Preview

Framework Paper

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
28198 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Framework Paper
BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN ACCOUNTING
Vol. 23, No. 1
2011
pp. 1–43

American Accounting Association
DOI: 10.2308/bria.2011.23.1.1

A Proposed Framework for Behavioral
Accounting Research
Jacob G. Birnberg
University of Pittsburgh
ABSTRACT: Behavioral accounting research BAR is richer today, in the topics covered, the methods used, and the range of sub-areas of accounting in which it is performed, than ever before. This paper offers a framework within which BAR literature can be viewed as a whole rather than in segments, such as by accounting sub-areas or by research method. The framework classifies BAR by the focus of the research: the individual, group, organization, or the society within which accounting exists. The purpose of the framework is to help researchers in BAR to appreciate the insights to their research questions that can be found in BAR using another research method or studying a similar issue in another sub-area of accounting. Existing research in each of these four areas is discussed to illustrate the usefulness of the framework. In addition, behavioral research in other disciplines that could impact BAR and areas of potential future research are discussed.
Keywords: behavioral accounting research.

INTRODUCTION n the 20 or so years since Birnberg and Shields 1989 reviewed behavioral accounting research BAR , the area of applied behavioral research in general and BAR in particular has burgeoned. The BAR literature has grown in breadth, depth, and complexity. This change reflects an important trend in BAR: the reference disciplines and the object of accounting and nonaccounting behavioral researchers have broadened.
The behavioral decision-making and cognitive psychology literatures that stimulated a significant portion of the emerging BAR research up to the late 1980s continue to have a significant influence on BAR e.g., Camerer 2001 . In addition, the role of behavioral research has grown in other social science disciplines.



References: Ackert, L., B. Church, and R. Deaves. 2003. Emotion and financial markets. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review 88 2 : 1–9. ——–, ——–, and P. Zhang. 2001b. Uncertain litigation cost and seller behavior: Evidence from an audit game Ahrens, T. 1996. Styles of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society 21 2 : 139–173. ——–, and C. Chapman. 2007a. Theorizing practice in management accounting research. In Handbook of Management Accounting Research, Vol Amer, T. S. 2005. Bias due to visual illusion in the graphical presentation of information. Journal of Information Systems 19 1 : 1–18. Anderson, S., J. Hesford, and S. M. Young. 2002. Factors influencing the performance of activity based costing teams: A field study of ABC model development time in the automobile industry ——–, and S. Weidner. 2007. Doing quantitative field research in management accounting. In Handbook of Management Accounting Research, Vol Ansari, S., and K. Euske. 1987. Rational, rationalizing, and reifying uses of accounting data in organizations. Appiah, K. A. 2007. The new philosophy. The New York Times Magazine, Section 6 December 9 : 34, 36. Argyris, C. 1952. The Impact of Budgets on People. New York, NY: The Controllership Foundation. Arnold, V., D. Clark, N. Collier, S. Leech, and S. Sutton. 2006. The differential effect of knowledge-based system explanations in novice and expert judgment decisions Behavioral Research In Accounting Volume 23, Number 1, 2011 Bailey, W., and A. Spicer. 2007. When does national identity matter? Convergence and divergence in international business ethics Banker, R., S. Lee, and G. Potter. 2000a. A field study on the impact of a performance-based incentive plan. ——–, G. Porter, and D. Srinivasan. 2000b. An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes nonfinancial measures Barberis, N., and R. Thaler. 2003. A survey of behavioral finance. In Handbook of Economics of Finance, edited by Constantinides, G., M Baskerville, W. 2003. Hofstede never studied culture. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28 1 : 1–14. Baxter, A., and W. F. Chua. 2003. Alternative management accounting research—Whence and wither. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28 2/3 : 97–126.† Becker, S., and D Beckmann, D., and L. Menkhoff. 2008. Will women be women? Analyzing the gender differences among financial experts Bedard, J. C., and S. Biggs. 1991. Pattern recognition, hypothesis generation, and auditor performance in an analytical task ——–, ——–, and J. Maroney. 1998. Source of process gain and loss from group interactions in performance of analytical procedures Berg, J., J. Dickhaut, and K. McCabe. 1995. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior 10: 122–142. Berry, A., T. Capps, P. Ferguson, T. Hopper, and A. Lowe. 1985. Management accounting in an area of the NCB: Rationales of accounting practices in a public enterprise Birnberg, J. 2004. Expanding our horizon: Management accounting in the next decade. Advances in Management Accounting 13: 1–27. ——–, V. Hoffman, and S. Yuen. 2008. The accountability demand for information in China and the U.S.—A research note ——–, L. Pondy, and C. L. Davis. 1970. An experimental study in decision-making. Management Science 16 6 : B356–B372. ——–, and J. Shields. 1989. Thirty years of behavioral research. Behavioral Research in Accounting 1: 23–74. ——–, and C. Snodgrass. 1988. Culture and control: A field study. Accounting, Organizations and Society 13 5 : 447–464. Bohnet, I., and R. Zeckhauser. 2004. Trust, risk, and betrayal. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 55 4 : 467–484. Boland, R., and L. Pondy. 1983. Accounting in organizations: A union of the rational and natural perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society 8 2/3 : 223–234. Bonner, S., G. Sprinkle, and S. M. Young. 2000. A review of the effects of financial incentives on performance in laboratory tasks: Implications for management accounting. Journal of Management Accounting Research 12: 19–64.† Booker, A., A Booth, P., and A. Schulz. 2004. The impact of an ethical environment on managers’ project evaluation Behavioral Research In Accounting American Accounting Association Volume 23, Number 1, 2011

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful