Most people would contend that the answer to this question is overwhelmingly “yes”. The Federal government has been chosen to provide this protection. Dr. Friedman disputes these common notions that consumers need protection from the government or that these actions on behalf of the government actually cause persons to be better off. Again, he argues that consumer’s problems are actually caused by the government’s interference and that the best protection for a consumer is found within a totally free market. This is because of the fact, that when people are offered alternative choices, poor quality goods and services are weeded out, leaving only higher quality ones. The armor this freedom of choice provides is sufficient for consumers and attempts by government to protect consumers actually worsen their
Most people would contend that the answer to this question is overwhelmingly “yes”. The Federal government has been chosen to provide this protection. Dr. Friedman disputes these common notions that consumers need protection from the government or that these actions on behalf of the government actually cause persons to be better off. Again, he argues that consumer’s problems are actually caused by the government’s interference and that the best protection for a consumer is found within a totally free market. This is because of the fact, that when people are offered alternative choices, poor quality goods and services are weeded out, leaving only higher quality ones. The armor this freedom of choice provides is sufficient for consumers and attempts by government to protect consumers actually worsen their