Preview

Generosity and Miserliness

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
424 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Generosity and Miserliness
Machiavelli writes in The Qualities of the Prince, that it is better to be a miser and slightly disliked for a while than to be generous and be liked for a while than hated. If you're a generous prince you can only be so for a short time before having to raise taxes and having people realize that you're not that generous in all reality. Once a prince gets a reputation for being hated he will feel any slight unrest of his people. On the other hand if a prince is miserly from the get go he will be received gratefully when he decides to be generous. Using this quality of miserliness he has the ability to expand and defend his kingdom and be ready for any unforeseen events without having to burden his people, which, in turn leads to economic growth. Generosity done openly runs the risk of making the prince broke; a broke prince will have to raise his taxes in order to keep up his reputation for being generous. This tax raise will affect all but only benefit a few which, in turn, will ruin the prince by having him become hated by most of his subjects. The hatred that occurs from this will soon lead to an overthrowing/assassination of the prince if he doesn't soon change his ways. If the prince does abruptly chance his ways and becomes a miser; his subjects that benefited from his generosity will grow restless and the ones that didn't will despise the prince more.
Vanover 2 Machiavelli writes, "…it is very necessary to be thought generous." This statement is one of Machiavelli's reoccurring themes throughout the book of appearance vs. reality; the prince needs to have everyone think he is very generous, which they will, when in fact he is being very stingy. His subjects won't realize it because they are not burdened with taxes and can use their money for other things which will help bolster the economy.
Miserliness will be looked down upon at first for the prince but soon his subjects will come to appreciate the prince's miserliness, his ability to expand the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There is a well-known saying that says “nice guys finish last”. This saying is somewhat equivalent to a modern version of Machiavelli's statement. What Machiavelli is attempting to say is that there are so many people who do not do good, that when there is one person that tries to do good that person will most likely not succeed. This is due to everybody else will maybe try to take advantage of that person. When taking about generosity and miserliness, Machiavelli says that generosity “will not be recognized and you will not avoid the reproach of its opposite.” (Par. 9). This means that people will take you for granted when you are generous. When you stop giving, people will notice and they will disapprove of you. It is the sad reality that people face today. Whenever someone is nice all the time and always there for anyone who needs help, although that person might be thanked for it, they are not actually taken into consideration. However, if for a particular reason that person is not able to lend their help, people might receive that the wrong way and they will remember that displeasing time more than the other times when they received help.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If a Prince rules liberally, he will be given a good reputation, but it can hurt you in the long run. Just having a good reputation won’t help out the people. It’s better to have a bad reputation and govern the right way, than to have a good reputation and destroy your land. A government should also be ran on the greediness of money and supplies. A ruler must always be rapacious with money. If he needs to spend a lot of money for something, he won’t have to tax the people even more than they already are. “…had not moderated his expenses, he would have destroyed his government.” “Nothing wastes so rapidly as liberality.” (Machiavelli 187) Machiavelli also wrote that to be a great leader, one must know how to be cruel to his subjects. If the Prince’s people feared him, then they would obey him rather than if they didn’t. If they didn’t fear him they may think that they can overpower him and rebel. “…it is much safer to be feared than loved” (Machiavelli…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although if one were to look back to Machiavelli’s book, The Prince, they would notice how…

    • 709 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli's The Prince, hints of future democratic theories can be pulled out of Machiavelli's plan for the success of a prince of a state. Within Machiavelli's concentration of plotting out successful achievement of a stabilized state within a principality, he often reveals the importance of the satisfaction the people within the governing walls of that principality. One of the themes to Machiavelli's plan included the dismissal of the affection of virtue of the nobility as well as the significance of an honest people. Even though Machiavelli may have had other motivation for the writing of "The Prince",…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prince may gain power, but not glory. He gains esteem and glory through his courage. He must have wisdom to choose the least risky venture and act on it courageously and wisdom in picking his advisors. It is extremely important to gain the support of the people because you will need it in times of trouble. It also takes that same courage and wisdom to keep up the morale of his people during those troubled times. That is why a prince needs to relate to his people. He does not have to be loved by the people, but he must not be hated and should always be respected. However, Machiavelli makes a powerful case that it is better for a leader to be feared than loved. He feels that men respond more strongly to fear than love. Fear is constant, but love of the people can easily change. The prince cannot make people love him, but he has control over his people’s fear of him. Therefore, the course of action that the prince can best control is what he should pursue. In answering the question of whether it is better to be loved than feared, Machiavelli writes, “The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson Vs Machiavelli

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Machiavelli "viewed misery as one of the vices that enables a prince to rule" (Machiavelli's Beliefs par.7). He believe it was better to be considered miserly rather than generous, because a generous reputation creates a standard that one must achieve and a greater disappointment if they don't. If the leader is very generous all the time the citizens get used to that and wont appreciate it as much anymore. Therefore, he advises the "princes to avoid the values of justice, mercy, temperance, wisdom and love of their people in preference to the use of cruelty, violence, fear and deception," (par.8). Opposed to how a true leader should be, Machiavelli believes that one must be over aggressive in order to be obeyed. However, Andrew Jackson participated in many generous acts. Especially when he passed the abolishment of tariffs act. Tariffs were a tax on imported goods, placed in order to keep the Norths manufacturing in business, since it was competing with cheaper European products. The South argued that it was unconstitutional, so Jackson reduced the tariffs significantly low. He was always willing to be generous when it came to the common people. I understand how Machiavelli would think a miserly reputation would be easier and better suited for a prince because that makes every good deed more appreciated since its not expected of…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Price describes how the ruler should gain, maintain, and increase political power. Machiavelli’s study and beliefs on human nature led him to make noteworthy political statements for the time. Key concepts discussed in The Prince include the fact that a politician should manipulate the people and use any means to gain power. Machiavelli also noted that the prince should combine the cunning of a fox with the ferocity of a lion to achieve his goals, and sometimes would have to put aside his morals when making political decisions. Furthermore, Machiavelli believed that it was desirable for a leader to be both feared and love; but it is difficult to be both at the same time, and it is much safer to be feared than to be loved. Fifteenth century rulers, by part of Renaissance humanism, began the process of order through centralization of power. The rulers employed the aggressive methods implied by the political ideas of the Renaissance to rebuild their governments. Beginning first in Italy, then in France, Spain, and England, the result was the rise of numerous powerful and unforgiving rulers with a common goal in mind: the centralization of power and the abolishment of disorder and violence. The “new monarchs”, Louis XI of France, Henry VII of England, and Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain, were tough, cynical, and calculation ruler and seemed to be abiding by Machiavelli’s…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli intended The Prince to serve as a guide to creating and holding on to a principality. In it, he also characterizes a "good" society and the necessary tools for building one. Although Machiavelli conceives the republic as being the most practical form of government, he reasons that it is still possible to create a good society under a monarchy, as long as the leader of the monarchy follows the stipulated guidelines. Machiavelli realized that humans are predisposed to act perniciously and therefore it is the responsibility of the prince to exploit that nature in a way that will benefit society as a whole. In this way, Machiavelli's prince is an ideal crafted from the actual, rather than an actual crafted from the ideal.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Prince tells readers how to use power correctly; it also tells readers how to sustain the kingdom’s power and prevent the kingdom’s decay. More specifically, Machiavelli tells readers that what kind of personality and morality a successful prince should have. The Prince…

    • 1760 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    3.07a Edgar Allan Poe

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This allusion shows an end to the prince because it was very greedy of him to ignore his people while he had a good…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Giver Altruism

    • 2000 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A civil rights activist named Martin Luther King Jr. once declared “He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it.” King contemplates the issue of those who choose to condone the evil and injustice they see in the world, stating that those who grow complacent with the evil are comparable to those who cause the evil themselves. He condemns those who stand passively as others are mistreated or taken advantage of. In the same vein, an Irish salesman by the name of Edmund Burke proclaimed “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”…

    • 2000 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Machiavelli had an extraordinarily way of showing his perspective. “…I know that everyone will admit that it would be a very praiseworthy thing to find a prince, of the qualities mentioned above, those that are held to be good…” This meant that in Machiavelli’s perspective, it would’ve been the best thing for the prince, to be all of the qualities he had mentioned. “…I say that it would be good to be considered…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George W. Bush, our current President, must keep a copy of Machiavelli’s most celebrated work, “The Prince “(1513), on his desk in the Oval Office. In my opinion, Bush and his administration’s actions mimic Machiavelli’s advice to the Prince on the tactics that he should use to stay in power. I am going to discuss how President Bush uses Machiavellian principles.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Definition Of Generosity

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What is generosity? To some, it's giving more than you have to individuals that might need it more than you do. To others, it's trying to make people smile, or make someone's day a little bit brighter. Being generous does not mean that you have to give money, sometimes you just have to give time and attention. Every person has a different definition of what it means. Anne Frank states that "No one has ever become poor by giving." Is that because being generous makes your heart feel rich? Frank A. Clark says "Real generosity is doing something nice for someone who will never notice." If no one ever acknowledges when someone does a considerate deed for them, why does generosity spread? In this day and age, people broadcast…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays