Preview

Freedom of Speech?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1794 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Freedom of Speech?
Randa Nakib
Final Draft
Essay 1

Freedom Of Speech?

Living in America means that we as citizens of the country have many rights according to the laws stated in the United States Constitution, which stands for our principles and make up the rights that American 's deserve. One major freedom we have is stated in The First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." This amendment shows that our government should not be allowed to put limitations on the people 's right to express themselves through free speech and religion. We as citizens have the right to voice our opinions as long as we do not cause harm while doing so. This is a reason why many people from around the world choose to come to America, for their right to freedom. The first amendment should apply to everyone who lives in the United States, but in some cases it does not.
In a recent case, a teenage boy 's right to exercise his freedom of speech was challenged by his high school. He wore an "anti-gay" t-shirt to school on the day of, and also on the day after, the Gay-Straight Alliance group organized a "day of silence". The boy, Tyler Chase Harper, was asked to remove his t-shirt, which he handwrote on the front: "I will not accept what God has condemned," and "homosexuality is a sin", on the back (Soto). Because Harper refused to remove his t-shirt, he was sent to the office by his teacher and had to speak to the principal. He again refused to remove the shirt after meeting with the principal, which resulted in being detained in the front office all day. Also, the year before this, Poway High School had a problem with the "Day of Silence"; this led the students to react by getting into arguments and even some physical confrontations throughout the day.



Cited: California. The Ninth Circuit. United States Court of Appeals. Appeal for the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. 20 Apr. 2006. 15 Feb. 2008 <www.uscourts.gov>. "Constitutional Law-Freedom of Speech--Ninth Circuit Upholds Public School 's Prohibition of Anti-Gay T-Shirt 's." The Harvard Law Review 120 (2007): 1691-1698. 14 Feb. 2008 <http://search.ebscohost.com>. "Harper V. Poway Unified School District." National School Board Association. 15 Feb. 2008 <www.nsba.org>. Soto, Onell R. "Lawsuit Over Anti-Gay Shirt Can Proceed, Judge Decides." The San Diego Union-Tribune 06 Nov. 2004. 17 Feb. 2008 <www.signonsandiego.com>. Taylor, Kelley R. "Another Free-Speech Court Case Off T-Shirts." The Education Digest. Nov. 2006. 17 Feb. 2008 <www.eddigest.com>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bethel V Fraser

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On April 26, 1983, Matthew Fraser gave a speech nominating another student for an elected position. The speech was given to about 600 fourteen year olds that chose to attend this assembly. The speech contained sexual innuendo. Before giving the speech Fraser received advise from several teachers that he should change the speech or not give one at all. But he refused to take their advice (2). The next day, he was called in to an administrative office and was suspended for three days and was told he would not be able to give his speech during graduation even though he was at the time the salutatorian. The family of Fraser filed a grievance with the Pierce County school board, but the officer upheld the suspension. In response, to that decision Matthew’s father filed a case against the school district. The District Court ruled that the student’s First Amendment right was infringed upon. The students was awarded a monetary judgment and allowed to give his graduation speech. Later, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court (4). Later, the US Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals in a 7-2 vote to reinstate the suspension, saying that the school district's policy did not violate the First Amendment (3).…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, after viewing North Fargo High School’s student handbook, Mr. Renville’s senior portrait clearly violated the school guidelines which state: “No student will knowingly possess, handle, carry, or transmit any weapon or dangerous instrument in any school building, on school grounds, in any school vehicle or at any school-sponsored activity.4” .The image Renville provided clearly violates the school guidelines and does not pass the “Tinker Test”, therefore the ruling delivered in Tinker v Des Moines independent Community School District does not apply to the supposed infringement on Renville’s freedom of speech…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority opinion claimed that the principal did the right thing in removing the pages before printing. It argued that it did not violate student’s rights, but on the other hand it protected the parents in the divorce article and the identities in the pregnancy article. By protecting the rights of others, he was also protecting the rights of those individual students mentioned in the articles and the school’s image. The minority opinion claims that the articles removed still represented individual student views. Those who argued the dissenting opinion justified it by expressing concern over what permitting censorship will do in the long run. For instance, if censorship was permitted in this case, it would set a precedent for general student censorship with…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Bethel School District v. Fraser a lot happened. In my understanding there was a school event in which students gave speeches. The one student gave a speech with language unaccepted in the school, and got suspended, and was not allowed to be voted in for the election. The Father got angry and believed that his sons amendment rights were being violated. He felt like his sons first amendment right of freedom of speech was being withheld from him, along with his fourteenth amendment right. The case first went to a general court and it could not be agreed upon, so in tern it went to the Supreme Court because it could not be agreed upon in the lower court system and was to controversial. The court case was taken extremely seriously because it could change school rights, as they were known.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parties involved: John F. Tinker and Mary Beth Tinker, minors, by their father and next friend, Leonard Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt, minor, by his father and next friend, William Eckhardt v. The Des Moines Independent Community School District…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    School Board of Norfolk, 801 F.Supp. 1526 (E.D. Va. 1992). Here, a middle school student, Kimberly Broussard, wore a t-shirt that read “Drugs Suck”. Her parents sued on her behalf claiming that her shirt was a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment of the United States. Here, the courts ruled in favor of the school board, saying that although the shirt displayed an anti-drug message, the word “suck” was considered a vulgar word with a sexual connotation and therefore not allowed in school because it interfered with the classroom learning environment. Id. at…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This Court held that student expression may not be suppressed unless school official reasonably conclude that it will “… materially and substantially interfere with the requirements of appropriate disciple in the operation of the school.” Tinker at 513 (1969). The problem posed by the case at bar relates to the level of disruption caused by the production of the parody profile. If there is any sense of disruption, the school would have to believe that there was “substantial” interference. The profile page was widely viewed by students outside of the school and by students on their personal cellphones while at school. The viewing of the profile outside of school did not cause any disruption to the operation of the school. There is no indication that the viewing of the profile during school disrupted the work of the school or any class. Tinker displayed that the Petitioners went about their day completely normally. The only change was the black band on their sleeves. They neither interrupted school activities nor disrupted in the school’s operation. Tinker concluded that, “In the circumstances, our Constitution does not permit officials…

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Supreme Court struck the delicate balance between maintaining an ordered school environment and inculcating First Amendment values within students in four cases, which together defined the boundaries of student-expression rights. The first of these cases, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District has been called the “magna carta of student’s expression rights.” The events in Tinker occurred in 1965 during the controversy of the Vietnam War. In Des Moines, Iowa, a group of adults and students objected to the Vietnam conflict by wearing black armbands. Principals in the area heard of these intentions and, “[feeling] that ‘the schools [were] no place for demonstrations,’” prohibited students from wearing black armbands to school. John and Mary Beth Tinker wore black armbands to school and were suspended when they refused to remove them. The Court held the prohibition and punishment an unconstitutional deprivation of the student’s expression rights because school officials could not of reasonably forecasted substantial disruption of school…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Des Moines court case was written by Justice Abe Fortas. Its contents contribute to the ideas of those who believe certain kinds of speech should not be prohibited within an educational setting. In this majority opinion statement, Justice Abe Fortas reveals that there is an “absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate [students’] speech” (Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District by Justice Abe Fortas par. 9). Because of this absence of reason, students should be allowed to express their opinions and views on topics of their choice. Justice Abe Fortas justifies his statement by referencing another court case that says “school officials cannot suppress ‘expressions of feelings with which they do not wish to contend’ Burnside v. Byars, supra, at 749” (par. 9).…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morse V. Frederick

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    n/a. (2007, June 25). Aclu slams supreme court decision in student free speech case . Retrieved from http://www.aclu.org/free-speech/aclu-slams-supreme-court-decision-student-free-speech-case…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The student’s first amendment right had been violated. This right gives us the freedom of expression, to sum it all up, as long as others are not in danger. The staff was quick to punish these students, who were only exercising their rights.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hollingsworth V. Perry

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: "The Constitution of the United States of America: Amendments 11-27." Archives.org. N.p., n.d. Web. Garrison, Jessica. "Supreme Court Keeps California in Suspense on Gay Marriage."Latimes.com. Los Angeles Times, 3 Dec. 2012. Web. 4 Dec. 2012. "Lawrence v. Texas." Casebriefs.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 Dec. 2012. "Proposition 8 Decision." Hrc.org. Human Rights Campaign, 26 May 2009. Web. 4 Dec. 2012. "Romer v. Evans." Casebriefs.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 Dec. 2012.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One case is Papish v. Board of Curators of the University of Missouri (1973), 410 U.S. 667. In this case Barbara Papish, a 32-year-old graduate journalism student at the University of Missouri, was expelled for distributing in the heart of a campus newspaper containing assuredly indecent speech. (Senat, 2013) The newspaper cartoon Papish published did not state any violence nor had true threats. University of Missouri did not have the right to expel Papish based on the fact the cartoon had offensive language. The courts filed in the favor of Papish. Papish case used reference from Healy v. James, in which the Court had alleged that even though a state university could enforce reasonable rules governing student conduct, "state colleges and universities are not enclaves immune from the sweep of the First Amendment (Senat, 2013)." Papish cartoon was protected because it did not promote threats nor…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the dispute of flag burning has come before the Supreme Court several times in the past several decades, “on June 11, 1990, the Supreme Court once again ruled that burning the flag was an example of constitutionally protected free speech” as…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The landmark case of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District set the precedent for the free speech rights of both students and teachers. Students at a public school in Des Moines, Iowa were suspended after organizing a silent protest to publicize their objections to the Vietnam War. After suing the school district for violating their children's right to free speech, John and Mary Beth Tinker found themselves before the United States Supreme Court, where it was concluded that students' free rights should be protected. Justice Abe Fortas claimed that the lack of facts to adequately “forecast substantial disruption of, or material interference with, school activities” on school grounds made it unconstitutional to deny the student’s “right of expression of opinion” (Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 1969). It is clear that the civil liberties of students need to be taken seriously while they are in school. This also extends to the right of teachers while on school grounds. Because of Tinker v. Des Moines, both students and teachers are now able to freely express their first amendment rights as long as they do not cause a disturbance to the school. This case brought awareness to school districts limiting students’ rights, and continues to affect decisions…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays