David Entwistle's (2010) Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity appears to be a text with a primary audience which appears to be conservative evangelical Christians. The basic ‘meat’ of the book is the premise that "weaving together perspectives from psychology and Christian theology can help us understand and appreciate humanity more fully than we could with either perspective alone" (p. 3). Entwistle’s view is that in faithful reading of both the book of God's work (nature) and the book of God's word (theology), this textbook seems to be the work of an individual whose true request is for a form of psychology that is aimed at the treatment of the total patient, mind, body and soul. "Christian understandings of personhood, the purpose of human life, our need for God, and the ethical teachings of Christian faith," Entwistle argues, "are integral to psychology, not merely parallel to it" (p. 199). By making his opinion clear throughout several sections within the text Entwistle is projecting his position on the subject of integrating theology and psychology very clear.…
Dr. Armand Nicholi in the documentary: C. S. Lewis: The Four Loves Stated, “for Lewis, true happiness could only be found in relationship with God.” (p.1) The Love that Lewis sought after could only come from God. In my humble opinion, that’s where the difference begins and ends. On the other hand Freud – the founder of psychoanalysis and an atheist could only produce the kind of love that was reciprocal. I believe that they were tied to their views on religion by their understanding of what love was to them. Lewis once believed or at least had to some degree thought like Freud. As I relate “Religion: Why Bother” I couldn’t help but think about “The Watch Out” Attitude: Religion Is Dangerous stated “Religion is both psychologically and sociologically dangerous.”…
Two research papers are required by all students in this course. Each paper should be 8–10 double-spaced pages in length, although you should consider this as a general guideline (longer papers will not be penalized, and a shorter paper, if very well done, could be an "A" quality paper). Each paper is a research paper, meaning that quality of research does impact the grade of the paper. You should plan ahead in developing a strategy for securing resources for each paper. Internet sources, while not forbidden, are generally discouraged as they are often of dubious quality. With this in mind, you should aim to use at least five quality sources for each paper, including, but not limited to, commentaries and journal articles. Papers will be graded based upon the clarity and style with which they were written, quality of research, the strength of the arguments made, and the depth of support provided through scripture. All sources should be cited through footnotes. Bible references may be cited in-text. Papers should also include a proper bibliography of all sources cited (besides the Bible, which is not considered a bibliography source). Each paper must be completed in Turabian format and using Microsoft Word.…
Freud places emphasis on the power of the individual versus the power of civilization as a whole in his book Civilization and Its Discontents, an emphasis that is clearly replicated in both 1984 and Panopticon. Freud states, “Human life in common is only made possible when a majority comes together which is stronger than any separate individual and which remains united against all separate individuals” (46). This particular sentiment is echoed in the theory of the panopticon as tool to suppress the imprisoned individual, illustrated through the guard tower placed in the center of the prison that does not allow for inmates to decipher whether there is anyone inside watching them; an illusion that is intended to demonstrate the power of the panopticon…
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and when it comes to the television series, Family Guy, everyone does. A person either loves the series or absolutely hates it. Antonia Peacocke voiced her opinion on the hit series in her article, Family Guy and Freud: Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. At first she was just another addition to the other Family Guy haters, but she eventually came around and saw the humor after the hard to swallow punch lines. “Family Guy does not aim to hurt… creators take certain measures to keep it from hitting too hard.” Peacock says (307). What the creators are reenacting in the shows are not exactly, socially acceptable. However, that’s what draws its viewers, its cutting edge take on society’s problems and differences. The fact is, what is being said in the series is not a lie, maybe more bias due to the point of view, but it’s based off the truth. The reason people find the show so funny is because it may have happened to them or a friend. One may be offend by Family Guys risky takes on sensitive subjects, but it is the truth and the truth hurts sometimes.…
In the article, “Family Guy and Freud: Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious”, Antonia Peacocke discusses the struggles that the television series has dealt with ever since it was first aired in April of 1999. She claims that although the series seems extremely immature and crude, it is actually politically correct. Peacocke describes the types of jokes made in Family Guy and explains that if they were to be looked at more in depth rather than just at their surface value, they really possess a more insightful meaning. Family Guy is a show that does not intentionally intend to poke fun at people to make them feel unintelligent, but to describe and attempt to lighten up the issues that take place in every day society of in the world as a whole.…
Psychoanalysis theory first came to be around the late 1800’s, discovered by the renowned theorist Sigmund Freud, also known as the father of the theory. Freud was born in Moravia in 1856; he studied under Charcot in Paris for a while, eventually starting a private practice in Vienna, being forced to leave by the Nazis, because he was Jewish. His concept developed from people who were considered to be hysteric, being burnt and ridiculed, because they were seen as lazy and deviant. Later on in the 19th century, theorists began to grasp an understanding of the mental illness and termed it as neuropathology, which evolved into Psychoanalysis. This theory sought to treat mental disorders by investigating interactions amongst the conscious and…
This book Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity by David Entwistle (2010), talks about the incorporation of Christianity, and psychology. He stated, “Primarily psychology and Christianity are perceived by many people to be in opposition.” The two of them address general questions relating to human experiences and life from different angles. Enwistle explains that, “Christianity is based on the Word of God. Psychology’s foundation is supported empirically. Because psychology is empirically based, it does not allow any space for faith or recognition of the supernatural.” Christianity is based on faith and believes the Bible is the foundation of all truth. David Entwistle explained that, “Psychology uses empirical methods of study while theology studies human interpretations of God’s Word.” Entwistle provided a very detailed look at how these two different ways of viewing human behavior can be integrated. The purpose of this book is to assist its readers to completely understand the integration of these two disciplines. Although they appear to be seen as opponents, David Entwistle gives a thorough look at each of them and creates an avenue in which to show how they go together. A great amount of this book covers the examination of the different models used to comprehend the various views of integration. These models are looked at in a manner to let the reader personally recognize and examine their individual way of viewing integration. This book began by taking an in depth look at how our worldviews influence the way in which we think about everything. This includes psychology and Christianity. Entwistle uses the idea of "worldview" to give details on how we are able to look through our window to decide how we see our view as it relates to the world. According to Entwistle (2010), everybody has…
S. Freud’s The Future Illusion and P. Tillich’s Religion as a Dimension in Man’s Spiritual Life carry on about an important question of what religion really is, what is its meaning in a cultural, psychological and scientific aspect and how it relates to a society and an individual. In this paper I will try to prove through an analysis and comparison of both texts that although their approach to the subject is different they both regard religion as an important aspect of human life. Freud in Illusion touches on things that to some may be an unquestionable truths; a meaning of life, a reason to be a good citizen - a good human being. Freud strips religion of its “holiness” but not of its power over a culture and a human life. He argues that religion in its essence is nothing more than an illusion - a wishful thinking based on a subconscious hope for a reward (the afterlife). According to Freud, religion is an aspect of culture - civilization, defending us against nature and each other. Civilization is a necessity that was socially constructed in order to explain and control the unknown and scary forces of the world but more importantly to cage our primal desires of: incest, murder, cannibalism which lay deeply in our unconscious. Therefore, to save humanity civilization created laws. At first the forces of nature were given human characteristics to make the assimilation easier and simpler to comprehend. The so called totemism was clear and understandable serving a purpose of control and protection from the environment and ourselves. But who would obey the laws if there was no fear of punishment for doing wrong and a reward for doing good. That is when religion came in handy.…
To Freud, the mind was a mechanistic energy system that derived mental energy from the physical functioning of the body and constantly attempted to moderate this physical effort or tension by restoring it to a quiet steady (quiescent) state. This energy is not evenly distributed to all human purpose or functioning, and if blocked from expression will manifest itself as anxiety, which through cathartic release, prescribes a least resistant path of action. Because anxiety is painful, the mind attempts to cope with this state through a range of defence mechanisms that alter reality and supress feelings that stimulate this state. The mind and its energies (derived from drives or…
The Victorian age was a time period where scientists were exploring different topics. Sexual matters, the unconscious and motivation had all been studied before Freud. Dr. Wilhelm Fleiss created imaginative theories about both genders. Ideas about the unconscious mind and hypnosis started being looked at. Friedrich Nietzche was a philosopher that focused on motivation. He wrote a book in 1883 called Thus Spoke Zarathustral. He discussed the hidden motives that people do not recognize. Freud read Nietzche's book. Sigmund Freud goes to medical school in 1873 and meets Joesph Breuer. He did research on neurological aspects and focused on cocaine. He then opens his own private practice and begins using hypnotherapy. He writes a paper with Breuer…
Intro - Religion plays a big role in altering someone’s personality or changing how people…
Among Freud, Jung, and Adler, Freud is indisputably the most towering monolith. It was Freud's pioneering use of the term "the I" "das Ich" in his native German, which was then translated into the Latin "ego" that brought "ego" into common parlance and popular interest to the process of self-consciousness. Adler's school of psychology, which he called "Individual Psychology," was based on the idea of the indivisibility of the personality. His most significant divergence from Freud's premises was his belief that it was crucial to view the human being as a whole not as a conglomeration of mechanisms, drives or dynamic parts. And in contrast to most psychological thinking of the time, Adler believed that, fundamentally, human beings are self-determined.…
Carl Gustav Jung a Swiss psychiatrist and a contemporary to the most controversial minds: Freud, who of which Jung’s theories to begin with were influenced by, but later grew opposition towards his ideas and started pursuing his own. Simply Viewing religion as a natural process and considered it as something that was ultimately good for our mental well being.…
In a society that offers no hope of happiness or release from struggle and suffering, people quite naturally begin to place their hopes elsewhere. They respond to their condition by hoping for something that lies outside the conditions and constraints they cannot control or influence. Religion becomes some kind of hope for rescue from life. Religion responds by offering either internalization to a spiritual realm or an external hope of a better world and a better life beyond the pale of death.…