Preview

From A Christian Perspective Why Did Communism Fail

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
395 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
From A Christian Perspective Why Did Communism Fail
ECON 214- D03
Christian Ethics Project 2
1. From a Christian perspective, why did Marxist communism fail?

From a Christian perspective, Marxist communism failed because of the atheistic qualities. Marxist communism didn’t allow people to practice their religious beliefs. Marx’s social system also wouldn’t allow people to take home their own earnings, making everyone have the same earnings, wiping out inequality (Stapleford, 2009, p. 62). “The weakening of property rights for the rich or the talented also endangers the property right of the remainder of society and undermines economic growth” (Stapleford, 2009, p. 62). The lack of economic growth is ultimately what led to Marxist communism failing.

2. Which is a more Christian form of government,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Unit5Lesson6TheColdWarBegins Drew Funk
    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Unit5Lesson6TheColdWarBegins Drew Funk

    He established that the United States would provide political, military and economic assistance to all democratic nations under threat from external or internal authoritarian forces.…

    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    From A Christian Perspective, Why Did Marxist Communism Fail?
    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From A Christian Perspective, Why Did Marxist Communism Fail?

    From a Christian perspective Marxist communism failed because it denied anything and everything about God or there even being any type of god. There was a real sense of atheistic aspects with in Marxist communism. As a Christian we know that anything without God means nothing at all and will end up failing miserably. Marxism was very controlling when it came to religious beliefs of any type. They closely monitored and control anything religious which didn’t sit well with the people and pushed people to resist the rules. According to Stapleford, “Certainly communism, except in recalcitrant Cuba and North Korea, is dead” (2009, page…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Opposing Views Of Kuyper, Marx, And Communism
    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Opposing Views Of Kuyper, Marx, And Communism

    Kuyper Perspective Although several of his augments complimentary to Kuyper’s, Marx’s methods for ending poverty are extremely different. Marx views the French Revolution as a positive event and advocates the distribution of property and the abolishment of the family structure. These radical ideas suggest that he possesses a distorted understanding of human nature. Moreover, Marx’s Communism completely disregards God’s authority and places man’s reason at the center of his worldview. Christians should abstain from embracing these ideas as they are based primarily on scientific reasoning without the support of biblical principles.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Example of Db Post
    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Example of Db Post

    1. From a Christian perspective, why did Marxist communism fail? From a Christian point of view, Marxist communism failed due to people not being offered a choice of whether or not to distribute riches to everyone. The author states: “Beginning in the Garden, God gave men and women the freedom to choose to do what is right. This is the heart of democracy” (Stapleford, 2009, p.98). Clearly, it is Godly for people to have freedom of choice; communism was not Godly and therefore, failed.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Cold War Affect The United States?
    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Did The Cold War Affect The United States?

    One of the primary principles of communist is that capitalism is characteristically awful and represented a risk to the common laborers. Meanwhile, “The capitalists believed there should be a free economy in which private individuals made most decisions” (Brookioh, 2012). The communists see every single entrepreneur country as conceivable foes. As indicated by them, capitalism will in the end crush itself and it is their obligation to help it along. They deny participation amongst themselves and capitalist countries ideologically.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Assess the View That the Main Function of Religious Belief Is to Promote Social Stability. (33 Marks)
    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess the View That the Main Function of Religious Belief Is to Promote Social Stability. (33 Marks)

    * Marxists Disagree: Religion functions serve capitalism. Karl Marx – sees religion as an ideology that is used as a weapon by the ruling class to justify suffering of poor as ‘god-given’…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Does Michael Moore Believe In Capitalism
    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Does Michael Moore Believe In Capitalism

    This sets the idea that capitalism was directly affected by religion in the past, and without religion, capitalism may not have taken over in the way it has in the modern United States.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing The Communist Manifesto: A Worker's Call To Arms
    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Comparing The Communist Manifesto: A Worker's Call To Arms

    Communism was the end result of Marx's beliefs. That you were a Marxist if you agreed with what he said and communism was what you all worked to achieve. He believed in the uniting of the working class or proletariat as a whole and that their immediate goals were "formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat." (Marx 66) to achieve these…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Compare And Contrast Hyper And Karl Marx
    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Hyper And Karl Marx

    Marx and Kuyper both strive to see a solution to poverty. Marx believes that society needs to be centralized through a government that will equally distribute capital to each person. Kuyper believes that society needs to centralize around God. Both men agree that society needs to be centralized and that the separation between the two ideas comes from their religions. “But Communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes, all religion, and all morality, instead of constituting them on a new basis: it therefore acts in contradiction to all past historical experience” (Marx, 33-34). The argument Marx makes for communism is that it erases all faith in humanity and relies on government to be the solution to the problem of poverty. Kuyper believing that the sinful nature of mankind is to blame sees the solution being in the power of the people and a reformation in religious thought. No matter the government in charge, Kuyper argues “Rules alone will not cure our sick society; the medicine must also reach the heart of rich and poor” (Kuyper,…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Age Of Ideologies: American Evangelicalism
    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Age Of Ideologies: American Evangelicalism

    Communism is a type of socialism and socialism is based around the idea of the states being owner of their means of production. Communism is based upon the ideology of Marxism. Marxism criticized Christianity by claiming that it was untrue because it took the side of the wealthy oppressors (Shelley 2008). The movement that we know as communism today was started by Vladimir Ilich Ulyanov know as Lenin. Lenin believed that violence was Marxism’s ultimate weapon (Shelley 2008). The theory that came from these two men’s ideas coming together was the Marxist-Leninist theory which claimed “Christianity is an illusory reflection of the world resulting from class divisions” (Shelley 2008). Communism was about not letting society become classless because Lenin believed that religion would take away the power of government and to him that could not…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Communism In 1930s
    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Communism In 1930s

    Communism (Marxism) swept the world in the 1900s by being an 'easy fix' for a struggling economic country. It gives everyone a job, the same things (food, money, and necessities), and most importantly: no power. (Johnson, 2005) Communism basically dehumanizes the country. No one is an individual.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Commanding Heights Essay
    • 7534 Words
    • 31 Pages

    Commanding Heights Essay

    Lenin’s hardcore Communist policies were a disaster in the USSR: Food production and industrial output virtually collapsed and the county started falling apart. He had to abandon the most extreme Communist practices early on because they just didn’t work in real life.…

    • 7534 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Christianity and It's Impact on Economics
    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Christianity and It's Impact on Economics

    Reading about Christianity, it seems that the early Christians did not believe in capitalism. In today’s society however, they support capitalism and it currently pushes our government and economy. I mean I guess if you believe strong enough in let’s say hell, then it could in a way boost the economy. This is what I am thinking. I am sure that religion reduces crime and corruption and those Christians who abide by the book probably respect the laws of the land. With that increase in respect, it could boost overall economic growth. I have gone into establishments where people have used their religious background to define their reliability. If you think about it, there are more verses on money and finance than there is about prayer in the Bible. But the New Testament has contradictions to this. It states that the rich person has little chance getting into heaven but then states the parable of the talents, which praises the servant who got the biggest return on his money. That alone could solidify why modern day Christians support capitalism. Even more so why our government is run the way it is. Religion creates bonds of trust and shared commitment among small groups, both of which is necessary qualities for lending and trade. Religion can directly affect what you earn. Some followers under Christianity have bigger families and give away more of their money. They also tend to have lower savings rate and incomes like Quakers or the Amish. With all this moving money, it is no doubt why Christians could have a huge impact on economic…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Marx And Kyper
    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Similarities Between Marx And Kyper

    Marx’s plan for reforming society may be more tangible than Kuyper’s, but his plan uses rather cruel and destructive tactics. For instance, Marx believes that the family has become an instrument of oppression and should be eliminated. Marx’s plan for consolidating the family directly contradicts biblical principles and is no less than an attempt to undermine God’s authority. Marx believes the family is merely a product of the class system and not a God ordained institution. Besides Marx’s cruel elimination of the family, his plan further feeds man’s greed and selfishness. Communism’s prohibition of private property claims to produce economic equality. However, this notion seems only to further feed man unhealthy relationship with the material world and denies God his rightful place of power. Without God’s moral authority, man is left to reshape society as he sees fit but at the cost of losing all that is good. After examining Marx argument, the idea of communism does not seem to present an effective solution for resolving poverty in either Marx’s day or in the twenty-first…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Article Summary, Why Communism, By Max Berry
    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Article Summary, Why Communism, By Max Berry

    Berry claims that communism makes people more equal. However, I strongly disagree with this. Even though it destroys the system which consists of a lower class, a middle class, and an upper class. It does not do this completely. It only takes away the middle class. As the government puts itself as the only power in charge, therefore everyone else is in the lower class. As Mr.Berry says through the communist system in which apparently " Economic boundaries don’t separate or categorize people, a situation that eliminates crime and violence." This is not true because the system which eliminates the middle class creates a strong difference between the people and the government which opens up a door for hate and aggression. Instead of actually creating " stronger social communities". Mr. Berry talks about the rules communism creates "if the citizens abide by these laws, this leads to a harmonious spirit of sharing with one goal. This consequently builds stronger social communities and an even stronger economy." But it creates even more of a difference by choosing what the society is allowed to believe in. It basically takes away the civil rights which does not lead to a harmonious spirit. For example the two most known communist leaders, Lenin and Marx view religion as something negative, they take away the personality and believes people share and destroy them and dictate what to believe in and what not. They do not only do this with religion but also with political views.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics