire is seen as malicious. Certain people believe that it is inhumane to tamper with a fetus for the pleasure of yourself, but others see no fault in having the opportunity to be able to do this if wanted or needed Stem cell researchers and bioethicists have been trying for ages to be able to research the human germ line in human embryos, but since the thought of the modification is seen collectively as criminal, the United States National Institute of Health (which make the funds for biomedical research) declines all offers to contribute money for any use of gene editing technologies in human embryos.
I will discuss that a Libertarian would be acceptable of this situation being done if they personally feel like they would benefit from it in the long run. Libertarians would use this example, like anything else that gives you an opportunity to act on your free will and make choices independently. Although it may seem harsh, if libertarians are given the option and feel that they want to, they would act on what they are telling themselves to