Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Freedom of Speech For Teachers

Good Essays
731 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Freedom of Speech For Teachers
Education Week – Published Online: Sept. 5, 2013
Do You Have the Right to be an Advocate?
By: Julie Underwood

Where do teachers freedom of speech rights that are protected under the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution start, and where do they stop? This is what Underwood is trying to tease out in her article by highlighting past precedent and current events that have molded the court’s opinion in matters of a teacher’s right to free speech. She makes the distinction that teachers do indeed have the right to free speech outside of the classroom, and that the school district cannot infringe upon that right unless comments made by teachers in the public square harm the school or the district itself. It is when teachers are inside the classroom that their rights to freedom of speech come under scrutiny and criticism by the school when that speech is deemed inappropriate for the curriculum or a disruption to the school’s ability to operate efficiently or inhibit the teacher’s ability to perform his or her job.

Underwood does advocate that teachers use their freedom of speech rights whenever possible (in public and on their own time), and in fact encourages teachers to do so. She states that teachers are more knowledgeable about issues that pertain to schools and education, they do have the constitutional right to free speech (in the correct setting) and that they are modeling the proper behavior of a citizen voicing his or her right to participate in an active democracy.

Underwood describes the precedent and track record of teachers that has been set for being actively involved in the political process in regards to education. Whether it’s fiscal issues, contract issues, library services, class size or standardized tests, teachers know best and should be relied on to give their opinions to the general public.

She also makes the distinction between public and private schools in regards to public opinion. The constitutional rights of public employers are protected, but those of private employers are not. She makes the point that school teachers who serve on the school board are in a conflict of interest and should have to choose between the two positions.

Ultimately she states that, “The district’s or state’s ability to regulate employee speech while in school or at school sponsored activities can be thought of as part of the district’s ability to control what goes on in the classroom.” The school needs to ensure that teachers are not disrupting the school process nor are then indoctrinating students. The school must protect their own interests in instruction and political neutrality. By all means, teachers should not use school resources or school time to advance political agendas (i.e. printing copies of campaign fliers or campaign speeches during school time). One salient quote in regards to this matter was eloquently stated by NYC School Chancellor Joel Klein when he stated:
“When teachers wear political paraphernalia in schools, they may improperly influence children and impinge on the rights of students to learn in an environment free of partisan political influence… Partisan political activity by staff in the presence of students…sends the message that the view expressed carries the support of the school system”

She concludes by stating, “…Public educators are in the best position to influence public policy about public education. Ignoring this opportunity is a mistake.”

The key word here is public – I feel that a teacher should always exercise their right to free speech and ensure that their voices are heard in regards to important educational matters. I believe that teachers should model proper democratic behavior of an active participant of a democracy. In regards to curriculum and instruction in the classroom, I believe that teachers walk a fine line when discussing topics that are controversial or sensitive in nature. I tend believe that teachers should be able to describe their own views when asked by students, in order for them to understand rationale and logic that came to those views. Teachers should by no means use their position to judge students and affect their grades because of their views. I believe that as humans we seek the truth – and the truth hurts sometimes. I believe that teachers should support students and their efforts to seek that truth while engaging in debate and discussion that understands both sides of the story.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Marvin Pickering was a high school science teacher from Will County, Illinois who was fired by the Board of Education for writing a letter to the editor. The letter was published in a local newspaper and contained many negative and inflammatory statements toward the school board regarding their use of taxpayer’s money. Specifically, Pickering was upset about the use of bond money to athletic programs, instead of fixing facilities and paying teachers. The Board of Education concluded that Pickering’s letter was “detrimental to the efficient operation and administration of the schools of the district” (Essex, 2012). Pickering argued that being fired for writing a letter as a private citizen violated both his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights to Free Speech and Due Process under the U.S. Constitution.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. What rights did the students believe had been violated? What is the relevant wording of the First Amendment?…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Bethel School District v. Fraser a lot happened. In my understanding there was a school event in which students gave speeches. The one student gave a speech with language unaccepted in the school, and got suspended, and was not allowed to be voted in for the election. The Father got angry and believed that his sons amendment rights were being violated. He felt like his sons first amendment right of freedom of speech was being withheld from him, along with his fourteenth amendment right. The case first went to a general court and it could not be agreed upon, so in tern it went to the Supreme Court because it could not be agreed upon in the lower court system and was to controversial. The court case was taken extremely seriously because it could change school rights, as they were known.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parties involved: John F. Tinker and Mary Beth Tinker, minors, by their father and next friend, Leonard Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt, minor, by his father and next friend, William Eckhardt v. The Des Moines Independent Community School District…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Garner Vo-Tech Case Study

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Schools may regulate student speech that results in a material and substantial disruption within the school. Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 509, 513 (1969). Garner Vo-Tech must show either that there was an actual disruption within the school or that officials reasonably anticipated a material and substantial disruption was likely to occur. Alternatively, the Court could expand the exception found in Morse that waives the disruption requirement and include speech that calls for the bullying and harassment of a specific student. Morse v. Fredrick, 551 U.S. 393, 407 (2007).…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Des Moines court case was written by Justice Abe Fortas. Its contents contribute to the ideas of those who believe certain kinds of speech should not be prohibited within an educational setting. In this majority opinion statement, Justice Abe Fortas reveals that there is an “absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate [students’] speech” (Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District by Justice Abe Fortas par. 9). Because of this absence of reason, students should be allowed to express their opinions and views on topics of their choice. Justice Abe Fortas justifies his statement by referencing another court case that says “school officials cannot suppress ‘expressions of feelings with which they do not wish to contend’ Burnside v. Byars, supra, at 749” (par. 9).…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If the speech is a disruption to the education process, then the answer is no. In "Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser" the Supreme Court ruled that a student is not completely protected by The First Amendment; the limits being placed on lewd speech. In the case Fraser gave a lewd speech to an audience of his fellow students. The school argued that his speech disrupted the learning environment and therefore is not protected by freedom of speech. The Supreme Court gives the example of the Nation's legislative halls, noting that while "some of the most vigorous political debates in our society are carried on, there are rules prohibiting the use of expression offensive to other[s]" (585). Surely students can abide by the same rules as the people in charge of our country. Unlike the previous texts, Bethel v. Fraser is a case brief. Its intended audience is college educated individuals very familiar with legal issues. This is evident by the academic tone of the brief. The court case illustrates the necessary limits placed on free speech and why these limits are…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    GOVERNEMNT

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In my opinion, The freedom of speech is protected by the first amendment. I agree with the prosecutioner in the case of Texas v. Johnson by stating that Johnson’s right to freedom of speech in the first amendment was violated. Even though the state law was violated, the law was unconstitutional by violating the first amendment.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment states that only if a person’s speech has substantial interference with school discipline or the rights of others it may be censored. Most people take that how it is supposed to be taken. If you actually read the law, it is easy to see that many things…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    continues to explain that Texas Tech bans students to a freedom of speech zone which is only a gazebo that can hold no more than forty people. If a student would like to engage in any type of freedom of speech activities outside of this zone, then they must have approval six days before the activity (504). The fact that students are not permitted to speak their mind freely outside of the gazebo without permission is saddening. Higher authorities are limiting the thoughts of not only students, but also all people because of the fear that they will insult someone or they will speak out against their rules. Freedom of speech should not be limited to a certain zone with only a certain amount of students to hear it because the founding fathers did not intend for it be like this. They came from a country where they were not permitted to have their own opinion; therefore, they wanted the United States to allow freedom of speech whenever and wherever. Limiting speech is limiting diversity, knowledge, and opinion; moreover, censorship is not allowing the country to grow. Rampell continues to state “Crippling the delivery of unpopular views is a terrible lesson to send to impressionable minds and future leaders at Wesleyan and…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, “First Amendment rights are available to teachers and students, subject to application in light of the special characteristics of the school environment.”…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment: freedom of speech is violated with censorship. In the ALA Library Bill of Rights, parents, and only parents, have the right to prohibit or control what their children read. Freedom of expression and of opinion is for everyone, not just for the people that the majority thinks are right. In 1953, Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas said, “Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could easily defeat us,”(Quotations: First Amendment, Censorship…). This shows that even the government can see the harmful effects of book banning. Furthermore, “the school alone has the final say in what books are appropriate for the children under its care to read,…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An estimated 60 million students will attend school in 2017 according to the Department of Education. While many students will not know their rights while attending elementary or high school, student’s constitutional rights do not disappear when they walk through the doors of any place of education.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The landmark case of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District set the precedent for the free speech rights of both students and teachers. Students at a public school in Des Moines, Iowa were suspended after organizing a silent protest to publicize their objections to the Vietnam War. After suing the school district for violating their children's right to free speech, John and Mary Beth Tinker found themselves before the United States Supreme Court, where it was concluded that students' free rights should be protected. Justice Abe Fortas claimed that the lack of facts to adequately “forecast substantial disruption of, or material interference with, school activities” on school grounds made it unconstitutional to deny the student’s “right of expression of opinion” (Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 1969). It is clear that the civil liberties of students need to be taken seriously while they are in school. This also extends to the right of teachers while on school grounds. Because of Tinker v. Des Moines, both students and teachers are now able to freely express their first amendment rights as long as they do not cause a disturbance to the school. This case brought awareness to school districts limiting students’ rights, and continues to affect decisions…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A federal judge denied an injunction Monday aimed at blocking the implementation of Texas’ campus carry law, which permits people to carry concealed guns in public university buildings.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics